DaGaffer
Down With That Sorta Thing
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 18,707
I'm not saying that the way teams finish in the league isn't dreadfully predictable right now because it's clearly a factual fallacy to suggest as much, however saying those leagues have 'a couple of decent clubs and the rest are rubbish' is absolutely fucking moronic. Yes, Bayern and to an extent Dortmund are miles ahead of some teams in the Bundesliga just as it is with Madrid and Barcelona, but those teams being so good is not an indicator that the rest of the teams are bad.
Since the inception of the Premier League, five different clubs have won the title. In that time, five different clubs (Barca, RM, Derportivo, Athletico, Valencia) have won La Liga and six different clubs have won the Bundesliga (Bayern, Dortmund, Wolfsburg, Werder Bremen, Stuttgart, Kaiserslautern). So if you want to say those leagues are 'broken' based on the tables, then so is the Premier League.
This debate has been had on here before. Choosing the start of the Prem is misleading because the Ferguson years are a statistical anomaly. There' a broader variety of league winners, CL (and European Cup) entrants from England than any other country. 65% of all La Ligas ever have been won by two clubs, 60% of Serie A by three clubs (in England its 60% across seven clubs) and Bayern have won more Bundesligas than any single English club has won the league (23). None of which is conclusive, but it does seem to me there's generally more of a performance drop-off in Spain and Italy than elsewhere.
However, probably the most effective measure of quality is the number of teams from each country that have gone out in the CL group stage; Spain 12, England 13, Italy 16, Germany 20...
