Its not my fault im fat

Louster

One of Freddy's beloved
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
882
OblongChicken said:
Okay, let me see if i understand your point. You're claiming that the attractiveness of fatness is relative to societal factors, and it just happens to be that these days fatness is bad. And this is parallel with the attractiveness of skin colour, which is also relative to societal factors, and the two ARE analagous. Both factors depend on arbitrary variables and that's how they derive their qualitative values. Please correct me if i've misunderstood.
I was simply trying to escape the vagueness of "good" and "bad". My point is that if you look at either of these things from the same perspective, their "relative merits" in terms of that perspective are equal in kind.
From the perspective of pure biology, both weight and skin colour contain inherent good/bad things. This is a fact that's completely isolated from anything else.
From the perspective of attractiveness, the qualitative judgements within this perspective become arbitrary, and are heavily influenced by society and convention.
OblongChicken said:
The thing is, this discussion hasn't been about how attractive we find particular skin colours. You're shifting the goalposts. It's been about the apples and oranges of assigning a qualitative value to the attractiveness of fatness and not assigning a qualitative value to skin colour (not NOTE the attractiveness of skin colour, just what the colour is) because skin colour doesn't have a qualitative value in the same manner that fatness has
Basically I'm saying that, with what I've quoted above, you're mixing perspectives. Your "qualitative" judgement of "fatness" is a combination of both "attractiveness" and "biological value", and your judgement of "skin colour" seems to be essentially "worth of that person", or some other unspecified and vague perspective. You have to define in what way you're making your judgements. Saying that "skin colour doesn't have a qualitative value" is false in terms of both attractiveness (which is arbitrary) and biology (which isn't) but is true if you consider "a person's worth", which is why I brought that up. You're comparing different ways of looking at different features, which is why they don't mesh.

OblongChicken said:
I think you're blurring a lot of distinct lines in your argument.
Heh, if you ask me, I'm trying to clarify a lot of things that were blurry to begin with.

But I'm glad you've abandoned the idea that it's a fundamental truth, and yes, I do happen to agree that, in the present, "fatness" tends to be regarded as "inferior" for whatever reason. I'm not saying I necessarily agree that that should be the case ideally, however.
 

maxi

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
460
OblongChicken said:
Okay, i am willing to retract that it's something fundamental to the psyche. But ask yourself honestly: how many fat people would choose to remain fat if they were offered an athletic, fit body?


You cannot ask yourself this question and answer honestly. You can only speculate, unless you've already gathered the information to back up your Question/Answer. You CAN however ask yourself "if i were fat would i want a fit atheletic body" The question is not specific to fat people either, and I don't see the relevence. I'm skinny and I would NOT trade my body for a fit/athletic one...other skinny people might. I'm sexy as i am thanks!

and er...for the 4th time...anyone actually know any/many people who moan about their weight yet do nothing? etc etc
 

OblongChicken

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 18, 2004
Messages
68
Actually, it was nath who was mixing perspectives when assuming weight and skin colour to be analagous.

Although i'm enjoying the depth of this discussion, i think unravelling and defining all the concepts we're referring to wouldn't, well, be worth the time. When you start boring yourself, then you know you've got to stop...

I'm proud of myself for resisting the temptation to dive into another 500 word post.
 

Driwen

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
932
OblongChicken said:
Anyway, you're just giving up cos yer losing...

just to annoy you, a quote of yourself :p. And basically everything has already been said twice, so I agree that really going on with this discussion is pointless.
 

Louster

One of Freddy's beloved
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
882
OblongChicken said:
Actually, it was nath who was mixing perspectives when assuming weight and skin colour to be analagous.

This is what I'm saying, though. Viewed using the same frame of reference (which is essential when comparing anything) then yes, they are analogous. They are both biologically important, and both can have implications for a person's health, which is where the qualitative judgements lie ("good" = "healthy", "bad" = "unhealthy"). And on the other hand, they both carry social implications (attractiveness), and qualitative judgements for both, in this respect, are arbitrary ("good" = "subjective", "bad" = "subjective").
 

JBP|

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 19, 2003
Messages
1,360
OblongChicken said:
But ask yourself honestly: how many fat people would choose to remain fat if they were offered an athletic, fit body?


Having had/been both ill stick with "chubby" thanks, as i am a much happier and nicer person to be around
 

GekuL

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
405
You're all just arguing for the sake of it now surely?

Fat people are obviously less attractive to the majority, I don't think that can be in doubt. How many beauties like this are in the babe of the day thread for example?

obese.jpg

(if you wouldn't, you're obviously fattist?)

The comparison drawn with skin colour is a joke for a number of reasons. It can't be compared with racism because there is no mention of assumed abilities and personality. People already express their preference for skin tone without being labelled racist, just as they do with hair colour.
The cosmetic differences are small and only slightly influence preference, especially when compared with the difference between normal and obese people. The analogy is so ludicrous in my opinion, I can't believe you have managed to write so much about it. It's like saying you must be a homophobe because you don't find men attractive.

The number of diets and attention on dieting suggests there are a lot of people unhappy with their weight. As long as this generalised perception isn't projected on to individuals I don't see what the problem is?
 

Jupitus

Old and short, no wonder I'm grumpy!
Staff member
Moderator
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,294
JBP| said:
Having had/been both ill stick with "chubby" thanks, as i am a much happier and nicer person to be around


My chubby belly >>> your chubby belly :kissit:
 

Wazzerphuk

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
12,054
I'm officially bored of the usage of the word arbitrary in this thread.

NO MORE OR I SHALL UNLEASH BAB'S SAQ!
 

throdgrain

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
7,197
Im officially bored of, well, this FUCKING THREAD TO BE HONEST!!

Fat people are funny , get over it ;)
 

leggy

Probably Scottish
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
3,838
throdgrain said:
Im officially bored of, well, this FUCKING THREAD TO BE HONEST!!

Fat people are funny , get over it ;)

I bet your one of those people who put on a telly programme and complain about it instead of turning it off. Then you write to some broadcasting watchdog to complain about it offending your principles. :)
 

leggy

Probably Scottish
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
3,838
I meant 'you're'

Before the Zieg Heil Grammar Squad arrive at the scene.
 

Sprock

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 28, 2003
Messages
4
I love fat people, yeah I do.

See, they are part of a secret government plan, part of a secret energy store. When peak oil hits, fat people will be herded up and melted down and converted to petrol so the rest of us can continue to drive our big SUV's in the manner we are accustomed too - neat eh?

So.....I recommend that everyone buy a fat person a triple cheesburger today (they are always hungry right) and keep this great countries energy reserves topped up.

btw, if my theory isn't correct, why is it then that it's ilegal to sell a drunk a drink but not ilegal to sell a fat person a McDonalds eh eh?
 

old.user4556

Has a sexy sister. I am also a Bodhi wannabee.
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
16,163
Non-camp gay men are very nice people; i have a gay friend and you have no idea he's gay at all - top bloke.

Overly camp, bitchy men (elton john / graham norton / those camp gay interior designers) - annoying, much in the same way that theatrical bitchy women are annoying - not really anything to do with them being gay, although the gayness makes them theatrical and camp.
 

OblongChicken

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 18, 2004
Messages
68
I wonder if this will provoke a furor too, but...

I can't stand camp people. They're so fucking annoying. True.
 

old.user4556

Has a sexy sister. I am also a Bodhi wannabee.
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
16,163
don't see anything wrong with not liking camp people - you get camp straight men too.

If you say you don't like gays, that's a bit non-pc. You're entitled to your opinion though :).
 

Munkey

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
1,326
My friends camp, he's not gay but he's camp. Still a great guy nonetheless
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom