Irritating because they are a club with a bit of history upsetting the money boys who would have been championship at best without a billionaire owner?
Ah, facepalm! Soild argument; I conceed to your superiority!!!
He has managed to adapt but what will happen next year, who have you got who can replace him?
Die!concede*
![]()
Same again thanks Stevie. He's still got plenty of legs for a few years in that position.
BTW - @gohan's right - nothing's changed. We still need to Win 3, Draw 1 to guarantee it.
Shitty have a better goal difference and a game in hand. If we lose to Chelski it means we'll have to absolutely batter the other teams to beat City - and City are more than capable of doing that if they get a whiff of the title again.
So yep. No change. Need to not lose any of the games and win at least 3 of them.
Yet no one has used that word. At all. Ever. In the history of mankind. infact I'm fairly sure you've just made this word up.If you were just playing the domestic competitions then yes but with the European ones as well?
My issue isn't about what Liverpool need to win and I'm perfectly willing to accept Chelsea have chance to beat Liverpool and that if we do it helps Man City but the idea Liverpool are some how the underdogs in our encounter is utterly preposterous.
If you were just playing the domestic competitions then yes but with the European ones as well?
...the idea Liverpool are some how the underdogs...
I don't give a monkeys about the European competitions - Liverpool aren't in them. I'm talking about the Premier League - and Gohan's analysis was correct - we need to Win 3 Draw 1 to guarantee a win - so Chelski's loss today hasn't changed that one bit.
Think you've got the wrong end of my question, my comment was about SGs ability to play in all competitions next year including European ones and utterly nothing to do with this years remaining games.
Outside of the PL Suarez will cost less after his contract extension. Before the wording on his release clause meant they could reject it as they did with us. Now it is iron clad at £60?m if Real or PSG ect want him. I love the way they are playing but Liverpool will be as bad as Arsenal as they have less money. If the big boys want the players they will go. The owner is there to make money....and struggle to keep hold of who exactly? Sturridge will stay without a doubt, Sterling will stay without a doubt and to get Suarez away after his recent contract extention will probably cost 100mil. That's 100mil to buy a replacement plus shore up the defence, which is Liverpools only real weakness, and not that much of a weakness to be honest.
We've not got the squads of Chelski or City so yep, we lack strength in depth and will need to buy to rotate.
However, Chelsea don't look the same without Hazard, City without Yaya, Aguero and Silva (but they've got an even bigger embarrasment of riches than Abramovich's boys).
As long as LFC focus on the League then anything else is a bonus for now tbh. We were nearly out of business 3 years ago and are still recovering from that remember...
I still maintain that competition killed Spuds again this year. So I agree if you miss the Champions League you are better off avoiding Europe.Ironic that doing so badly one year and thus avoiding the UEFA cup competition has probably helped you this year, makes me wonder if other teams will try and avoid it which could get interesting![]()
If you were just playing the domestic competitions then yes but with the European ones as well?
My issue isn't about what Liverpool need to win and I'm perfectly willing to accept Chelsea have chance to beat Liverpool and that if we do it helps Man City but the idea Liverpool are some how the underdogs in our encounter is utterly preposterous.
I also feel we are in for a rough end of season, besides Liverpool and our European games we play two teams fighting for there PL survival and I can feel something similar to today happening again.
There defence is worse, our midfields are about same but there attack is a lot better.
Willian is actually a very promising player, to me he is probably only behind Hazard in our midfield.
Regarding FFP - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...er-City-and-Premier-League-clubs-compare.html
Mike Dean? I don't know if he's actually not allowed to ref a Liverpool game but:is it true mike riley cant ref liverpool gamea vecause hes a scouser?
Dean was originally appointed to referee the 2006 FA Cup final at the Millennium Stadium on 13 May 2006 but the Football Association later replaced him with Alan Wiley after concerns were raised about Dean's ability to be impartial towards Liverpool, who are based near his hometown in Wirral.
I can't either to be fair. I mean Sunderland have beaten Chelsea and drawn with City in the space of a week, those are two teams that should not be dropping points to a 20th placed team. I think 'pool will beat Chelsea but they may slip up against one of the others but only to the point of a draw, not a loss.
We beat Sunderland 5-1, in case you forgot. Just sayin'.![]()
They said yesterday that he got to ref his first Merseyside derby after recently moving to Wales. He was never a Scouse fan just lived within the set distance which means no reffing local teams.Mike Dean? I don't know if he's actually not allowed to ref a Liverpool game but: