- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 36,689
This. Because whatever Raven thinks about how.unfairly UKIP gets treated it IS a party of and for racists and homophobes.It would be funny for all of a week at most.
This. Because whatever Raven thinks about how.unfairly UKIP gets treated it IS a party of and for racists and homophobes.It would be funny for all of a week at most.
You don't put racist policies in a manifesto, but yep. I think strictly it is.Nope, because it isn't strictly true, is it?
UKIP Manifesto said:Prioritise social housing for people whose parents and grandparents were born locally
It doesn't have to mention skin colour to be clearly racist. If they did then they would be locked up for it - remember, we don't have freedom of speech in this country.And in response to your edit. Yeah a pretty badly worded item but I don't think even that is racist, not really.
isn't true.My point is that a lot of people will be voting UKIP, and for good reason.
I am not going to be voting UKIP...
My point is that a lot of people will be voting UKIP, and for good reason. The people have clearly shown that a vote on Europe is what they want as representatives of the people all parties should be offering the choice and thus creating the debate.
Burying our collective heads in the sand isn't going to force Europe to change, maybe the threat of it burning to the ground will. The UK isn't the only country utterly fed up with the bloated, unfair, pile of shit that Europe currently is.
I think people are just fed up of being told that "we know best" from the establishment.
I don't think any of them really give a toss what you think. They're just saying and doing stuff to get / keep themselves in power.As Raven said, I don't think the Labour party give a toss what you think
It's really easy to verify the veracity of what I said there m8.I don't know where you get it all from Scouse.
Serious question...
If "Enough" people actually spoilt there ballot paper in protest... What would happen?
Also... What would be "enough"
Facts please, not conjecture. (If it isn't something that is actually defined... clear then fair enough)
It's never happened - so giving anything other than conjecture is difficultFacts please, not conjecture.
It's never happened - so giving anything other than conjecture is difficult
A large spoiled ballot would, however, demonstrate a clear dissatisfaction with all politicians. It gets recorded and reported. I suspect in practice a significant spoiled ballot vote would enable comentators to press leaders very strongly on the legitimacy of their mandate.
It can.Not voting demonstrates apathy
It can.
However, it's also the *only* way to register your disafection with the system itself. A spoiled ballot shows your problem with the parties, not the system.
Non-participation in a system you abhor is a perfectly valid choice.
I don't know why you think I'm being obtuse - I'm just talking to you. in fact I agree with yours and ravens point about the effects of spoiled ballots.And not participating in the system just makes them think you don't care. If you weren't being so obtuse you would see that.