Grits
Fledgling Freddie
- Joined
- May 6, 2010
- Messages
- 60
Overly simplistic tbh. The real US contribution to the specifically British (rather than "Allied") war effort was in the Battle of The Atlantic, and here, the British could have lost the war (and almost did.), even as late as 1943. Its extremely unlikely the Germans could ever have successfully invaded the UK, but they could definitely have forced an armistice (don't forget that's pretty much what brought the Germans to the negotiating table in WWI; they weren't defeated militarily, they were starved into submission).
These forum debates about who won the war are always overly-simplistic; a lot of the key turning points in the war were as much to do with luck and timing as anything else; but there's one truism that always cuts through the arguments; the British gave time, the Soviets gave blood, and the Americans gave treasure. Unfortunately, amongst the allies the British could definitely be said to have lost the war, although even there, it may have been a blessing because we got out of the empire business (which had been loss-making for nearly half a century before WWII) fairly painlessly compared to other empires.
I think this is spot on. I said in my first post here that we Americans got into the fight too late, but we did get into the fight and it made a difference. In addition to the Battle of the Atlantic we also made a huge contribution to the strategic air war over Germany. My point about the Soviets is, yeah they did by far the most damage to Germany in Europe, but they didnt do it because they were an "ally" of the Brits, that was just an unfortunate (for them) side effect, whereas the US was doing it to help their Allies. Churchill was right about Stalin, he was not an Ally he only had a common enemy.