SPAM This thread is for random spam!!

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,135
I support people stealing lead off Church roofs, it's tax in my point of view.

As for the parishes that operate on a tight budget?

LOL, our whole welfare state is broken, everything is massive underfunded, they can get fucked asking for more money when they're balling and not paying tax.

The biggest joke of the Church is schools - they contribute like 5% of a total school's budget and they still get to call it a religious school, fuck off, they're rolling in it.
 

Hawkwind

FH is my second home
Joined
Jul 5, 2004
Messages
7,541
I support people stealing lead off Church roofs, it's tax in my point of view.

As for the parishes that operate on a tight budget?

LOL, our whole welfare state is broken, everything is massive underfunded, they can get fucked asking for more money when they're balling and not paying tax.

The biggest joke of the Church is schools - they contribute like 5% of a total school's budget and they still get to call it a religious school, fuck off, they're rolling in it.
My mother used to be a secretary for a financial manager that looked after the CoE property in London. Back when she worked there they were the shitiest landlords going and in the seediest parts of London. She never trusted them after that experience.
 

BloodOmen

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
18,409
43358296_10216691725743509_1864757263848177664_n.jpg
 

BloodOmen

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
18,409
You truly have to wonder what goes through some people's heads:

869TecF.gifv


There was something like that awhile ago, guy got shot in the head while he was live streaming in his car and showing off his gun, his girlfriend picked up the gun and pointed it at his head and it went off, not sure if he died but there was fucking blood shooting out of his noggin.
 

georgie

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
2,293
There was something like that awhile ago, guy got shot in the head while he was live streaming in his car and showing off his gun, his girlfriend picked up the gun and pointed it at his head and it went off, not sure if he died but there was fucking blood shooting out of his noggin.

If it was the same one I'm thinking of I think she got done for attempted murder and he actually survived.
 

Lamp

Gold Star Holder!!
Joined
Jan 16, 2005
Messages
23,259
GCSE Biology

If
2 packets of Mr Kipling cakes
+ 1 large bag of crisps
+ a large chicken dinner
+ half a large bar of chocolate

= stomach cramps + bloating + trapped wind :cry:

(Assume guilt = 0 and blinking mute stupidity = 1)

Solve for Comfort + Happiness.


Answer: 2 gigantic poos :poop::poop:

:)
 

georgie

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
2,293
If it was the same one I'm thinking of I think she got done for attempted murder and he actually survived.

I was close:

Embedded media from this media site is no longer available
View: https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=CqzGS_1522716819

As of August, the guy is alive and is sitting up and speaking. The woman is being charged with aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury and tampering with evidence.
 

BloodOmen

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
18,409
I was close:

Embedded media from this media site is no longer available
View: https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=CqzGS_1522716819

As of August, the guy is alive and is sitting up and speaking. The woman is being charged with aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury and tampering with evidence.

Ah good that he survived, she deserves everything she got, you dont point a fucking gun at someone.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,522
Back from a weekend away.

Whether it worked or not is immaterial. This:
Not indiscriminate, and not murder. Whether you like it or not, both cities were legitimate targets with factories, docks and troops.
Is wrong.

The factories, docks and troops may have been legitimate targets, but the entire city, the children, families, people who may have profoundly disagreed with the war, or even civilian supporters of it (because they read what the press said) were certainly NOT legitimate targets.

They were murdered, en-masse, by a weapon that is indiscriminate by design.

It was a horrendous and despicable war crime, regardless of what any other outcomes may, or may not, have been. And the whole world is still now living under the dark shadow of nuclear weapons and the threat, however remote or not you may think it is, of annihilation by our own hands.
 

Moriath

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
16,209
Back from a weekend away.

Whether it worked or not is immaterial. This:

Is wrong.

The factories, docks and troops may have been legitimate targets, but the entire city, the children, families, people who may have profoundly disagreed with the war, or even civilian supporters of it (because they read what the press said) were certainly NOT legitimate targets.

They were murdered, en-masse, by a weapon that is indiscriminate by design.

It was a horrendous and despicable war crime, regardless of what any other outcomes may, or may not, have been. And the whole world is still now living under the dark shadow of nuclear weapons and the threat, however remote or not you may think it is, of annihilation by our own hands.
Like the fire bombing of dresden, or the in descriminate bombing of coventry or london or berlin.

It was a different time and should not be judged on todays values but on those of the time.

Countries had been at war for 5 or more years and it was seen as a short cut to peace. And it worked.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,522
Like the fire bombing of dresden, or the in descriminate bombing of coventry or london or berlin.
Again. Disgusting. The fact that it went on like that (more ordinance was dropped on Dresden than on Hiroshima - and it was a city with no military value whatsoever, it was simply the "Florence of the North" and everyone was murdered to make a point.

And this:
It was a different time and should not be judged on todays values but on those of the time.
Bull. Wrong is wrong. We can understand the thought processes but we can absolutely condemn them - because they were horrendous crimes against civilians.

Don't be an apologist for mass murder. You can understand why it happens, but absolutely condemn it as a war crime that must never be repeated.
 

Ormorof

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,927
All the Allies had agreed they wanted unconditional surrender of the Axis as early as January 1943, before the Bomb was even designed and the Manhattan Project was barely four months old. That would be some pretty prescient thinking to predict events two and half years down the line.

NB. Japan never once sent out a peace overture that didn't insist on the preservation of existing Japanese Government and Society (and no occupation). They weren't taken seriously because they weren't serious. Even after Hiroshima, the Army was preparing to stage a coup rather than let the Government surrender.

the soviet invasion of their occupied territories and some of the islands with 1.5 million troops signalling they we no longer interested in acting as negotiators also helped :)
 

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,635
Back from a weekend away.

Whether it worked or not is immaterial. This:

Is wrong.

The factories, docks and troops may have been legitimate targets, but the entire city, the children, families, people who may have profoundly disagreed with the war, or even civilian supporters of it (because they read what the press said) were certainly NOT legitimate targets.

They were murdered, en-masse, by a weapon that is indiscriminate by design.

It was a horrendous and despicable war crime, regardless of what any other outcomes may, or may not, have been. And the whole world is still now living under the dark shadow of nuclear weapons and the threat, however remote or not you may think it is, of annihilation by our own hands.

Is wrong in your opinion. And in this regard your opinion isn't worth shit. Because it wasn't classed as a war crime. Getting squeamish about atom bombs when the Americans had been levelling cities with incendiaries for a year at that point is the epitome of post-facto late-20th century squeamishness. And the bomb hasn't killed us all yet; quite the reverse, all of us are less likely to be killed in a war than at any time in human history. Less likely by a very long way.
 

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,635
Again. Disgusting. The fact that it went on like that (more ordinance was dropped on Dresden than on Hiroshima - and it was a city with no military value whatsoever, it was simply the "Florence of the North" and everyone was murdered to make a point.

And this:

Bull. Wrong is wrong. We can understand the thought processes but we can absolutely condemn them - because they were horrendous crimes against civilians.

Don't be an apologist for mass murder. You can understand why it happens, but absolutely condemn it as a war crime that must never be repeated.

Once again, bollocks. Dresden was a marshalling yard and the Soviets asked for it to be bombed. So it did have military value to someone.

"Wrong is wrong". Don't be a fucking simpleton Scouse.
 

dysfunction

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,709
You could actually argue that the dropping of those two A-Bombs is now a very large deterrent to using them ever again.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
You could actually argue that the dropping of those two A-Bombs is now a very large deterrent to using them ever again.
Nothing will stop anything when the shit hots the fan..our nukes can be turned down to 500 tonnes.
Only one thing can stop ours.
Corbyn!!!!
 

fettoken

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
9,640

I find this interesting.

A quick quote from the article:

"The St. Petersburg-based online magazine Bumaga found and interviewed one of the men appearing in the recording, who said that he was paid for acting as a victim.
So, if the video is fiction, and if In The Now even openly states this – what is then the purpose of promoting the story to international audiences? What is in it for a Russian state media outlet?"

There's many of these kind of articles that puts men against women, either on social media but also in regular newspapers. Some more intricate and well produced than others. Staged or not, people jump on em and choose a side..
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,135
I find this interesting.

A quick quote from the article:

"The St. Petersburg-based online magazine Bumaga found and interviewed one of the men appearing in the recording, who said that he was paid for acting as a victim.

So, if the video is fiction, and if In The Now even openly states this – what is then the purpose of promoting the story to international audiences? What is in it for a Russian state media outlet?"

There's many of these kind of articles that puts men against women, either on social media but also in regular newspapers. Some more intricate and well produced than others.

It's almost like someone is trying to put down the leftie-snowflakes on purpose.

Why does Russia want a powerful Right?
 

fettoken

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
9,640
It's almost like someone is trying to put down the leftie-snowflakes on purpose.

Why does Russia want a powerful Right?

Well. Not so much put down snowflakes as to create a dissonance between the populace *tinfoil-mode on*. I think it's due to our (at least mine) short attention span due to increasing availability of information over the media-spectrum and how it's presented that leads to lessened scrutiny.

I'm trying to cut down my social media time more and more, but am honestly hooked a little bit

edit: To add, i think most media does a great job of turning a plethora of people on a wide spectrum against each other. Not with promoting a healthy discussion, but to create buzz, clicks and strong opinions.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom