Everz
FH is my second home
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2004
- Messages
- 13,685
If he said that he is mental the only outfield player that started and gave 100% was Wilshere. There is a reason it took us 70 minutes to get a shot on target and that was a lack of fucking effort.
If that was everything then oh dear.Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger: "We started on the front foot, made a good start. They defended well and we all know what happened on the penalties. We had many, many chances and their keeper had a good game."
"Whenever you go out it's not a good result for Arsenal. We lost on penalties to a team who played very well. I cannot fault the effort of my team - we gave everything for the 120 minutes and you have to give credit to Bradford. It's not a lack of quality - we couldn't convert our chances for different reasons. This was a real cup game. We'll get over this, it's part of our job. We'll focus on the next game."
Senile
He did, was just on TalkSport.
Brilliant.
If the money was being taken out of the club and given to the owners I would agree with you. But they money is still there year after year so i do not. If Wenger did not have the unlimited money the board says he has he would admit it. So I believe he has the funds but he decides not to use it. Over the last few years a fuck load has gone off our debts never into people pockets and the club has said the money is there and the figures back it up. We are not in the same position as you yet fortunately.Arsenal are in it for the cash at the moment. And their fans are mugs for putting up with it.
We are not in the same position as you yet fortunately.
Scouse said:Why sell the best players? And to your biggest rivals too! It negates your chances of winning...
That's true tho.
soze said:RVP is simple business if we kept him he leaves for nothing in a year and its not like he would of won it for us. We can't or won't compete with City United or the Chavs on wages so players will always leave. Especially ones with no loyalty to the club. RVP and Theo are good examples they play for us for money not love so if there is more elsewhere then off the go.
If the money was being taken out of the club and given to the owners I would agree with you. But they money is still there year after year so i do not. If Wenger did not have the unlimited money the board says he has he would admit it. So I believe he has the funds but he decides not to use it. Over the last few years a fuck load has gone off our debts never into people pockets and the club has said the money is there and the figures back it up. We are not in the same position as you yet fortunately.
RVP is simple business if we kept him he leaves for nothing in a year and its not like he would of won it for us. We can't or won't compete with City United or the Chavs on wages so players will always leave. Especially ones with no loyalty to the club. RVP and Theo are good examples they play for us for money not love so if there is more elsewhere then off the go.
You credit him too much. RVP was very happy to sign for Arsenal until one thing happened and that is a £250k a week offer which is £100k a week bump on what we were offering. As soon as that offer came in he released a statement making it impossible for him to stay at Arsenal.I got the impression RVP would have stayed for "love" if he thought Arsenal had a prayer of winning any trophies. No top class player wants to settle for fourth every year, which is the big failure in the Arsenal "business model". Let's be honest, your average French or African blow-in really doesn't want to live in rainy Manchester, they'd be much happier in London, but Manchester offers one thing sorely lacking in N5, ambition.
The Problem with Arsenal seems to be youths. You bring a kid in from another club and they are instantly wanting £10k - £15k a week. Then they get a pay rise when they break into the first team so £25 - £30k. They they have a good season ad rather than losing them we offer them a long term contract 5 or 6 years. Then they start playing like gash Then they go on loan to to a club in Brazil where we still pay them £20k+ a week to play for someone else. All this with 2 years still on the contract and no chance of selling them because no one is willing to meet the wages they want.TOP PREMIER LEAGUE WAGE BILLS 2010-11
Chelsea - £191m (up from £174m in 2009-10)
Manchester City - £174m (£133m)
Manchester United - £153m (£132m)
Liverpool - £135m (£121m)
Arsenal - £124m (£111m)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18248540
Hmmm.
It is not that simple. We are self sustaining. So we buy £50m of players like you say easy we have that cash ready to spend. But then comes the £250k a week we need to pay the superstar or the 3 good players. Over 5 years that is another £15m. The way Arsenal run is to currently make £20m profit a season so if we lose the CL money we survive. As we are not making £30m a year profit without players sales we can not afford that. And had we spent it 3 years ago and still been outspent by the big three we would face not making the CL this year and then starting to lose £5m - £10m a season and as we are self sustaining we can't do that.The thing is, 2-3 years ago you would have only needed to spend around 50 million or so to have probably won some trophies, in doing so you would have kept some of the talent that was around at the time and the success and earnings would have continued. All Arsenal seem to do now is buy quality youngsters, train them up and sell them on, they don't seem particularly interested in winning anything. That isn't just Wenger's fault, it is a problem with the club as a whole.
Arsenal just lost to Bradford
HOW ABOUT THAT FACT
You credit him too much. RVP was very happy to sign for Arsenal until one thing happened and that is a £250k a week offer which is £100k a week bump on what we were offering. As soon as that offer came in he released a statement making it impossible for him to stay at Arsenal.
I also don't get this whole Arsenal lack ambition. We are a self sustaining football club. There is 1 league title to win and 3 clubs with a much bigger War Chest giving them more ability to go after it. So you see ambition as arsenal borrowing £200m to buy in 4 players and pay them for four years? I see that as irresponsible.
You can equally argue that the bet Arsenal make every year of coming in 3rd or 4th to get CL football to maintain the "self sustaining" balance sheet, is also irresponsible, because its a giant bet against a single outcome. Arsenal are actually flirting with financial disaster every year, and it only takes one bad year and then oh look, you're Liverpool. Its all very well having principles, but the EPL isn't the Bundesliga, its far more Darwinian, and Arsenal are in danger of becoming the league's giant Panda, only capable of thriving in one place. So personally I'd say yes, Arsenal need to set their sights higher (and lets not forget that the investment risk to Arsenal, with their 60K stadium, is actually rather less than a lot of other clubs).
No our business model aims to make a £20m profit which is the CL money. IE if we don't get CL we break even. So we are planning around running without it.
I know money is not the only thing. But we are hardly attracting the cream of the crop right now and we have been in the CL every year for over a decade so I dont see it really affecting the players we go after. Maybe Cazorla and Podolski both say no if we are not in the CL but other than that I think we still get everyone else over the last 5 years.
Everz said:I'd say that is more down to their not being many suitors to your existing players. Especially towards matching their wage demands.