Awarkle
Fledgling Freddie
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2004
- Messages
- 1,131
I dont understand why GoA has to provide evidence to cheating all that it would do is give the cheaters a means to get around it. Why cant you just accept that the GM's Caught this person cheating in what ever way and they chose to ban. It could be somthing like window dragging to escape an enemy they could have been hidden in a chat group listening to one of them advocate using this cheat and hint guide.
just by saying "o btw go to xxx website and download this cheat book i found" that could have been grounds for the cheating.
peeps seem to be under the asumption just because they do a /who 100 and it shows no GM's online that they arnt watching. A gm can appear in game in any form without broadcasting.
the point being in all these cheat exploit posts/flame wars has goa ever been the first to make the post, no its always the cheaters who make the post tbh if goa caught you cheating then good riddens we dont want cheaters in the game. And anyone defending them cheating should be watched very carefully
just by saying "o btw go to xxx website and download this cheat book i found" that could have been grounds for the cheating.
peeps seem to be under the asumption just because they do a /who 100 and it shows no GM's online that they arnt watching. A gm can appear in game in any form without broadcasting.
the point being in all these cheat exploit posts/flame wars has goa ever been the first to make the post, no its always the cheaters who make the post tbh if goa caught you cheating then good riddens we dont want cheaters in the game. And anyone defending them cheating should be watched very carefully