BloodOmen
I am a FH squatter
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2004
- Messages
- 18,634
Did/Does anyone actually say that? In both scenarios? While I certainly saw "Singapore of Europe" bullshit during the Brexit debate, it was never any kind of official claim and could be dismissed as hyperbole by anyone with two braincells to rub together. The Brexiteers (the more lucid ones anyway) were more about freedom of opportunity than magic money trees; they just forgot we don't live in the 19th century anymore.We weren't stinking fucking rich before we left, and we're not stinking fucking rich now. The main argument for leaving was that we'd be stinking fucking rich if we left, and the main argument is we'll be stinking fucking rich if we rejoin.
And so was your rhetoric.Both arguments are lies.
![]()
'A Whole Civilization Will Die Tonight,' Warns Nobel Peace Prize Hopeful
Donald Trump escalated his threats against Iran, writing that "a whole civilization will die tonight" if the nation doesn't open the Strait of Hormuz.www.rollingstone.com
Nobel Piece of Shit prize.
It's just the usual bollocks, his mates will all be making a mint from his market manipulation.
They won't but the next government should audit the previous government and all of its connections to blatant insider trading.
They won't, because they're all complicit.
He doesn't want peace, if it means he loses face. Regardless of the human cost.
I seem to remember a bus with 350m/week drawn on the side and 90bn/year has just been bandied about. I find it difficult to equate that with me "lying".And so was your rhetoric.
350M a week for the NHS isn't "we're all going to be rich". And I don't remember anything from the leave campaign about 90bn in benefits, and I definitely have heard nothing about rejoining making us rich, so, on balance...I seem to remember a bus with 350m/week drawn on the side and 90bn/year has just been bandied about. I find it difficult to equate that with me "lying".
I don't disagree with most of the rest of your assessment though. Just the bit where you think I'm willfully deceiving freddyshouse members.![]()
350m/week was exactly that - it was "we'll be financially much better off" - instead of sending all our cash to fund Europe - lets sent it to the NHS instead. It was a carefully crafted lie which effectively said "we'll be rolling in it - we hand over loads of our cash to the EU".350M a week for the NHS isn't "we're all going to be rich". And I don't remember anything from the leave campaign about 90bn in benefits, and I definitely have heard nothing about rejoining making us rich, so, on balance...
Nah, bollocks. None of those things are "we're going to be rich". They're just not.350m/week was exactly that - it was "we'll be financially much better off" - instead of sending all our cash to fund Europe - lets sent it to the NHS instead. It was a carefully crafted lie which effectively said "we'll be rolling in it - we hand over loads of our cash to the EU".
The 90bn in benefits is the "rejoin" campaign. I mean, we're not officially campaigning but just like people were scratching and scratching for fucking years, then got their opportunity when Cameron made his fucking ridiculous play - it's the same playbook.
It's not me inventing things here. That's the messaging.
To a lot of people, that's how it rolled. I heard them say it often enough. Definitely enough to sway the vote. Not individually rich, of course, but significantly better off as a country.Nah, bollocks. None of those things are "we're going to be rich". They're just not.