Z
zenith_merc
Guest
- Thread starter
- #61
yey
Originally posted by Mavl
You could very well hit with 55th ^^
Originally posted by Tranquil-
But not hitting with 54 arrows indicates a pretty low chance to do that.
Originally posted by kirennia
One question, if you send 53 pets at a target, and I mean ANY human controlled target, would you expect them to come out with 100% health?
Originally posted by dubaxterdrakora
All I can say is have some of your own **** medicine, shooting a scout stealthed with 10 shots (yes from frontal as he was on gate) and blocked every shot stealthed.
So dont come here talking about ***** blocking.
These are stealthers, some of them dont even know what group rvr is, and those that know dont really care.Originally posted by vintervargen
retards, you really trying to nerf guarding? something that actually require a bit of skill in fg rvr..
TT shield size doesnt affect your chance to block ...Originally posted by halgaard
scout use small shields and when buffed we block.. about 75% rougly of the arrows fired, unless using engage there's a huuge diffrence between small and large shields vs. arrows
Originally posted by vintervargen
retards, you really trying to nerf guarding? something that actually require a bit of skill in fg rvr..
Originally posted by necrofill
mavl
dont think u it r alittle to overpwered that u can guard 360 degrees and make the ppl u guard nearly immune against all inc attacks from arrows, 1h and 2h uses? but u can only block inc attack for u self with 180 degrees?? would be more fair if it was the other way around!!
Originally posted by Mavl
no, i dont
btw, care to explain how i can make someone immune to arrows 1h and 2h? i would certanly like to know
Originally posted by Tranquil-
Read. He said nearly immune, which isn't that far off really.
Originally posted by Tranquil-
Read. He said nearly immune, which isn't that far off really.
Originally posted by ab_fluid
ever tried guarding vs and assist train of mercs or savages? guess not
Originally posted by Mavl
You can be nearly immune as you can be nearly pregnant.
Originally posted by Pandemic
Bit of a pointless discussion as Mythic are looking at boosting guard not nerfing it due to its incredibly low chance to block in rvr vs dual weapons
its fun to be an unerfable warrior
Originally posted by Driwen
so you think that almost complete immunity vs a target on a passive?
The warrior didnt need to show any kind of skill, except for the part that his back was against the wall. The only skill in gaurd would be that you need to select which target to gaurd and stay near him (you dont have to face him nor the attacker nor be on the gaurdee's side). Ok you do have to pay attention to who is getting hit, that is if you want to optomise the use of gaurd and switch who you are gaurding with who is getting hit by the assist train.
I dont really mind how gaurd works, as I dont tend to solo attack any shield tank or anyone close to one. But it is a bit powerful to have a passive ability that negates a complete class (the melee of archers, excluding rangers maybe, isnt that great). Shield should be strong vs archers and I think engage is fine, but gaurd shouldnt be as strong as engage. So either the scout was damn unlucky or gaurd is too powerful imo(75% for gaurd might be fine but then probability on missing 54 arrows is one in 5.5 million) .
Originally posted by Tranquil-
Archers shouldn't get penalized 'cause of /assist.
Originally posted by vintervargen
having 50 shield + 11 + rr + moblock should be good. a savage with 50 h2h + 11 + rr + DR hits pretty hard/often no? and savages are fucking passive too, stick + attack ^^
Originally posted by Tranquil-
You can temporarily avoid the obvious by posting pedantic replies, yes, but it only makes it that more obvious.
Originally posted by Tranquil-
Archers shouldn't get penalized 'cause of /assist.
Originally posted by Mavl
I have already explained it to you in my previous posts, if u didnt read it thats clearely your problem
p.s. today i got shot by a scout for 900+ while facing his direction. But wait, i am supposed to be immune ! Nerf!!1!111
Originally posted by Driwen
uhm you arent supposed to be immune and we were talking about gaurd so not yourself. For some reason the one who gets gaurded actually has a higher blockratio than the one who gaurds has for himself (unless he engages ofc).
Originally posted by Aloca
If you realy wanted to hit someone you should have tryed the warrior with shield.
You have even higher chanse to block for someone else than block attacks on you....
If someone have like 50% chanse to block attack on him he have 75% chanse to block for a friend....
(not exact but you get the picture)
Originally posted by elerand
The problem may well stem from guard 3 (base 15%) adding to the base chance to block arrows, that's 45% before adding shield skill, say a rough 30% for 50+10 shield. That's now 75%, factor in MOB and Dex to that, which I believe multiplies rather than adds straight on.
Originally posted by ab_fluid
Shield shouldn't get penalised vs assist trains and dual wield, but it does, live with it
Originally posted by Mavl
I have already explained it(about guard arcs) to you in my previous posts, if u didnt read it thats clearely your problem. I suggest you make a shield tank and try using this wtfpwning overpowered ability in real rvr, mby then i will listen to you. Until then you are simply biased.
Btw you will be able to ignore the bodyguard ability in toa, wtf are whinging at ?
p.s. today i got shot by a scout for 900+ while facing his direction. But wait, i am supposed to be immune ! Nerf!!1!111
And why should shield tanks be penalized against dw chars ?
Why should casters have a <50% power penalty?
Why should qc eat 2x power while its on a timer ?
Why should necros suffer from a blue pet penalty against casters ?
etc etc etc. Live with it.
Originally posted by Tranquil-
Imo dual wield needs toning down and assist trains should be nerfed. Why should I "live with it"? Mythic WANTS feedback, that should be pretty obvious. That I post my meaning here has little bearing on that, but nm that. I'm free to post my meanings just as much as you can whinge yours.