Matriarch|Sneakers
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2003
- Messages
- 1,875
Valgyr said:U are so naive and biased, why do NF only have zerg rvr layout? agramon? solo camp spots, ye briefine could be great IF u had spd, patiance and luck as guards roamed all over the place. now u have all the bridges and docks to camp as solo/stealther. its not good but why is it worse then camping apk mpk? odins was great at times but totallt deserted others so not much diff to as it is now. Fg could take a keep then can do it now, and towers were added so the tower crew had more stuff to do.
Imo OF had alot of nice stuff, but so has NF. Id say WoW, Eve etc had alot more impact then NF vs OF had. ToA made alot more ppl leave then NF did would be my guess.
Daoc was made for Realm vs Realm.Matriarch|Sneakers said:Well since iam so "basied" why don't you make a + and - list on what is so god damn great with NF. If you look into it you will see that the design isn't nothing a like the OF design. NF is fulled of flaws and fuckups. The hot spots is bridges and docks, and the occasinals tower/keep fight which you can port to, how laughable and obvious can it get? NF = zerg, and when there is not a population to hold a zerg there is nothing to do since there is no travel routes, there is irvr and nothing else. Well, guess you enjoy it and I wish you the best.
thats why it sucks xDSamaroon|Terracotta said:You never played OF you tit![]()
well ive not played much OF, many most on the irvr freeshard, maybe its just how crap that server is, but if that server is what OF was like.. rofl.. not great at all.Matriarch|Sneakers said:NF sucks, get over it.
Appollo said:Givf back MTK!
Tafaya Anathas said:When there will be more players on freeshard with OF than "normal" servers Mythic would maybe start to think about it
Ps.: Gifv OF on classic servers![]()