SPAM This thread is for random spam!!

[fettoken]

When a newspaper headline reads: "THIS MUCH beer you can drink to become healthier" you know it isn't completely legit source for health advise.

 

[BloodOmen]

 

[sayward]

Still trying to figure out what gets more tedious, the outrage in the Daily Mail or the outrage about it.

I find the easiest way to show my disapproval is to just not buy it.

My first thought was God what awful legs they should be covered up!

 

[Raven]

Haha, cunts

Daily Mail urges 'legs-it' critics to 'get a life' - BBC News

 

[Moriath]

Haha, cunts

Daily Mail urges 'legs-it' critics to 'get a life' - BBC News

For someone so critical of the bbc you qutoe it a lot.

 

[Raven]

For someone so critical of the bbc you qutoe it a lot.

I like reading things with poor spelling.

 

[Moriath]

I like reading things with poor spelling.

Poor typing. My spelling is fine . My typing on my ipad is anything but.

 

[BloodOmen]

 

[Gwadien]

I remember this doing its rounds on Facebook a couple of years ago.

It wasn't funny then.

 

[BloodOmen]

I remember this doing its rounds on Facebook a couple of years ago.

It wasn't funny then.

Pff, bloody young whipper snappers.

 

[Tom]

It's like a sketch from the 1970s.

 

[dysfunction]

Best after you've had 10 pints.

 

[Job]

Reading the Guardian comments on the dailymail story.
Seriously, Liberals acting out the parodies of themselves, 'an assault on women', 'disgustingly sexist'.
It was a pathetic joke based on the word brexit, stop giving it airtime, faux horror is simply crying wolf.

 

[Zarjazz]

... faux horror is simply crying wolf.

Pot, kettle, black ...

 

[BloodOmen]

 

[fettoken]

Good morning bitches.

 

[old.user4556]

I love Battlefield 1, love it. I can't wait to get a good 20 minute game when I get in from work, but the hackers are fucking ruining it. It's utterly blatant as well which usually results in bans (sniper headshots through heavy fog from miles away), but it's the insidious hackers that are the worst.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwGj_3PUt7s

 

[BloodOmen]

 

[Scouse]

the hackers are fucking ruining it.

*cough* EA *cough*

Always been a problem with Battlefield. The just don't give a shit. Hacks on day 1? Sounds like they don't mind - hackers gonna hack, right? So sell 'em some games to hack in...

 

[BloodOmen]

 

[Raven]

It seems the experts have been at it again, the badger culls have been a complete waste of time. A cruel, damaging waste of time at that.

 

[Scouse]

It seems the experts have been at it again, the badger culls have been a complete waste of time. A cruel, damaging waste of time at that.

The scientists, however, are the ones that are kicking up a fuss - saying that the cull isn't supported by science. You wouldn't know about it unless the scientists were kicking up a fuss.

So, it's not really the experts at all. Like lots of things - it's wankers in government, DEFRA, politicians and pressure groups (in this case the NFU) fucking over good science because "MUST DO SOMETHING!!1!"

 

[Raven]

Well...No. It was specially selected scientists that decided that it was the best way forward. Experts in their field (hur hur) Absolute certainty to work, those that called bollocks were clearly mentally handicapped and should probably be on a list.

That's the problem when you only listen to scientists that happen to agree with you.

 

[Raven]

View: https://www.facebook.com/boxingbibleuk/videos/1531932943508322/

 

[Moriath]

The scientists, however, are the ones that are kicking up a fuss - saying that the cull isn't supported by science. You wouldn't know about it unless the scientists were kicking up a fuss.

So, it's not really the experts at all. Like lots of things - it's wankers in government, DEFRA, politicians and pressure groups (in this case the NFU) fucking over good science because "MUST DO SOMETHING!!1!"

The wankers in government didnt take advice from any scientists then ? When they made their choice.

There isnt two sides of scientists?

 

[Scouse]

The wankers in government didnt take advice from any scientists then ?

The scientists gave a very specific set of instructions if it was to have any hope of working. They're not being followed.

The scientists who advised the government have come out and said that their advice is being ignored and that they can't even measure if the cull will work, which is now unlikely.

 

[Moriath]

The scientists gave a very specific set of instructions if it was to have any hope of working. They're not being followed.

The scientists who advised the government have come out and said that their advice is being ignored and that they can't even measure if the cull will work, which is now unlikely.

So there is only one set of scientists with one view.

Your talking shit.

 

[Scouse]

So there is only one set of scientists with one view.

Your talking shit.

You're a fucking idiot who thinks everything has some magical "balance".

Newsflash - badgers aren't seen as important as global warming. There aren't teams of badger scientists with differing opinions on how best to achieve reduction of bovine TB through badger culling. There's no "controversy" over sharply rising badger population hockey graphs.

There's a small set of experts which have given scientific advice which is being disregarded by non-scientific bodies. If you care to read...

 

[Moriath]

But everytime you say something you say scientists say. As if its some great united wall that agrees with you or you agree with it.

Everything from badgers to global warming to gm foods.

Scientists say. But what you dont say is some scientists. Or the majority of scientists.

Just that there is this mythical entity called scientists who always happen to agree with your argument.

Im sure you would have been on the side of scientists when they thought radium was harmless if you were born in a different time.

You never seem to give credence or even suggest there is an opposing view.

You are a person who goes with the masses and will follow the sheep of the cliff if the scientists said t was the thing to do.

Just because at the moment peer reviewed articles say one thing doesnt mean that in the future they may change their mind.

I mean everyone used to think the body was made of four humours and bleeding was a good medicine.

Call yourself a follower of the main stream view. But that everything you say is the truth. Maybe in this time but maybe not next year or five years time.

 

[Scouse]

Jeesus. You can't even read, never mind comprehend the points I made.

There is no opposing scientific view in this case. Kapiche?

Just opposing non-scientific views.

Read the fucking article ffs.