Cerb
I am a FH squatter
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2005
- Messages
- 5,033
Gohan your argument is completely based on the speculation that Paisley would have continued that form over the course of his career. I think the reason many consider Fergie the best is that they realize that keeping success going over a sustained period is more difficult.they are flawed because... get this right... see if you can follow....
the ranking is purely on overall points......
if paisley had done lets say 36 years for ease compared to fergies 38 then he would have 6660 points compared to fergies 2780, that's over double and in 2 years less.........
your argument is like saying Heskey (151 goals in 17 years) is a better player than Cantona (73 goals in 5 years in prem) over 3 times the time palying in prem for only double the goals........ but time doesn't matter right? its results that count? so Heskey > Cantona yea?