Gordonax said:IF that's true then things have changed a lot in the couple of weeks I've been offline. Before they lost the relics, Mids regularly brought 50-60 to retake towers and/or keeps.
gwal said:i know the difference I place, yeah... but who am i to decide whats right and wrong for others.
and who are YOU to decide it. if you are as intelligent as you expect me to be, then id assume you to know, that not everyone cares about money - but everyone cares bout competition (more or less anyways).
i played magic the gathering for quite a while, and took it rather seriously... simply cause i wanted to be amongst the best, as did a lot of other ppl i know, and have seen. there was some money involved, but only for the very best, most tournaments only had some cards to be won.
where does this rank in your system? was i contemptible when i discussed strategies, opponents, and tech, even tho there was only a few pieces of cardboard to be won - or was it ok, cause there was a slight chance id make it to the money?
and what about the millionaire that plays.. whatever... baseball. can he act like he is better than others if he rly is, or cant he take it seriously cause theres nothing at stake for him, except money which he has plenty of alrdy?
Edaemos said:Mids had 60+ in the bold tower they were camping after midnight last night when they put a hole in bold
Phule_Gubben said:60? are u absolutely sure about that number? If so I'm really amased
But that was maybe 1 hour in to the battle, after that the numbers decreased steadily.
gwal said:i know the difference I place, yeah... but who am i to decide whats right and wrong for others.
and who are YOU to decide it. if you are as intelligent as you expect me to be, then id assume you to know, that not everyone cares about money - but everyone cares bout competition (more or less anyways).
i played magic the gathering for quite a while, and took it rather seriously... simply cause i wanted to be amongst the best, as did a lot of other ppl i know, and have seen. there was some money involved, but only for the very best, most tournaments only had some cards to be won.
where does this rank in your system? was i contemptible when i discussed strategies, opponents, and tech, even tho there was only a few pieces of cardboard to be won - or was it ok, cause there was a slight chance id make it to the money?
and what about the millionaire that plays.. whatever... baseball. can he act like he is better than others if he rly is, or cant he take it seriously cause theres nothing at stake for him, except money which he has plenty of alrdy?
Harthai said:lol ,powerful classes? forget the sorc for a sec did you?
Best ToA items? forget that albs have the highest numbers therefore they can easily get any toa item just by doing a quick /who 50 and asking?
Practice as a full group? you got zergs...which most albs might not realise but is just a number of fg's together who are too afraid to roam too far away from zerg?
Who's good? Hibs are good ,Mids are good
Who's not? The rest...
Let's see you take it then.
Bracken said:I haven't decided anything for anyone. My original post which you picked up on was about the arrogance of belittling current players compared to previous players and how silly it is be obsessed with proving who are the "best" players simply because it usually doesn't stop there
Eemma said:What's so silly trying to prove my point of view? It has nothing to do with ''obsesses'' I'm simply bored when im on FH so why not just post my opinion? be it lame or not.
Originally Posted by Bracken
All this shit about who sucks, who zergs, who adds etc etc...it's bollox. That crap has nothing to do with discussing tactics or saying someone plays well - it's way beyond any reasonable line and it comes from getting this game completely out of context. Any sensible person would understand that, and would also understand that the principle applies in any walk of life.