Brommix said:maybe true, still doesnt change the fact you should all grow some balls instead of rolling over and play dead.
Brommix said:maybe true, still doesnt change the fact you should all grow some balls instead of rolling over and play dead.
Filip said:but all those albs in OF who never had the chance to run in an Opted group and got killed over and over again didnt leave the game ?
if you fail to see that point then you are to colored by the realm you play in..
Filip said:but all those albs in OF who never had the chance to run in an Opted group and got killed over and over again didnt leave the game ?
if you fail to see that point then you are to colored by the realm you play in..
Solarius said:And any Alb who continues to claim that, post ToA and especially post NF, Albion cannot make decent groups, is exactly the same.
Albion now has all the advantages, yet I still see the old "albs can't make a decent group" crap....
Bracken said:Mid fg is still top of the food chain for fg fights, alb and hibs are equal now, though albs do better against hib groups because hibs haven't adjusted their fg set up to take into account the loss of gp (most still only run with 1 demezzer). Alb fgs have improved with some of the changes (sorc RA for example) but have lost out with the bof and sos nerfs. So over all we're about par with what we were before - not "crap" but still below mids in fg terms. Ofc this is off set by the fact we currently have the relics, which evens it up. Which makes it even more pitiful that many mids are currently hiding away from the world sucking their thumbs
kirennia said:What you doin posting so early
Bracken said:Mid fg is still top of the food chain for fg fights, alb and hibs are equal now, though albs do better against hib groups because hibs haven't adjusted their fg set up to take into account the loss of gp (most still only run with 1 demezzer). Alb fgs have improved with some of the changes (sorc RA for example) but have lost out with the bof and sos nerfs. So over all we're about par with what we were before - not "crap" but still below mids in fg terms. Ofc this is off set by the fact we currently have the relics, which evens it up. Which makes it even more pitiful that many mids are currently hiding away from the world sucking their thumbs
kirennia said:What you doin posting so early
Solarius said:Ever wonder why Hibs run with "only 1" demezzer? Thats right, it's because Hib's second demezz spell is in such a bad line. It would have been nice if we, like Alb and mid, had 2 demezz spells on classes and specs that were first choice (how many mincers don't spec Instruments?). Instead, our "secondary mezzer" is a Mind Mentalist, with the whopping CC options of ST mez and ST stun. Hell, Mind doesn't even offer much for a secondary spec, single target Heal, confusion, ST mez and demezz - hardly inspiring.
And don't suggest running with two bards, getting one bard for RvR is nice but two tends not to happen. After all, Bards are easy to spot, easy to target and usually first dead. Unlike sorcs (who had the same complaint), though, Bards have had little to improve this.
Bracken said:Mid fg is still top of the food chain for fg fights, alb and hibs are equal now, though albs do better against hib groups because hibs haven't adjusted their fg set up to take into account the loss of gp (most still only run with 1 demezzer). Alb fgs have improved with some of the changes (sorc RA for example) but have lost out with the bof and sos nerfs. So over all we're about par with what we were before - not "crap" but still below mids in fg terms. Ofc this is off set by the fact we currently have the relics, which evens it up. Which makes it even more pitiful that many mids are currently hiding away from the world sucking their thumbs
Qbic said:I think if you look at the population of Alb and Mid you will find more Albs sucking their tumbs (even in real life).
Sorry to break the news to you but being more in numbers + relics isn't what I'd call even.
Smilewhenyousaythat said:Perhaps you should try QQing more then - i mean it had such a dramatic impact after you got asses kicked over the relics.
(btw pre NF our pop'n was fine for you - you happily farmed it back then. What happened - did you mislay your tactics and l33t skillz?)
The typical light mentalist spec these days is 46 light 28 ment 4 mana for best RvR or 48 light 24 mana 6 ment for PvE farm. Most mentalists spec for PvE.Flimgoblin said:Don't need to be a mentalism mentalist to demezz - 45 light 28 ment 10 mana, no? get a specline nuker with ranged aoe and pet charm, plus demezz and some backup heals. Surely not that gimp?
Mythic calls ments and minstrels secondary CC - they specifically gave the demezz to primary CCers baseline, and secondary CCers specline.Flimgoblin said:Ment's aint your secondary CC - that's the druid. That's like calling a minstrel secondary CC with their uber aoe mezz
Flimgoblin said:bards have a bit more survivability thanks to having armour/hps and that uber RR5 ability for staying hidden
Flimgoblin said:Don't need to be a mentalism mentalist to demezz - 45 light 28 ment 10 mana, no? get a specline nuker with ranged aoe and pet charm, plus demezz and some backup heals. Surely not that gimp?
Stun nuke nuke is still a rather nice ability
Flimgoblin said:Ment's aint your secondary CC - that's the druid. That's like calling a minstrel secondary CC with their uber aoe mezz