TV Doctor Who

MYstIC G

Official Licensed Lump of Coal™ Distributor
Staff member
Moderator
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
12,378
Shame it doesn't fit what happened inside the timelock on Gallifrey - Moffat is creative but crap at keeping the big picture in mind and fitting his writing into the series.
How so?
 

soze

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
12,508
I was not a fan tbh. It was a great episode but i really liked the idea of this War Doctor doing what was right. The fact he now has this cop out and it was all happy "timey-wimey" it takes away from his character tbh.
 

MYstIC G

Official Licensed Lump of Coal™ Distributor
Staff member
Moderator
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
12,378
Series 3 - episodes 12 and 13 to be precise.
If you mean the current series 3, i.e. the sound of the drums, then it doesn't really break it because you could interpret being frozen in time in a picture as being "time locked" to be honest.
 

rynnor

Rockhound
Moderator
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
9,353
If you mean the current series 3, i.e. the sound of the drums, then it doesn't really break it because you could interpret being frozen in time in a picture as being "time locked" to be honest.

Where was Timothy Dalton? Where was the whole leadership of the Time Lords? The Doctor already knew Gallifrey still existed but was frozen in a moment in time.

The Doctor had also previously stated that the Timelords became twisted by war into monsters (series 3 episode 13) - what we see in todays episode is a heroic defence - now we have two Gallifreys markedly different thanks to Moffat.
 

MYstIC G

Official Licensed Lump of Coal™ Distributor
Staff member
Moderator
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
12,378
Where was Timothy Dalton? Where was the whole leadership of the Time Lords? The Doctor already knew Gallifrey still existed but was frozen in a moment in time.

The Doctor had also previously stated that the Timelords became twisted by war into monsters - what we see in todays episode is a heroic defence - now we have two Gallifreys markedly different thanks to Moffat.
They explained that with
Where they kept saying at the end in the room that they would not remember this. Any Doctor Pre-Matt Smith will remember the time lords as utter bastards
Rewatch sir!
 

rynnor

Rockhound
Moderator
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
9,353
They explained that with
Where they kept saying at the end in the room that they would not remember this. Any Doctor Pre-Matt Smith will remember the time lords as utter bastards
Rewatch sir!

That makes no sense - why would he remember them as monsters (which in series 3 they clearly are) when in this reality they are doing a last ditch defence.

The two storylines are irreconcilable.
 

rynnor

Rockhound
Moderator
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
9,353
Quite entertaining though - a fun episode I just happen to think it wrecks the canon of storylines up to this point.
 

MYstIC G

Official Licensed Lump of Coal™ Distributor
Staff member
Moderator
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
12,378
That makes no sense - why would he remember them as monsters (which in series 3 they clearly are) when in this reality they are doing a last ditch defence.

The two storylines are irreconcilable.
They aren't, honestly.
 

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,409
They explained that with
Where they kept saying at the end in the room that they would not remember this. Any Doctor Pre-Matt Smith will remember the time lords as utter bastards
Rewatch sir!

Not really. Its been made pretty explicit that the Time Lords had become nearly as bad as the Daleks when the Doctor blows 'em up; this is a whole different spin on things.

I actually thoroughly enjoyed it, but it does rely on ignoring several years of plot development (especially The Sound of Drums, but not only that). Also

The Tom Baker thing was lovely but what did it mean? And where those Capaldi's eyes we saw when all the Tardises (Tardii?) arrived?
 

chipper

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Jan 15, 2004
Messages
1,874
well ofc gallifrey still exists its always existed the point is its time locked which means he cannot visit that piece of time and space its effectively a dead time line. locked away from the rest of the universe which is why he cannot (usually) go back to gallifrey on a jolly etc. and up until this episode the dr will have remembered nothing about what they did to save gallifrey.

as for the whole monsters thing im not sure does seem a bit inconsistent
 

MYstIC G

Official Licensed Lump of Coal™ Distributor
Staff member
Moderator
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
12,378
Not really. Its been made pretty explicit that the Time Lords had become nearly as bad as the Daleks when the Doctor blows 'em up; this is a whole different spin on things.

I actually thoroughly enjoyed it, but it does rely on ignoring several years of plot development (especially The Sound of Drums, but not only that). Also

The Tom Baker thing was lovely but what did it mean? And where those Capaldi's eyes we saw when all the Tardises (Tardii?) arrived?
Disagree
Rasillion is the bad guy. That episode was already broken anyway because it should have been impossible for Rasillion to put the White Point Star on Earth. Baker, don't know. Capaldi, yes.
 

Bigmac

Part of the furniture
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
830
Loved it. Looking forward to the Christmas special.
 

rynnor

Rockhound
Moderator
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
9,353
Disagree
Rasillion is the bad guy. That episode was already broken anyway because it should have been impossible for Rasillion to put the White Point Star on Earth.

That was the point of the master - his link to the time lock left a tiny breach through which the gem could pass - he was designed as a failsafe.
 

old.Tohtori

FH is my second home
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
45,210
Fun thing about timetravel and timeywimey stuff, you can change things without any reason ;)
 

rynnor

Rockhound
Moderator
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
9,353
Fun thing about timetravel and timeywimey stuff, you can change things without any reason ;)

All fiction has to maintain a sense of internal logic even if it bears no relation to our reality. To suggest just because its fantasy you can have crap writing is lazy.
 

old.Tohtori

FH is my second home
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
45,210
And simply calling it crap writing without having the full story/timeline is prejudgemental.
 

rynnor

Rockhound
Moderator
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
9,353
And simply calling it crap writing without having the full story/timeline is prejudgemental.

What are you blathering about - it was a show which presumably you watched - it has to stand on both its own merits and fit within the long running story.
 

rynnor

Rockhound
Moderator
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
9,353
Yes and since you don't know the full story of the doctor yet, I'll let tennant explain [/quote]

I think your missing the point about it being part of a series and making sense - it's been clear since Moffat took over that he's creative but pretty darn bad at maintaining the big picture.

The sooner he goes the better because its turning into a parody of itself which is a shame because in previous seasons it had some excellent stories.
 

Wij

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
18,205
Meh. Doctor Who is the softest of soft scifi. It's never self-consistent.

As for Tom Baker if I remember they specifically said they don't know what he is. I think you're just supposed to make of it what you want.

It was a decentish episode.

It made me wonder if it was written for Ecclestone, Tennant and Smith but Hurt was added when Eccleston refused. Things might have made more sense that way.
 

Hawkwind

FH is my second home
Joined
Jul 5, 2004
Messages
7,541
I really liked the episode and it made sense to me. Opens up an interesting story line. Really looking forward to the new series.
 

Raven

Happy Shopper Ray Mears
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,642
It was all very dramatic, lots of hand waving, looking inspired and shouting.
 

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,409
One thing; what happened with the Zygons? The negotiation started but what was the outcome? Do the Zygons own Birmingham now? (It would explain a lot).
 

MYstIC G

Official Licensed Lump of Coal™ Distributor
Staff member
Moderator
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
12,378
One thing; what happened with the Zygons? The negotiation started but what was the outcome? Do the Zygons own Birmingham now? (It would explain a lot).
Not entirely sure on that one, it really wasn't dealt with. The moment with scarf girl and her Zygon counterpart borrowing the inhaler also made little sense to me tbfh.
 

MYstIC G

Official Licensed Lump of Coal™ Distributor
Staff member
Moderator
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
12,378
It made me wonder if it was written for Ecclestone, Tennant and Smith but Hurt was added when Eccleston refused. Things might have made more sense that way.
Really miffed about the whole Ecclestone mess, he's probably my favourite Doctor Who :(
 

old.Tohtori

FH is my second home
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
45,210
I think your missing the point about it being part of a series and making sense - it's been clear since Moffat took over that he's creative but pretty darn bad at maintaining the big picture.

Thing is that it does make sense and things that don't, might next year. For example you saying that they were potrayed as having a heroic last stand, i saw nothing of the sort and in any case that might just be how it is -now-. As long as the story isn't done, timeywimey tings can change. Much like river song, only made truly sense in the end.

I'd rather you discuss the fez paradox, much more interesting.
 

Ormorof

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,827
the bbc usually explains any discrepancies as "lingering effects of the time war on the space time continuum"

technically having lots of time travels buggering things up all over the place is a nice get out of jail free card for most things :)
 

rynnor

Rockhound
Moderator
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
9,353
I still think that's just lazy writing - as is re-using 'a Christmas carol' again.
 

old.Tohtori

FH is my second home
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
45,210
Yeah it's not the first time the timewar is a plot device, it's like "looking at things while driving" in walking dead :p
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom