Halloween Werewolf (now over)

[old.Tohtori]

Well ofcourse not me, well, i could vote for myself just out of spite, inactionman is clean enough, you as a vigilante is VERY suspicious(depends if i believe there can be two), aph3x, well, i've had my doubts that way and the "no result" didn't help.

So basically...hell...it's a 50/50 chance to vote(from my POV) if i trust you

 

[old.Tohtori]

if me, you , inaction vote for Jup, then hes toast. cos theres only 2 wolves, so his mate may try to not vote for him = too obvious, so may let him burn at this stage. and i cant imagine the special role wins if the wolves do?

6 people, 4 votes needed

 

[Mabs]

well i didnt vote for tdc and he was innocent

and ive admitted shooting eca, which wasnt a clever thing to do, but wth

 

[Mabs]

6 people, 4 votes needed

yes but if 3 of us vote for him, and one of the others goes "oh noes you cant do that", then we got both our wolves

so his running mate prob wont block the vote - otherwise hes outed, so would prob cut the losses at this stage and go with it to avoid being next
=4
and the special role i assume isnt going to win unless the wwolves dies?
=5

 

[old.Tohtori]

well i didnt vote for tdc and he was innocent

and ive admitted shooting eca, which wasnt a clever thing to do, but wth

Thing is, there's nothing to prove or disprove you as the 2nd shooter(pun). You could claim it to avoid the pyre, and since it's after the shot, well you might just grab the specials place ass the special wouldn't dispute you.

But giving you an ounce of benefit of doubt, learned something from TdC incident.

yes but if 3 of us vote for him, and one of the others goes "oh noes you cant do that", then we got both our wolves

so his running mate prob wont block the vote - otherwise hes outed, so would prob cut the losses at this stage and go with it to avoid being next
=4
and the special role i assume isnt going to win unless the wwolves dies?
=5

Unless there's only 2 wolves to start with and UNLESS the special is a SK type which can win solo.

Big if's there.

But yeah, IF jup is a wolf, and there is a second wolf, he would have a hard time with 3 votes on jup. On the other hand, if jup is innocent, we're serving one big pile of free stew.

 

[Mabs]

if there is only one more wolf, we do have a vote in hand, as it were

but i still think we need to purge people in order

 

[old.Tohtori]

Yes but that order, if not alphabetical, is totally dependent on the perceptions and opinions

It's never easy is it.

BUT, here's my "list":

Aph3x not voting for TdC. This is suspicious because our seer, and evne our doctor, thought he was guilty, yet aph3x kept quiet and just let things happen, leaving him "in the clear". When it's added to the "no result" of iactiveman, well, my suspicion meter is bouncing in the "hazard" zone.

Jupitus, for reasons yesterday. Seems town wanted him dead as much as TdC. Could we REALLY be so wrong about two people in row?

Mabs, well, yesterdays reasoning kinda fell apart with ECA being good and TdC being good... but also the second vigilante claim is suspicious, as everything is.

Mystic, i thought he was a doc, due to post here and there, but now that the doc is dead, i'm inclined to look at it from another perspective and it odesn't look too "nice" as Mystic has been there, advocating death at each innocent burnination.

Have to check back on first wolf-e-que to see what i've missed though.

 

[old.Tohtori]

Just noticed that in gohans case, Aph3x advocated for burning gohan, but at the "last minute" pulled his vote off. Same as yesterday, quiet down to let the burnination happen.

Seems like a pattern. With Calaen ofcourse noone had a choice but to vote that way, since who would want to o against the seer(poor TdC proved this) so APh3x went there with the rest.

Aph3x has done two things basically, vote for Jup for whatever reason and "seem" to agree with decicions then pull off at last moment to cover own hiney.

If that hiney is furry or something else, i don't know, but i'm gonna go with a gut feel:

Vote: Aph3x

 

[old.Tohtori]

Though i did promise TdC that i'd go after Jup...

Morals or gut?!

 

[MYstIC G]

mystic=wolf

Afraid I'm not old china. Plain and simple, since turn 1, bandwagon has kept my lowly human arse alive.

Personally as a villager I think Jup is the most likely candidate to be the wolf so he needs to go. He's been making people look dodgy all game by follow voting and the like and he seemed very keen when TdC took his tumble, so:

Vote: Jup

To explain my part in TdC's death, I voted for him in two rounds because when I voted for him the first one, i.e. before he was lynched, he repped me with "lol", so after that I didn't trust him. So afaic he's only dead cos of his f'kn stupid mind games! (READ THAT BEYOND THE GRAVE MAN!)

By the way Mabs I'm also not convinced that you're a simple vigilante as I don't believe that there were two.

I'm starting to think you're the special and that your ability is that you can use powers from others once they are dead (halloween and all).

For example now TdC is toast you have chosen to be a vigilante and earlier when Uara (wolf) died I think you chose to be a human-wolf hybrid killing thing.

I'm presuming that your win condition is kill everything else, so being able to shoot people or maul people = win. On that basis you need players with killing powers to die, as what use to you is being a doctor?

Personally I think you're hedging your bets. Based on your own list

mabs=vigil
jup= wolf
mystic=wolf
inaction = seer
aph3x = special
toht = villager

this fits because you are the special so you're protecting your identity by assigning it to someone else (Aph3x). After that you think that either me or Jup are wolfy but you aren't sure, so to be certain of being able to go human-wolf next round you're getting one of us lynched (Jup) and after that you'll use your current Vigilante powers to shoot me?

Maybe I'm just paranoid.

 

[Mabs]

1- you seem to know an awful lot about this special role mystic G....

2- vigils only get one shot, hence why i "came out"

3- i did say the list was assumptions partly

4- no you arent paranoid, they are out to get you

 

[old.Tohtori]

Unvote Aph3x

Mystic i hate your logic at times

 

[MYstIC G]

Sorry Toht, but I'm working on the basis that the only person I trust for certain is inactionman. He took the step to tell us who he was and readily admitted that now this village is sans doctor he's fucked. He's got no reason to lie about that as its just put a noose around his neck.

I'm even more inclined to distrust Mabs now you've withdrawn your vote because if you were the special it seems unlikely that you'd care about my arguements.

Basically if you were the special, at the moment I think the special is mabs and mabs thinks its Aph3x, so if it were you then surely it would have been much easier for you to sit on the sidelines?

 

[Mabs]

im pretty sure jup is a wolf, but he might be the special

but havent we all agreed that whatever he is, jup is furtive? so if we burn him we might clear this up a bit... ?

 

[old.Tohtori]

Sorry Toht, but I'm working on the basis that the only person I trust for certain is inactionman. He took the step to tell us who he was and readily admitted that now this village is sans doctor he's fucked. He's got no reason to lie about that as its just put a noose around his neck.

I'm even more inclined to distrust Mabs now you've withdrawn your vote because if you were the special it seems unlikely that you'd care about my arguements.

Basically if you were the special, at the moment I think the special is mabs and mabs thinks its Aph3x, so if it were you then surely it would have been much easier for you to sit on the sidelines?

When looked at that angle, yes. If i was the special, i wouldn't care who burns really. And i don't trust anyone except inactionman either. Especially now that you proved not to be the doctor(which was my main thought at first).

The "wait in sidelines" is why i'm doubtful of Aph3x though, seems so convenient to just wait until we're down to 2 people.

But your arguments against Mabs and my own suspicions is more why i unvoted 'cause i want some time to think these through.

Mabs, if we burn Jup and he's special, and inactionman(atleast) dies at night, we're left with 4 people. That means we got a 3:1 or 2:2 wolf situation and i'd rather be sure we burn a furry then the special.

'cause if ew manage to burn a furry, we got a 1:1:2 situation, or a 1:3 with only the special left.

 

[old.Tohtori]

Regarding tomorrows situation, i know neither scenario looks good, but rather a 1:1:2 with one special and one wolf, then a 2:2 because that means the furries win.

If there's 2 wolves, and we burn a special, the furries win.

 

[old.Tohtori]

Though, have to add, that if we burn a special and the furries DON'T win, we know there's only one furry left

 

[old.Tohtori]

And now that i think of it more(sorry for several posts, can't edit):

If mabs+other is a furry, and has done this calculation, voting for Jup would be in mabs best interest as it doesn't matter if jup is innocent or a special as it's a furry victory, since mabs would know jup is NOT a wolf.

Either case, innocent or special, two wolves vs two villagers is a furry victory.

This only applies if Mabs i a wolf and someone else is a wolf ofcourse.

 

[Jupitus]

So, because I argued vehemently against TdC's furry accusations yesterday when the logs were being prepped for the fire I must therefore be a wolfy? I was defending an innocent's life as best I could! I had no choice but to call for TdC's lynching as he was so clearly, and wrongly I should add, after me

With the reduction in numbers now lynching me will probably hand the wolves a win, so we need a genuine bad guy to stand a chance.

MysticG has been full of excuses when it suits him, but almost silent the rest of the time, watching as we decimate our own ranks with dissent and finger pointing. I say lynch Meg.

Vote: Septic Peg

 

[old.Tohtori]

Out of all the people left, not including inactive, in my opinion Mystic is the least suspicious with all things considered.

Call me a wolfbummer again if you like, but there's just no reason to vote him when weighed against all that's happened and other suspicions.

 

[MYstIC G]

MysticG has been full of excuses when it suits him, but almost silent the rest of the time, watching as we decimate our own ranks with dissent and finger pointing. I say lynch Meg.

No surprise there, I vote for you, you vote for me. That's becoming a consistent action by you Jup. The difference this round is because we're not voting for TdC this time, so suddenly I'm a mute?

I don't see how I'm full of excuses either. I've stuck to my guns throughout with the exception of when the first turn became like wading in treacle. I didn't trust TdC for the reasons above and I stuck to my guns for two rounds. Granted we didn't get a wolf but I've explained that fully and you can have the screenshot of my UserCP as proof if you like but personally I think that will kill the game.

Personally, I want to hear from Aph3x at the moment, but from reading the thread clearly he won't be about until later (banned/blocked IP talk adds nothing to a werewolf game so I believe it).

 

[old.Tohtori]

I think i'll hold on until i've heard a bit more, especially from Aph3x and perhaps Mabs on my comments on the situation and what will happen IF things happen certain way.

If need be, i'll vote for Jup and hope he's no townie.

 

[Aph3x]

Toht if you check back i didnt vote for teedles as I was voting for Jup, i have had suspucions on and off for most of the last two days about him. His vote chasing and casting Tdc in a bad light is whats making me think he is furry.

Also if you check back I was one of the first, if not the first to back Inactionman when he claimed against Calaen, the result of that lynch was 1 dead SK

Im sticking to voting for Jup as I belive is the wolf.

Vote Jupitus

 

[old.Tohtori]

Well i have to think this through, 'cause if there's two wolves voting Jup out, as said, it's good night to town.

Hope you guys don't mind me taking a moment, gonna go home from work and post then.

I'd advice inactionman to think things before voting Jup off too.

Kind of in the hotseat.

 

[Jupitus]

Im sticking to voting for Jup as I belive is the wolf.

... and herein is the issue. I am NOT a wolf

*feels gangbanged*

 

[inactionman]

Ok, got all the information I needed out of that, I didn't actually suspect Jup, I just wanted to see what people would do.

Vote: old.Tohtori

Because he's now trying to slant my scry from last night, and he bandwagoned TdC yesterday and gohan on the first day.

 

[old.Tohtori]

Ok, got all the information I needed out of that, I didn't actually suspect Jup, I just wanted to see what people would do.

Vote: old.Tohtori

Because he's now trying to slant my scry from last night, and he bandwagoned TdC yesterday and gohan on the first day.

I'm not trying to slant your scry, i said that you don't know what it meas that Aph3x didn't give a result.

And might i remind you that you're on both of those bandwagons too, if i'm not mistaken

Not to mention your reasoning was:

Which may be when we start day 2 at this rate! Can we please get a move on? I'm pretty much soley voting for Gohan at the moment because doing so is the best chance for us to get this game moving!

Not to mention:

I don't know, all I can find out is if they are good (on the side of the villagers) or evil. I assume I am some kind of seer-lite.

And now suddenly you can't tell if aph3x is or not good?

If not good then bad right?

I've been defending you from the start, quite avidly i'd add, and i voted TdC partly due to YOUR "he's against me" pointing out.

So what gives hmm? I'm starting to think back on what TdC said about you getting lucky.

 

[old.Tohtori]

Actually, even if this gets me burned, the fact that you said "all I can find out is if they are good (on the side of the villagers) or evil. " and then claim you got nothing conclusive about aph3x, is a mess up in my books.

Do explain.

 

[inactionman]

I didn't get an instruction manual, all I was told is that I can determine whether people are good or evil, I've got one evil (Cal) and two unknowns; Ch3t, a villager, and Aph3x. At first I assumed Ch3t came up unknown because he died, when Aph3x did the same I don't think that's the case.

 

[Mabs]

I didn't get an instruction manual, all I was told is that I can determine whether people are good or evil, I've got one evil (Cal) and two unknowns; Ch3t, a villager, and Aph3x. At first I assumed Ch3t came up unknown because he died, when Aph3x did the same I don't think that's the case.

in that case, we should go aph3x first ? cos he sure as shit aint a villager