Anything that says "we only use 10% of our brains" is a fucking awful and utterly retarded idea from the get-go and any writer who uses it should be barred from using up the earth's vital oxygen supplies.
I did have a cat called LeeLoo and even tho she had shit back legs and pissed everywhere I still loved her.
Very true, Leon alone is worth a few passes. Top film.
Yes..the good news is your son only lost 10% of his brain function in the accident..unfortunately is was the 10% he was using so now he's a plant pot.
Not at all. I never get anyone turn around and say to me "people who can shoot ice from their hands like the silver surfer exist" - they say stuff like "I wish the zombie apocalypse was real because I reckon I'd kick ass". This is people enjoying fictional entertainment in full knowledge of the fact that it's made-up.
The 10% of your brains thing, on the other hand, seems to have gained traction as an idea amongst the general population. It's been used a lot and it is presented as a fact at the beginning of movies that the rest of the movie pivots on. That seems to create in a lot of human minds the impression that it's a real thing (even if they don't beleive the rest of the movie).
I hear "well we only use 10% of our brains" from a lot of otherwise intelligent people. Admittedly - generally those who've no decent level of science-based education but I've heard it discussed between top-level lawyers - partners in huge law firms, people who run businesses and the likes - as well as the droves of knuckle-draggers who make up the bulk of the population.
As an idea it's been done to death. It's unoriginal, tedious drab bullshit indicating a lack of effort and imagination on the part of a writer who's either rubbish (not luc besson) or phoning it in because he doesn't need to try that hard any more (maybe luc besson).
So nyah
Anyway. Teleportation is real and the definition of an android is "a machine that is controlled by a computer that looks like a human" - so is well within the realms of actual possibility.
Time travel is also possible in that it's possible to leave a place and return a few years later with more time having passed at your destination than has passed for you.
Only that definition isn't accurately covering time travel. More like crafty use of quantum physics.
From a pro nit-picker to another
If we're nit-picking it's a crafty use of relativity, not quantum physics
