Of course I haven't done this but the stage 1 remap for my Jaguar XE 25t (Ecoboost version, not Ingenium) would theoretically have gained me 30BHP and 100Nm(!) of torque. Of course I haven't done this but strongly suspect the torque curve would feel much flatter and when in Dynamic mode it would feel like a different car, always ready to give a shed-load of torque. The theoretical downside I imagine would be that loads of torque with reduced lag being put through rear wheels only, on summer tyres, in cold weather, in the wet, would be likely to spin the tyres rather than move you forwards. The other downside might be that if you do it by remapping the ECU rather than an add-in box then you may have to get it re-mapped again if you get a software update during a service.Remapping. Worth it? I really don’t want to join a car forum to ask this question as those forums are just about willy waving so anyone here have any experience?
Cheers
You should be able to get more than 260:Going to book mine in for one after I get back from California later in the month - mine is an N/A Petrol so normally there isn't much use, but BMW strangled mine to clear some air to the 135i Coupe, and is otherwise identical to the engine in the 130i hatch (mine is a 125i) , so it will go from 218hp to around 260hp with just a change of map. Others may be less successful however.
What car is it? And what are the remappers offering?
Thanks for the input so far you 2, its very interesting what you have told me. Its a 2011 C63. The guy says he can give me an extra 60 bhp and nearly 150 in torque
Looks optimistic expecting 150Nm more torque to me although different tuners may vary.Ah, the C63, the other situation like mine. Again Mercedes didn't want the C63 to step on the toes of it's bigger brothers (the E63), as as standard, the ECU in the C63 won't let you use full throttle.
After a remap, you can, so I would expect his claims to be valid.
I assume it's the 6.2 V8 C63 rather than the current 4.0 Turbo?
It may limit what you already haveYep. I'd say 281 is probably optimistic based on others who have had it done, but 260 ish should be possible - engine has 116K on it though, which may limit what I can get.
Think you've got enough horses with that. Seems little gain for invalidating warranty, insurance, increasing wear & tear etc.Thanks for the input so far you 2, its very interesting what you have told me. Its a 2011 C63. The guy says he can give me an extra 60 bhp and nearly 150 in torque
Ah, the C63, the other situation like mine. Again Mercedes didn't want the C63 to step on the toes of it's bigger brothers (the E63), as as standard, the ECU in the C63 won't let you use full throttle.
After a remap, you can, so I would expect his claims to be valid.
I assume it's the 6.2 V8 C63 rather than the current 4.0 Turbo?
Looks optimistic expecting 150Nm more torque to me although different tuners may vary.
Mercedes C W204 - 2010 -> 2014 C 63 AMG (2011) - Elite Remaps
You usually only get huge torque-gains by overclocking the turbo. When you haven't got one they will normally be more modest.
Think you've got enough horses with that. Seems little gain for invalidating warranty, insurance, increasing wear & tear etc.
Yep its the 6.3 V8. Think its from 2015? onwards they changed to Bi_turbo but dont quote me on that!
In which case yes - the MB ECU only allows the throttle to open to 65% (iirc), so the remap will let it go to 100%.
Only thing to bear in mind is it may be less worth it if you already have the MB Performance Pack, as they got an extra 30hp from the factory, so you'll see less of a gain if you have that. Red Calipers/Suede Steering Wheel are the giveaway.
If not, I'd fill yer boots personally.
Bodhi, so theoretically, I could get a 125i with a remap to put it not far off a 135i? My missus is looking at the one series but wants something with a bit of punch but the 140i is out of her price range
There is a lot of unease in the finance industry about the practice at the moment.Works for some people - if you just look at it as you are paying the depreciation on the car over 2/3 years, they don't typically work out too bad. Isn't for me as I like owning the car itself at the end of the term, however some people just want a long term rent. My best man is currently in a BMW dealership somewhere trying to get a lease on an X3 M40i Kids wagon as he just wants a hassle free works car for 2 years.
Horses for courses really.
I don't think it's cheap. I pay about 400 quid on a mortgage and at the end of 25 years I'll own a house. If I pay 75% of that on a car for 25 years I'll own precisely dick.They're mostly so cheap...
Its appauling value for money.They're mostly so cheap as they are based on the residual value of the car, so a BMW/Audi ends up cheaper than a Ford etc, that's why the finance houses look on them as a fairly safe bet. Biggest risk to them at the moment is the diesel backlash, if they're suddenly worth a lot less thanks to the efforts of the paper you've quoted, then a few manufacturers will be shitting themselves.
Its appauling value for money.
I very nearly went for the 140i but I fancied something a bit bigger and the manual handbrake seemed old-fashioned. You can't argue with the engine though. It's fantastic.Bodhi, so theoretically, I could get a 125i with a remap to put it not far off a 135i? My missus is looking at the one series but wants something with a bit of punch but the 140i is out of her price range