"I" is the 9th of the season I think. They only bother naming them if they're over a certain threshold and they think they might be seriously dangerous. It's raising awareness, I don't see the problem.
edit - although obviously I'm not in Blighty so you people probably get bombarded with it a lot more than me accidentally watching the UK weather after the news.
Yeaaahh...no.
View attachment 31486
No idea, I suppose it makes them easier to reference. And yes also good for the headline writers.Do they need names in order to warn people about them? Seems to be primarily useful for creating newspaper headlines more than actual information.
Eighty mile per hour gusts are not "a bit of wind". All of the named storms so far have had higher wind speeds recorded. They recorded gusts of 96mph just today in the south.Was that from last night's bit of wind then?
But this is the point. There seems to be a different (named) storm pretty much every week, when for the most part, they are just a little bit of wind.
I can understand the annoyance at the storms being named but calling it a "bit of wind" is just wrong.More than 13,000 homes are without power after Storm Imogen brought heavy rain and winds of up to 96mph to parts of southern Britain.
...
Winds of 70-80mph have been recorded in many areas, including 78mph in the Isles of Scilly and 74mph in Mumbles, near Swansea.
What's actually 40mph? 80mph? FYI, 80 is 40 x 2.
I can understand the annoyance at the storms being named but calling it a "bit of wind" is just wrong.
Apparently naming bits of wind and rain came from the Irish MET Office, which kind of makes sense.
Forecasting the weather in Ireland is the easiest job in the world (it's going to be rainy and miserable) so it gives them something to do I guess.
I'm objecting (as have others) to you playing down these named storms as a "bit of wind".mmm. Pot, kettle much?
You are talking about something completely unrelated to my random annoying thing in a desperate attempt to argue with me.
OK then.
I was complaining about this at work today. Such an utterly pointless fad.I might have said this already, but...
The fact we suddenly have to start naming bits of wind. What the fuck? I have no idea what bit of wind we are on now.
Sigh, I should've known you would go back and edit your post (as you are wont to do). You were obviously foaming at the mouth too much to get it all typed out the first time.I say, in the light hearted, random annoying things thread that the concept of naming weak storms (as agreed, 40mph, not 80 - no idea where you got that figure from)
You start banging on about 96mph winds
Not having cycled in high winds before, I imagine as soon as you get a little bit broadside of it, you're up the creek.
I'm trying but I'm honestly struggling to visualise that...Imagine trying to run with opened umbrellas fastened to your knees.