Overdriven
Dumpster Fire of The South
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2004
- Messages
- 12,757
It's looking good for AMD. Of course wait for reviews but the FPS figures aren't going to be more than a couple of percent out, there's simply no benefit for AMD to blatantly lie about their products. It's starting to look like Nvidia got wind of what the 6000 cards could do and, realising they hadn't built a good enough product, rushed their own cards out as a paper launch with barely any stock to try and snag as many sales as possible before AMD announced.
The amount of people I've seen committing to buying the the 30x0 cards without waiting to see what AMD was going to deliver (funnily enough, at least 1 of them now popping up in this thread encouraging everybody to "wait and see") is ridiculous so I guess their strategy of rushing a product out with a snazzy presentation worked to a point. The problem with paper launches though is that they've pissed a lot of people off (no stock and retailers jacking the prices up) so, assuming the 6000 cards do what AMD says they can, Nvidia might actually have pushed people towards the red team.
And they're cheaper ($500 in the case of the 6900 XT vs the ridiculous 3090) and more efficient as well. The only issue left is drivers but I read that they've brought in a whole new team to oversee the development (because AMD are basically powering both of the next-gen consoles) so it's even looking good on that front.
AMD's Big Navi Benchmarks: 4K and 1440p Numbers for Radeon RX 6800, 6800 XT, 6900 XT
Ampere has reason to worry.www.tomshardware.com
This. Geforce drivers just work.I agree with all the wait and see and driver stability Above.
This. Geforce drivers just work.
I think AMD have a better shot this time as they've been working on DirectX stuff for the new Xbox
Tempted by the 6800xt. But but drivers. 🤪 And dlss