The reason the first was dumped was privacy. And data collection. It still drained yr battery. If you were happy with privacy issues i am sure the first would have worked fineThat's not really the point. The point is that the new version, that is supposed to work, doesn't for a lot of people and is actually worse than the one they spent weeks testing, months ago.
The government take advice then decide what to do. Which can be stuff out side of what scientists are saying. So i dont see the point of the article. Not like a few hours less drinking is a huge issueScientists advising Boris Johnson ‘never discussed’ 10pm pubs curfew plan, says Sage member
Professor Graham Medley fuels growing belief that government adopted the measure alonewww.independent.co.uk
The government take advice then decide what to do. Which can be stuff out side of what scientists are saying. So i dont see the point of the article. Not like a few hours less drinking is a huge issue
I hadnt seen anywhere that said there was a scientific reason behind the 10pm. Had the government claimed that and i missed it?That's entirely the point though.
Lots of people are questioning the scientific reasoning behind shutting pubs at 10pm, and this story confirms that there wasn't any scientific thought into it.
The Government is claiming that EVERYTHING it is doing is following the science, so that they can't be blamed when it goes wrong.I hadnt seen anywhere that said there was a scientific reason behind the 10pm. Had the government claimed that and i missed it?
The government take advice then decide what to do. Which can be stuff out side of what scientists are saying. So i dont see the point of the article. Not like a few hours less drinking is a huge issue
I hadnt seen anywhere that said there was a scientific reason behind the 10pm. Had the government claimed that and i missed it?
No, not trolling was asking. And it seemed a bit sensible to reduce drinking times to reduce social exposure times.Why wouldn't taking steps to reduce infection rates be based on science?
Are you trolling?
But if that is in addition to scientific advice whats the issue? Also you speak like there is a scientific consensus but there isnt. Some scientists are saying not far enough. Some too far. So which should it be?They are ignoring the scientific advice, they have been from the start.
That is the point.
Im reading on various forums and comments sections that pubs, barbers and gyms around the country are asking for proof you are running the app for entry and wont accept simple ID details.
Hundreds of Manchester students locked down after 127 Covid cases
Residents at two Manchester Metropolitan University halls told to stay in their rooms for 14 dayswww.theguardian.com
Would you trust a block of 18 year olds bored out of their minds to comply?I think it's pretty crazy how students are being treated.
Security & Police outside the accommodation not allowing anyone to leave.
I can't imagine them doing that to residential tower blocks across the UK.
my point exactly. I dont trust any one I dont know.I trust them as much as I trust anyone else to be quite honest.
my point exactly. I dont trust any one I dont know.
ppl here were giving 18 year old footballers a pass for being dicks with fanny in the international football. You think 18 year old without millions of ppl watching their every move will be more likely to stick to the rules. So i dont trust them and their hormonal ways, and if they are already in a place together that can be segragated why not have authorities outside to make sure they dont break the rules?That isn't your point
Your point was somehow students are less worthy of trust than older people and they deserve to have enforced lock down in their building - something that no one else is facing.
Sure they should be on lockdown but they shouldn't be policed differently to anyone else.
City Centres are struggling so get the students in to keep it afloat and when it blows up in your face blame the students.
ppl here were giving 18 year old footballers a pass for being dicks with fanny in the international football. You think 18 year old without millions of ppl watching their every move will be more likely to stick to the rules.
theres a good minority who dont ‘believe’ in covid who i guess are not sticking to the rules.
so we just supposed to let them get on with it while the rest of us do?
Unfuckingbelievable.
An absolute distortion of power that sends a very concerning message.
They should all run out at once and see what the police do, these lockfowns are about a gentle push to get as many people as possible to generally comply.
This targetting is completely the wrong approach.
They are just going to resist getting tested.