Gorbachioo
Fledgling Freddie
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2005
- Messages
- 1,250
they arnt accurate in the slightest though.
No they are not. But they do give some kind of a picture of the situation.
they arnt accurate in the slightest though.
2000 calories is fuck all. your average, obese, office working woman is recommend 2000 by the government.
surely that shows how little it is?
starving your self will ultimatley make you fatter.
1800 is not enough at all imo.
what type of weight did you drop exactly - water, fat, muscle?
hard to say, but if youre just cutting calories right down then its like muscle and water, leaving fat behind.
sure the onyl way to lose fat is eating in a calorie deficit, but that doesnt mean simply eating 500 less calories. you need a diet that constantly supplys the body with food, and enough good fats in there to make your body used to utilising fat as an energy store. eating the right amount will reduce the bodys want to store it.
For one, everyone’s bmr is different, I would recommend 1800 max for OD, Low GI Carbs / good source of protein and good source of fat in every meal, spaced out at 3 meals a day.[/COLOR]i would advise against 2 meals a day no matter how big or small they are. you need a constant release of everything gradually in the day, as you can only absorb so much in one sitting etc. i would suggest a good start is to eat breakfast, with some slow release energy (porridge cooked in water, with cinnamon and raisins) is something i personally look foward too, as sad it sounds . and if you like maybe chuck in some eggs for a bit of protein. problem with losing weight is unless you keep supplying the nutrients for your muscles, they will waste away too making you skinny fat. id say try and have some kind of protein in every meal (eggs, chicken, turkey, cottage cheese, quorn etc), not massive amounts needed really. as an example 100g of chicken is plenty, as is about 4 egg whites.
i wouldnt binge on food (i.e. eat then exercise because you feel guilty) as you will probably develop some kind of disorder. but there is nothing wrong with a bit of what you fancy once a week imo.
some simple changes for a start would be swap 'white' foods for 'brown' foods.
that would be wholegrain bread and not white, wholegrain pasta, basmati rice etc. cut out sugary stuff, drink plenty of H2O and what ever you do dont starve your self!
dont know if you want to count calories, but id aim for 2000 - 2200 or so a day (pretty sure i was on that for around the last 3 months). and if you want to drink, make it guiness or vodka with diet coke.
initial weight loss is probably water, but it shouldnt discourage you. after about 2-3 months of putting effort in you will notice and so wil everyone else.
not sure if its possible for you, but a highly recommend way of burning fat is doing around 40 mins of cardio before you eat anything, in the morning. not intense mind, your heart rate should be about 130bpm, which after the 40 mins leaves you dripping a bit but not breathless.
now id wait for vlad to come and verify what i said before you try any of it
I wasn't indicting you, people in general as it's widely said and yes I do know what I’m talking about, I’ve trained enough people, gave out enough advice on nutrition and training, and accomplished / cutted enough to be qualified to talk. Most nutritionists are idiots, "don't eat saturated fat" they really do talk shit.ok sure i dont know what im talking about.
good luck OD. obviously me doing what i said for the last 3 months and having it work doesnt mean anything. obviously my dietician is really a fraud, and everything i achieved at the gym is a lie!
im not here to be patronised and spoke down to by some random twat.
I think it's unneeded and physically & psychology(sp) demanding, actually I don't think, I know.Mephz do you not think that HIIT on an empty in terms of fat loss is detrimental, in terms of intensity vs fat utilisation?
You need low intensity with supressed/low insulin levels to burn fat - which makes the morning ideal. Arguably it is possible during the day however for most it's less hassle to do it first thing instead of manipulating the diet otherwise.
I wasn't indicting you, people in general as it's widely said and yes I do know what I’m talking about, I’ve trained enough people, gave out enough advice on nutrition and training, and accomplished / cutted enough to be qualified to talk. Most nutritionists are idiots, "don't eat saturated fat" they really do talk shit.
Battle of the Diet Geeks: Episode One
Theres more than 1 way to skin a cat.
Don't really see what the big deal is, u eat less than u burn - end of.
I lost 8 stone the other year, 1000 calories a day, no breakfast, not enuff protein, everything wrong for ur 'expert'. And ofc some of that was muscle, reading up after the event - put back 2 stone after. But then loosing the weight in itself gave me a taster for a more healthly life, and then lost it again with some more sensible plan, and put some on top of it on ontop with a bit of swimming etc.
Anyhow, it's just mind game with urself to keep to a regieme. Any scientificly wonderful diet means shit if u can't stick to it, no matter how worthwile it is on paper, it has to be something u like and can hold to.
hehe it was around there. I just get a bit sick of the endless talk of *this* is how u must do it, when it's a bit of whatever works for u.In fairness thoughh (obviously i don't know how much you weighed beforehand) but people the wrong side of 20 stone generally the normal rules are out the window.
Insulin is anti-lipolytic but your fine unless you eat fat with in high doses of it, but for normal eating, i.e. 80 grams of carbs and 30 grams of fat is very bad, but 60 grams and 15 grams isn't.I suppose it depends what way you look at it - however there is plenty of literature out there to state that a fat-max utilisation occurs at lower intensity exercise, i wouldn't say it's demanding (if you're referring to the cardio, not sure!).
However i thought that insulin would blunt any fat utilisation, doesn't it make CHO the main energy substrate?. At least thats what i was lead to believe as to why morning cardio was so effective when everything else was in place.
then if you want to lose a stone OF FAT its going to take about 2-3 months of proper dieting and exercise, not starving your self and living off minimal calories.
all imo, talking from experience. ive been losing weight for years (highest weight was at 19st). cutting out crisps and chocolate and doing 3 hours exercise a week only takes you so far.
Yeah, I had that thing for a month where ur breath smells of acetone, ur burning fat so fast, ketosis iirc.And yea to Mael, if your 20 odd stone, 1kcal is starvation big time, of course your gonna burn fat like a mudda fucker, I was 21 stone when I started lifting, I went down to 14 and now to 17/18 but not very lean.
how exactly did you expect to die? instant drop after some workout? in order for that to happen you need to have almost no bodyfat to dissolve + hard, i mean slavelabourkilling-hard work not some bullshit 3 hour workout (you dont do 3 hours of workout just coz you're in the gym for 3 hours btw)
anyway, i dont think i understand what you posted correctly
you did see the numbers i posted about how much the usage rose for females right? im not defying the fact that hard exercise will drain resources - im just pointing out that hard work isnt the most important thing BECAUSE the body itself already use quite alot of energy just "hybernating"