Really awesome pictures thread
- Thread starter Job
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 36,725
Why?
Job
The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 21,652
- Thread starter
- #366
Noise?
Its a 1000x700 50kb jpg.
Processing is all bit whatever.
90% of cameras highly process the image, RAW is even processed to an extent.
Practically zero published images are straight out of the imaging chip and it was done with film as well.
HDR infests commercial and artistic imagery.
Its a 1000x700 50kb jpg.
Processing is all bit whatever.
90% of cameras highly process the image, RAW is even processed to an extent.
Practically zero published images are straight out of the imaging chip and it was done with film as well.
HDR infests commercial and artistic imagery.
dysfunction
FH is my second home
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 9,709
Yes it does look very grainy and I'm not talking about the water droplets
Wij
I am a FH squatter
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2003
- Messages
- 18,404
dysfunction
FH is my second home
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 9,709
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 36,725
It's called the really awesome pictures thread.
It could be a stick painting by a child tbh. Whilst I absolutely agree with you that I'd rather have photos that were taken and not processed it doesn't really discount them. Job likes it, I don't particularly (would like to see what it looked like without processing though - because the actual subject matter is cool). But it doesn't need a thread rename because of "waaaaah! I hate Job".
I mean, it's his thread after all...
Yoni
Cockb@dger / Klotehommel www.lhw.photography
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2003
- Messages
- 5,025
Of course most pictures are processed to a point - they were when you developed photos also - However there is a tweak and there is over processed- most of these are over processed and some of them very noisy and not that great.
what makes an awesome picture is minimal processing maximum impact - When I look at some of the pictures in this thread I just do not see awesome I see technology making up for lack of talent...
Starting a thread does not dictate ownership either
what makes an awesome picture is minimal processing maximum impact - When I look at some of the pictures in this thread I just do not see awesome I see technology making up for lack of talent...
Starting a thread does not dictate ownership either
dysfunction
FH is my second home
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 9,709
wow what an idiotic place to build houses. right in the river floodplain
~Yuckfou~
Lovely person
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 2,594
- Joined
- Dec 11, 1997
- Messages
- 9,076,994
What is weird is this. My house was built in the 60's.Can't imagine any other country doing that, oh wait..
Two years ago I received a letter from the local authority stating I was now living in a floodplain.
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 36,725
Could be that flood defence work elsewhere has changed the risk level to your home maybe?
You'll be alright, if you tilt your head back you have a built-in snorkel.
- Joined
- Dec 11, 1997
- Messages
- 9,076,994
There are no flood defences where I live. Never has been.
The point is nothing has changed around here. The canal is still here, the Blackwater River is still here (and never flooded to my knowledge and certainly not since I have lived here).
Ormorof
FH is my second home
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 9,887
Might be upstream theyve built something that screws you, happened where i lived in UK, they made decision to delay flooding of bigger town upstream by flooding those of us downstream, never was i so happy i lived on top of the hill as i was that day
every house on street was flooded except us right at the top