Gwadien
Uneducated Northern Cretin
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2006
- Messages
- 19,842
In my opinion the jury should find guilt. The punishment is where the flexibility lays.
their finds should be that they are guilty of the theft. The judge can then here extenuating circumstances and choose not to punish them for the act.
the judge is a legal professional imo and the jury are not. So they can find guilt of action and its not connected to the punishment.
The punishment is handed down by a single person; IE a judge.
I find it ironic that you pretty much want a totalitarian version of 'justice' lol.