Kahland
One of Freddy's beloved
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2003
- Messages
- 882
In the 1700s an arm was any weapon, you could own a knife, rifle or a cannon if you wanted. The cannon was the most powerful weapon during that time so why is the government infringing on our right to own certain weapons? Such as firearms. Kitchen knives are allowed, why should firearms not be?
If you can afford the weapon you should be able to own it. If you can afford a tank or drone you should be able to buy one if you want.
Owning powerful weapons will make people safer. Banning guns / limited guns keeps innocent people from being able to protect themselves from criminals who will use any weapon they want.
In these times of riots and civil uprising all around the world, should we not be able to protect ourselves accordingly to these threats?
If you can afford the weapon you should be able to own it. If you can afford a tank or drone you should be able to buy one if you want.
Owning powerful weapons will make people safer. Banning guns / limited guns keeps innocent people from being able to protect themselves from criminals who will use any weapon they want.
In these times of riots and civil uprising all around the world, should we not be able to protect ourselves accordingly to these threats?