Rubbish.I'm astounded as to how the parents would let their children be with a grown ass man alone for a long period of time. Gross neglience right there.
I'm astounded as to how the parents would let their children be with a grown ass man alone for a long period of time. Gross neglience right there.
If you been through the courts twice with allegations they might at least have a talk with you about it and set boundaries.Rubbish.
Most child abuse happens within families. I'm a grown-ass man. Given that I'm more likely to be an abuser of family members than a random, should my sister have never have left her daughters in my care?
Rubbish.
Most child abuse happens within families. I'm a grown-ass man. Given that I'm more likely to be an abuser of family members than a random, should my sister have never have left her daughters in my care?
Why has it taken 30 years for Jackson to be unmasked? Here in the UK we were all asking the same question after Jimmy Savile.
Leaving Neverland is a humble attempt to change that, and light a beacon for those who, when the time is right, may wish to break their silence and confront their abuser, alive or dead.
I've underlined the important part of your post @Exioce.The director of the documentary has an opinion piece today that may be relevant to this thread.
I’m shocked by those who still won’t accept Michael Jackson as abuser
Nice exemplary point - What does it matter? DNA evidence is not 100% reliable, and he's long dead. What do we learn?There's a thing Jack the Ripper suggesting that they've found the person that did it through DNA.
My mate commented on facebook (jokingly) 'He aint alive to defend himself though'
Nice exemplary point - What does it matter? DNA evidence is not 100% reliable, and he's long dead. What do we learn?
Jack the Ripper is now a tourist attraction. The most important thing to do with him now is to keep a narrative in people's minds because it's a fascinating story that gets people to pony up money visiting London, buying books, watching TV series etc. etc.etc.
It's fuck all to do with justice.
Just like the MJ piece is now fuck all to do with that either.
If you read what I've said above, rather than working yourself up into a hissy fit, then you'll clearly see I've not said that at all.I just can't believe you think the investigation into Jimmy Saville was a waste of time lol.
From the articleIt's an opinion piece about the cycle of abuse.
What is your opinion on MJ after watching the documentary @Job?
My opinion?...its sensationalist and intended to make money for all involved
From the article
With Jackson we have, uniquely, witnessed an entire life of abuse played out in front of our eyes, in which the once-adorable little boy, whose father notoriously physically abused him, grew up to become himself the most notorious abuser in modern music.
If he was alive that would be libel right there.
My opinion?...its sensationalist and intended to make money for all involved
Going to take this to mean that you refuse to watch the documentary, due to fear that your opinion of Michael Jackson may be swayed by watching it. Correct me if I'm wrong.I have no idea whatsoever, many celebrities who knew him have called him celibate and non sexual, Macaully has defended him, the only people he has supposed to a have abused are young children who have strangely been introduced to him by their parents, even after the first trial, they were there again.
Its suspicious both ways.
I refuse to be swayed by edited, scripted , sensationalist accusations not under oath, by people who in to make a LOT of money out of it.
Hitler died before he could face a trial. His reputation shouldn't be dragged through the mud either.
Courts or GTFO.
Hitlers crimes are hardly just alleged, his instructions are documented and collaborated by hundreds.Different times for different crimes, alleged or not.