pip said:Had to stop half way through can't watch that shit
tris- said:thats different imo.
the lion eats the gazelle to try live a bit longer. he doesnt maul it to near death, call in the lads and truck it off to his gazelle food emporium to make a few quid.
Never thought you think i was so tough lover not a fighterEeben said:you starting to be soft pip?
tris- said:the lad directly said he would go without them if it means the pig can stay alive.
which to me is saying he believe not eating a sausage will stop a pig from dieing.
Blackjack said:Just a question here. Do all you vegitarians believe you love animals more, than us people who remain carnivorous? Just out of curiousity
Blackjack said:Just a question here. Do all you vegitarians believe you love animals more, than us people who remain carnivorous? Just out of curiousity
- English - said:I dont judge anyone for eating meat. As i said, i just personally dont agree with it. Say what you want to try persuade my mind, but I cannot change.
Blackjack said:no no, this has nothing to do with meat or no meat. I really do want an answer to my question Do you believe you love animals more than people who are not vegitarians?
- English - said:I feel its about animal welfare and their right to life like ours (laugh if you want )
Congax said:Damn you, dolphinsandwich!
..?
Golena said:This bit has always puzzled me..
Should you stop a fox from killing a bunch of chickens for food. Either the chickens die because the fox eats them, or the fox dies through hunger. There's not really a "don't hurt an animal" way to resolve it. Nature relies on animals eating other animals.
It's your choice and i'm certainly not going to tell you your wrong, i've just never really understood the argument. If humans stopped eating animals then it wouldn't mean lots more animals got to live, it would just mean different animals got to live.
crispy said:Well i heard they put em together with salmon (thats tune right? ) on cans!
Eeben said:you know tuna is a fish?
- English - said:I suppose its just a self belief thing. Perhaps something on the line about feeling guilty of killing an animal to eat.
J s p said:Think it's funny do ya?
How about i stick a machete through your leg and we will see who's laughing then!
Golena said:I've also wondered why killing a pig is different to killing a carrot. The only scientific difference between the 2 things is the pig is able to move about further on it's own.
Golena said:I've also wondered why killing a pig is different to killing a carrot. The only scientific difference between the 2 things is the pig is able to move about further on it's own.
Hmm, I can't completely agree with that. Before the animal is born, it doesn't exist. There is no state before life which can be compared to the state of the living creature. This means that you can't really say it's better off living a short life to be killed for food afterwards, since there's no point of comparison. A life worth living is not just a life that's better compared to not living at all. Even though the only option not to live a 'worthless' life is death, this doesn't mean the state of death is better than the state of a worthless life; the two can't be compared.Golena said:The truth is probably closer to, not eating a sausage will mean the farmer breeds one less pig next year. It's the biggest flaw in the "not eating meat saves animals" argument that vegatarians use. Not eating meat produced in un-humane manners probably does the animals in question much better than just not eating it at all if you actually look at the whole picture.