Andrilyn said:Yeah lets make the population even more spread out.
It's time they merge more servers not create more pointless ones which have a max lifespan of 3 months.
Xiane said:As in the last poll it was so popular to bring back OF why not make a new server?
Glastonbury is dieing a slow death cause its basically the same as a normal server without the TOA bouneses.
Phooka said:I actually thought classic server would have been of and just SI, thats why its called classic non? Dont think they will do this
[HB]Jpeg said:tis the hib zergs IMO that are killing glast ... not the "normal server without toa bonus' '" factor .
i'd like to see some sorta safety flag introduced .. but it has a few settings with it...dont know if its possible but i would like to think it could work like this...
in daoc we got 4 kinds of player
the 8v8 player
the 1v1 player
the zerg player
the pve'r
lets take the soloer as example.
he can stick his solo flag on .. so when he is flagged as solo ,, he can only be attacked by a certain amount of players at any one time... lets say 2 for example... hence if the soloer came across a fg they couldnt wipe him out cos there is 8 in that group.
if a fg has GROUP FLag on and they was fignting fairly vs another fg ... NO fg's could add and attack them due to it being a 8v8 encounter where flags have activated for those 1st two groups nwhome engaged each other.
for zerg v zerg maybe the keeps/towers and relic storage areas have a radius so any1 in that radius regardless of there flag status can be zerged etc etc "this would cancel out fg's abusing the flag system by running into a zerg knowing the zerg cant harm them .
im sure this kinda thing would be possible "they have safety flags in pvp server" and they have the keep radius thing for when we /release lord at keeps.
this way everybody hasa a chance to play DAOC the way THEY ENJOY IT.. 1v1 .. 8v8 or zergs .
any1 else think this would be a good thing?
ideally a soloers bg would be awesome .. but in a solo bg even tho cant grp u will still have a duo's running in tandem ungrpd.pez said:thats all very well but its just not rvr
i would rather people who relaly wanted 1v1s had an instance to go to or maybe a bg where you can't group
personally i don't mind soloing in the rvr areas. If i am really bothered about adds i just move away from Beno
[HB]Jpeg said:tis the hib zergs IMO that are killing glast ... not the "normal server without toa bonus' '" factor .
i'd like to see some sorta safety flag introduced .. but it has a few settings with it...dont know if its possible but i would like to think it could work like this...
in daoc we got 4 kinds of player
the 8v8 player
the 1v1 player
the zerg player
the pve'r
lets take the soloer as example.
he can stick his solo flag on .. so when he is flagged as solo ,, he can only be attacked by a certain amount of players at any one time... lets say 2 for example... hence if the soloer came across a fg they couldnt wipe him out cos there is 8 in that group.
if a fg has GROUP FLag on and they was fignting fairly vs another fg ... NO fg's could add and attack them due to it being a 8v8 encounter where flags have activated for those 1st two groups nwhome engaged each other.
for zerg v zerg maybe the keeps/towers and relic storage areas have a radius so any1 in that radius regardless of there flag status can be zerged etc etc "this would cancel out fg's abusing the flag system by running into a zerg knowing the zerg cant harm them .
im sure this kinda thing would be possible "they have safety flags in pvp server" and they have the keep radius thing for when we /release lord at keeps.
this way everybody hasa a chance to play DAOC the way THEY ENJOY IT.. 1v1 .. 8v8 or zergs .
any1 else think this would be a good thing?
Shike said:its an ok idea but, you have to take into account that a rr11grp, will wipe the floor with a rr3grp, unless those rr11s are morons.
Would require a pointsystem where ml+RR gives a value, added to a groups pool, put maxnr of points in a group of 100. rr3ml1 is worth 10 points, rr11ml10 is worth 15 points. Wouldnt be hard to come up with a decent formula for it to make it balanced.
Yes, im actually suggesting larger groups than 8, for the lowbies. Then, your suggested system will work out very well I believe and I'd love to see it ingame too.
[HB]Jpeg said:tis the hib zergs IMO that are killing glast ... not the "normal server without toa bonus' '" factor .
i'd like to see some sorta safety flag introduced .. but it has a few settings with it...dont know if its possible but i would like to think it could work like this...
in daoc we got 4 kinds of player
the 8v8 player
the 1v1 player
the zerg player
the pve'r
lets take the soloer as example.
he can stick his solo flag on .. so when he is flagged as solo ,, he can only be attacked by a certain amount of players at any one time... lets say 2 for example... hence if the soloer came across a fg they couldnt wipe him out cos there is 8 in that group.
if a fg has GROUP FLag on and they was fignting fairly vs another fg ... NO fg's could add and attack them due to it being a 8v8 encounter where flags have activated for those 1st two groups nwhome engaged each other.
for zerg v zerg maybe the keeps/towers and relic storage areas have a radius so any1 in that radius regardless of there flag status can be zerged etc etc "this would cancel out fg's abusing the flag system by running into a zerg knowing the zerg cant harm them .
im sure this kinda thing would be possible "they have safety flags in pvp server" and they have the keep radius thing for when we /release lord at keeps.
this way everybody hasa a chance to play DAOC the way THEY ENJOY IT.. 1v1 .. 8v8 or zergs .
any1 else think this would be a good thing?
Chimaira said:nope because whatever we think bout different stuff its the factor you dont know what comin to ya that keeps the game alive
if you are 100% sure you get fair fights all the time. you have fun for a month then get bored.
Glacier said:Fourthleh!
Shut the fuck up.
Anyone that thinks the 'classic' servers were a good thing for the game needs their head examined.Thadius said:Anyone that thinks they can compete on cluster without a buffbot needs their head examined.
Svartmetall said:Anyone that thinks the 'classic' servers were a good thing for the game needs their head examined.
Duh, splitting the playerbase. 'Classic' servers were the stupidest thing Mythic ever did.Thadius said:How so?
Thadius said:How so?
Classic is a more level playing field than the "you must have a buffbot" to compete on Cluster. Not to mention you need to be toaed to do so.
Svartmetall said:Duh, splitting the playerbase. 'Classic' servers were the stupidest thing Mythic ever did.