At least we get Foundation as a first for TV.So this year we're getting a LOTR remake, a Dune remake and Foundation. Good to see modern SF and fantasy doing so well! /sarcasm
So this year we're getting a LOTR remake, a Dune remake and Foundation. Good to see modern SF and fantasy doing so well! /sarcasm
At least we get Foundation as a first for TV.
Marvel's all fantasy - it's just not swords (much). Scarlett Witch is so far on the "just fucking magic, not even advanced tech" scale that it goes full Harry Potter too...
LOTR is a prequel rather than remake isn't it? Not to take away from the original point, which still stands, but just want to know.
Its funny, I'm not a massive Netflix fan, most of the platform is full of true crime garbage, but at least they try push new IP now and then; Amazon play it extremely safe, Disney are all about the brands, and HBO are somewhere in the middle.
Edit - just checked - it is, it's set in the second age. The LoTR books are in the third age.
Should be middle earth second age or somethingEven the Marvel movies are based on really old characters and stories; Infinity War is what, 40 years old?
Why the fuck are they calling it Lord of The Rings then? Brand recognition bullshit. Unfortunately it demonstrates my point; brand trumps content time after time.
With the emphasis on the "or something".Should be middle earth second age or something
While LOTR may have the brand recognition with the general public and all of the Amazon advertising money being spent on it. However its actually the Wheel of Time series that many fantasy fans are more eager to see and Amazon are keeping its production extremely secretive. My guess is it will either be a sleeper hit or crash and burn.
11 books or so and the author died before the last one was finished. I have ten sitting on my shelf and just debating on reading them again after 20 yearsWhile LOTR may have the brand recognition with the general public and all of the Amazon advertising money being spent on it. However its actually the Wheel of Time series that many fantasy fans are more eager to see and Amazon are keeping its production extremely secretive. My guess is it will either be a sleeper hit or crash and burn.
To quote Boris Johnson - that's "chicken feed" to Bezos.$1billion isn't it?
11 books or so and the author died before the last one was finished. I have ten sitting on my shelf and just debating on reading them again after 20 years
Well that last book, actually three it was so long, was completed by Brian Sanderson based on the authors original notes. Unless you know about the series it's hard to describe what a monumental task that was. The general consensus is that while not perfect he did a great job bringing it all together at the end.
i got distinct impression Robert Jordan had issues with women
After re-reading them recently when final book came out (read others as a teen) i got distinct impression Robert Jordan had issues with women, they were written better in final book i felt, less tugging of braids
I don't think he had an issue with women but rather he wasn't particularly a good writer of them. Pretty much the core plot of the series is about that fact if the two sexes don't work together and have equality the world breaks. Saying that though it's an extremely popular series with women because despite the sometimes stereotypical characterisation it has one hell of a female cast and plot lines for them.
I honestly don't get why people try to mark such content based on very modern values and present day society. Two world wars where a vast majority of men had to march off into battle whilst women kept 'the home fires burning'. Political/ society extolling messages of honour and duty. Plus the books were based on the theme of Celtic heroes in mythical lands.
Can't we just let the writers be and accept the work was a product of its time. Painting Tolkien as a sexist that had issues with women is speculation at best.
No one is perfect, far from it but no need to put these awful modern labels on them.
But, frankly, who cares?I could wax lyrical for ages about how great LoTR & Tolkein are, but how many women are there in that story? Eowyn is the most mentioned women in the series, with her name appearing 125 times. For context, a talking tree gets 161 mentions, and a horse gets namechecked 70 times. Galadriel is the only other female character named over 50 times. Arwen, the main love interest of one of the main male characters, is mentioned a whooping 19 times.
I honestly don't get why people try to mark such content based on very modern values and present day society. Two world wars where a vast majority of men had to march off into battle whilst women kept 'the home fires burning'. Political/ society extolling messages of honour and duty. Plus the books were based on the theme of Celtic heroes in mythical lands.
Can't we just let the writers be and accept the work was a product of its time. Painting Tolkien as a sexist that had issues with women is speculation at best.
No one is perfect, far from it but no need to put these awful modern labels on them.
If you want to find something along those linesJust watch High Score on Netflix, really interesting and bought back some great memories.