SPAM This thread is for random spam!!

dysfunction

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,709

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,094
Job trying to find other reasons to hate London.

Apart from that it's multi cultural.

I bet Muslims are the reason why there's so many flights!
 

Ormorof

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,920
I also hate london, its noisy, air is barely breathable, too many people, mostly in a space not designed to handle that many people but hey thats why i dont live there ;)
 

dysfunction

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,709
I didn't say it was a London charge.

There are anti terrorist walls all over central london
Home Office urges architects to design terror-proof buildings


There are an unbelievable amount of low flying aircraft

AirportWatch | New study shows dramatic increase in Heathrow flight numbers (= noise) over parts of SE London



oh and ha

Reasons Why London Is the Worst Place Ever

Yes you did you said there would be 5 London charges one of the the dartford crossing....ffs you don't even remember your own drivel.

Buildings being anti terror doesn't mean having walls up everywhere like you said.

Now we are talking about flights....
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Yes you did you said there would be 5 London charges one of the the dartford crossing....ffs you don't even remember your own drivel.

Buildings being anti terror doesn't mean having walls up everywhere like you said.

Now we are talking about flights....
And no I didnt..read it again.
 

dysfunction

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,709
And no I didnt..read it again.

No I'll quote you instead:

Theres likely to be 5 different charges for motorists in London by 2022.

The dartford crossing thing..whatever it is, makes half of its income from fines and all ready its costs £24 to drive in the congestion/air area if your car isnt the latest spec.

There you go. In the same sentence you mention the congestion charge which is a London charge.

But probably due to your really shit grammar and unable to construct sentences properly those two things may not be connected but then again they could be...
But you probably do this deliberately so you can worm your way out of arguments.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
No I'll quote you instead:



There you go. In the same sentence you mention the congestion charge which is a London charge.

But probably due to your really shit grammar and unable to construct sentences properly those two things may not be connected but then again they could be...
But you probably do this deliberately so you can worm your way out of arguments.
Lol..worm your way out of arguments.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,094
How to worm your way out of arguments; by accusing the other person they're worming their way out of arguments.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Dys just spent 10 posts trying desperately trying to ignore the facts after calling my post complete bullshit.
Now he down to his interpretation of some tiny misunderstanding he had that was completely irrelevent to my point, trying in vain to divert the attention.

But no..its me trying to be evasive.
 

dysfunction

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,709
Dys just spent 10 posts trying desperately trying to ignore the facts after calling my post complete bullshit.
Now he down to his interpretation of some tiny misunderstanding he had that was completely irrelevent to my point, trying in vain to divert the attention.

But no..its me trying to be evasive.

Yes you are being evasive as I have proven that you stated the Dartford charge is a London charge as you included it in with the London congestion charge.
How can you dispute that?

It really is like talking to a 3 year old.

I then went on to say this is how you would get yourself out of that and I'm right about that too.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
I said.
Thete is the possibility of 5 seperate charges in the future.

Then I said the dartford tunnel makes half its money from fines in a seperate paragraph.

You have connected the two in your head in violation of sanity.
 

dysfunction

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,709
I said.
Thete is the possibility of 5 seperate charges in the future.

Then I said the dartford tunnel makes half its money from fines in a seperate paragraph.

You have connected the two in your head in violation of sanity.

Not a separate paragraph:
YOU WROTE THE LONDON CONGESTION CHARGE IN THE SAME BLOODY SENTENCE AS THE DARTFORD CHARGE!
Geez you can't even read your own stuff.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Jesus fickballs
Heres my post.

Theres likely to be 5 different charges for motorists in London by 2022.

The dartford crossing thing..whatever it is, makes half of its income from fines and all ready its costs £24 to drive in the congestion/air area if your car isnt the latest spec.

How can any sane person conclude I was thinking that Dartford was part of the charge...and how in living fuck are those two things in the same sentence.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom