Calaen
I am a massive cock who isn't firing atm!
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 9,538
Do eating habits mean that much?
It's no different to UKIP being in charge of immigration
Do eating habits mean that much?
He refused to sing the national anthem at the Battle of Britain show, who the fuck does he think he is, this ideological wankoff is so far out of touch with the public, who the hell does he think votes for Labour, an army of Trotskies?
He won't last a month the way he is going, he is being exposed as a Liberal intellectual who's obsession with the facts completely removes him from knowing anything about the reality.
Who? Skinner or Corbyn?
They're both Republicans.
I'd say the country is split 25/25/50 in the case of the monarchy 'do you like them?' 25 saying yes 25 saying no and 50 not giving much of a fuck.
Just because it doesn't sit with your inward looking 19th century nationalistic views
The National Anthem is a song which glorifies the monarchy, if you sang Rule, Britannia on the other hand...
Not actually the point. I'm a republican too, but if I'm representing my Party at an official event where the national anthem is sung, I'm singing the national anthem. My personal views on the content of said national anthem are irrelevant (I also think its an objectively terrible tune and song, and that too is besides the point), you sing it because it represents the country, the one that you'd like to run one day.
Depends on your principles.
Jeremy Corbyn stuck to his guns, and not bending to party rules in order to not upset people.
We live in a time where we're fully aware politicians lie through their teeth to achieve what they want to achieve, and we all agree that this is a bad thing.
Then we get upset when they stick to their principles?
His principles in this case are irrelevant. He's not there as Jeremy Corbyn MP, he's there as Jeremy Corbyn, Leader of The Opposition. Rules of expectation are different.
Maybe, but he's not playing to his Socialist Worker mates any more, he has an electorate to convince.
How about we go back to the good old days where political parties actually had an agenda to pursue.
Rather than getting as close to the middle ground without actually getting your phallus stuck up the other parties rectum to win voters?
I appreciate a change in politics, but this prick is acting like a spoilt kid at the college union disco, you play the game and then convince people of your arguments.
You don't knock on someone's door. tell him is wife is ugly , then ask him if he want's to buy a hoover.
As I have said, I remember the militant Labour and I Also remember what a gang of shitehouses they were when the shit hit the fan.
The councillers who were personally fined for Liverpool council going broke, one was in our work, we had a whip around to the tune of 30 grand to pay off his debt, I gave 100 quid myself, the fucker never even said thanks, he really didn't, then 3 weeks later the hard faced twat turned up in a brand new car to work.
When I said I gave 100 quid, basically the hard bastards went around practically demanding it, they employed rent a gangster to visit every exchange and pointing out who didn't pay.
They are a bunch of anti wealth fucknuts , because they haven't got it.
Dunno, atleast he's picking real issues.
As opposed to picking on a minority and blaming them for everything.
You wouldn't catch me singing god save the queen either.He refused to sing the national anthem
Ithink the tories took stock of what they had and have done a fine job. MostlyNo. I expect him to understand the realities of the situation.
It was clearly horrible on *both* sides of the equation...
Actually - I think he understands that perfectly but doesn't give a fuck because to give a fuck means he'd have to change his politics and ideologies...
Diane always has been. Very much woe the poor black person.Abbot.
"White people divide and conquer"
Like the over ten years of labour. And brown wasnt complacent? its the same again. And corbyn is a nice change to shake up the regulars.It's a disaster, we might end up with 10 years of Tory rule, which even I think can only lead to John Major-style complacency and nepotism. On the plus side, I'm sure UKIP will get some votes from that lefty retard Corbyn.
Like a monarchy yes or no is a real issue that he seems to have sparkedDunno, atleast he's picking real issues.
As opposed to picking on a minority and blaming them for everything.
I wouldnt sing it but im not a representative of her maj government.You wouldn't catch me singing god save the queen either.
Sky Fairy save the Privileged by Birth?
Being a member of a democratic government in no way obligates you to support the status quo.I wouldnt sing it but im not a representative of her maj government.
Being a member of a democratic government in no way obligates you to support the status quo.
It would be hypocritical of a republican to sing god save the queen. He stood there in respectful silence - as opposed to loudly booing - which would have represented his perfectly legitimately held opinion more clearly.
Those who are complaining about his non-action are supporters of the monarchy and are being intellectually dishonest in their attempts to link the democratic freedom to hold a different opinion on the makeup of our country to a hatred of the UK.
And if nothing else the sloppy cunt could have buttoned his shirt and tie up properly.
For the most part I agree with you there @DaGaffer - but I think Corbyn has more to lose than to gain by singing it.
Edit: The fact that they were written in the 18th century is more reason to change it tbh. Progressive, anyone?