You should know that's how FH rolls , so much gr8ness. I missed your posts because I switched off in that thread.
The Mk3 has been rumoured for a while now, the link I posted goes against all the feelings that we won't see a Mk3 until 2012, but given that this defacto announcement has "EOS" in the title, it's the most compelling evidence yet.
Yeah that's very true; could it be the "video specific" 5D? There's some chatter about them splitting the DSLR line into a more video orientated line and a stills line.
I do hope it's the 5d3 though! And that the EF 200-400mm f/4 L IS USM Extender 1.4x is also out soon so I can go into the shop and drool uncontrollably all over it.
That lens looks daaaaaymn sweet, possibly a bit large to carry around unless you're on a serious wildlife / sports mish. Mind you, they've got it equally covered with the compact weather sealed 70-300mm L which I am very tempted to get.
That canon 200-400mm reminds me of my Sigma 100-300mm I had for my Pentax system. Superb lens with a very practicle focal length, but a touch on the heavy side.
I have the 70-200 f2.8 IS USM (the first one, not the v2) and it makes me sob quietly when I think about how much of the goodness of the lens I am throwing away not only by using it on a crop sensor but by then putting a 1.4x extender on it as well. A 200-400 f4 on a full frame sensor would be sexual in comparison.
Depending on what they do with regards splitting the line into pro video and just stills, the just stills one will be at least £2k probably much more on launch and the 200-400 f4 will be... like... I have no idea Nikon's 200-400 f4 is £5k (on Warehouse Express, probably less at DigitalRev or some such), Canon's will be more because it's their first entry in this range and it has the built-in extender. And it's lovely.
Seeeeeee how much EF lens goodness you throw away when you put it on a crop sensor (blue) and then an 1.4x extender (red) compared to ff loveliness (green).
On the crop and with the 1.4x extender the 70-200 f2.8 becomes equivalent to a 156ish-448 f4 on full-frame. If you put a 200-400 f4 on a fullframe you get all of that lovely big green bit at 400mm at f4 and not just some titchy bit in the centre of the front element. I had a point when I started thinking about this but basically, I want to go full frame!
How many London nerds do we have here? I'm trying to arrange some sort of random walk around. I'm always wandering about anyway, thought I might as well do it with other geeks.
You're welcome to tag along if you want, when I decide on a date.
I came >< that close to buying a new camera today because of YOU PEOPLE. The one I have in mind is a Lumix G2. it's a micro 3/4 chip. Someone tell me why I shouldn't?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.