SPAM This thread is for random spam!!

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,490
@Job in desparately trying to justify not doing anything about the impacts we're having non-shocker.

"We've just destroyed the world" we cry, moments before our death.
"So what? Worlds get destroyed all the time" says @Job.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
No my actual point would be that while we can work to stop throwaway plastics, we are going to carry on killing on a beyond epic scale to feed ourselves.
The numbers are just terrifying tbh, thats just fish ffs.
We kill 50 billion chickens a year.
This is how many animals we eat each year

Obviously these are out of natures life cycle, because we produce them for slaughter...its just that all this talk of crashing ecosystems, we run our own food ecosystem.
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,381
@Job in desparately trying to justify not doing anything about the impacts we're having non-shocker.

"We've just destroyed the world" we cry, moments before our death.
"So what? Worlds get destroyed all the time" says @Job.

Ok Doomer.
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,381
Anyway the plastic issue seems one we could easily deal with. We have a large amount of waste plastic, and ever decreasing amounts of energy thanks to people insist we fill the National Grid full of 17th Century technology. If only there was a way to square that circle.

Home - Plastic Energy

Oh.
 

caLLous

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
18,596
Anyway the plastic issue seems one we could easily deal with. We have a large amount of waste plastic, and ever decreasing amounts of energy thanks to people insist we fill the National Grid full of 17th Century technology. If only there was a way to square that circle.

Home - Plastic Energy

Oh.
Off you pop into the sea then to pick it all up.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,490
Off you pop into the sea then to pick it all up.
Yeah. And all of the worlds plastic, which is spread across the globe - including microplastics in the arctic - and bring it back to those two plants in Spain. The whole world's millions-of-tonnes excess.

Oh, and pull it out of the plankton? Maybe you can get 'em to throw it up into a skip or something...
 

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,635
Off you pop into the sea then to pick it all up.

To be fair, it’s quite interesting technology if you look at it for reducing further plastic contamination, but it doesn’t fix the existing ocean problem (maybe a version of the tech on ships running around the Pacific scooping up plastic?), and it doesn’t address micro plastics at all.

edit - the website really needs to die in a fire; massively annoying
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,381
Off you pop into the sea then to pick it all up.

Yes, because in the year of 2019, if we want to get stuff out the sea we have to do it by hand. Big respect to the fisherman who got me my Haddock the other day. By hand clearly.

Or we could look on it as an interesting technology worthy of further development, turning an excess of something we don't need into something we do. That seems like real innovation, not a slightly bigger wind turbine which will be just as useless on a calm day.
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,381
Yeah. And all of the worlds plastic, which is spread across the globe - including microplastics in the arctic - and bring it back to those two plants in Spain. The whole world's millions-of-tonnes excess.

Oh, and pull it out of the plankton? Maybe you can get 'em to throw it up into a skip or something...

Or we could build more plants, some that aren't even in Spain? Construction isn't just a European idea so could potentially be taken further?
 

Embattle

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
13,764
Though ultimately when you look around it still seems the basic inability of people to use bins is also a problem.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,490
Though ultimately when you look around it still seems the basic inability of people to use bins is also a problem.
When you look around (walk down a high-street, into a supermarket etc) - then the ubiquity of plastic as a substance that we use (especially frivolous use) is a huge issue.

It should be a much more severely controlled substance.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Imagine if the oceans were freshwater and we started throwing salt in them.

Everyone would lose their shit, you're killing the planet!!
 

Embattle

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
13,764
When you look around (walk down a high-street, into a supermarket etc) - then the ubiquity of plastic as a substance that we use (especially frivolous use) is a huge issue.

It should be a much more severely controlled substance.

Well that is because it is a brilliant substance but it has serious issues like many of the vital substances we use when controlled and handled badly, personally I want to see tough limits placed on which plastics can be used and how they are used and then due to limiting the plastics that can be used tough controls bought in for recycling. As an example why are we still allowing black plastic trays to be used when we know a lot of places can't recycle them.
 

Embattle

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
13,764
Imagine if the oceans were freshwater and we started throwing salt in them.

Everyone would lose their shit, you're killing the planet!!

Apart from they aren't freshwater and salt is natural whereas plastic isn't and won't benefit the oceans in any way shape or form if it keeps finding it's way in to it.
 

Yoni

Cockb@dger / Klotehommel www.lhw.photography
Joined
Dec 11, 2003
Messages
5,028
What really goads me are eko products individually wrapped in plastic
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Apart from they aren't freshwater and salt is natural whereas plastic isn't and won't benefit the oceans in any way shape or form if it keeps finding it's way in to it.
Well salt didnt benefit the oceans..it just changed it.
There are plenty of 'plastics' that occur naturally...tree resins etc are forms of what we call plastic.
Im just pointing out that life adapts...it may seem 'wrong', but its actually philisophical...is automating slaughter of billions any less wrong than filling the oceans with plastic dust and making nature evolve to cope.
 

caLLous

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
18,596
Well salt didnt benefit the oceans..it just changed it.
There are plenty of 'plastics' that occur naturally...tree resins etc are forms of what we call plastic.
Im just pointing out that life adapts...it may seem 'wrong', but its actually philisophical...is automating slaughter of billions any less wrong than filling the oceans with plastic dust and making nature evolve to cope.
So some fucker came along and dumped loads of salt in the freshwater oceans and everyone was up in arms about how dangerous it was going to be if they didn't do something about it? I must've missed that lesson at school.

You know that the whole problem with plastics is that they don't dissolve right? And that they just hang around in the ecosystem for decades, clogging shit up and killing wildlife? Do you realise how fucking stupid what you're saying is? You must realise...
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,490
tree resins etc are forms of what we call plastic
No they're fucking not. Not even close. If you ever studied organic chemistry at school you'll know that the hydrocarbons require polymerisation - just like oil does - to become plastic.

But you never did study did you Carl. You just drag your knuckles and talk shit.


Do you realise how fucking stupid what you're saying is? You must realise...
Unconsciously incompetent. Nailed on years ago.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,127
Well salt didnt benefit the oceans..it just changed it.
There are plenty of 'plastics' that occur naturally...tree resins etc are forms of what we call plastic.
Im just pointing out that life adapts...it may seem 'wrong', but its actually philisophical...is automating slaughter of billions any less wrong than filling the oceans with plastic dust and making nature evolve to cope.

Isn't that rubber?
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,490
Isn't that rubber?
No. It's resin. Rubber is rubber.

Neither are plastics because plastics by definition are synthetic or semi-synthetic - they don't naturally occur. They require some form of processing to make them.

(Early "plastics" used common processes but in general we make plastic using industrial polymerisation processes - resins and rubbers are polymers but we make plastic out of petroleum and natural gas, processed hard. Long-chain hydrocarbons y'see. The basis of organic chemistry) :)
 

Lamp

Gold Star Holder!!
Joined
Jan 16, 2005
Messages
23,259
If you squirted half a can of expanding foam in your wife's mouth would her head explode?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom