You were permitted to work on furlough. As long as it wasnt for your furloughed company.Yes definitely. The government should be able to connect the workers getting paid and working as well as getting furlough payments.
And then fine and prosecute both company directors and employees.
If you had two jobs, one furloughed one not, thdn yep - but read the article.You were permitted to work on furlough. As long as it wasnt for your furloughed company.
Yes i am aware of those who furloughed people and didnt really. I hope they were fewer than the article suggests and yes they need to pay money back if thats the case.If you had two jobs, one furloughed one not, thdn yep - but read the article.
I want my tax money back, spent on what it should be spent on, before they tax me more because they gave rich company owners a massive subsidy that they abused.
It's not just about that - this is massive industrial scale theft.It won't happen though.
I'm sure there's lots of self employed builders out there that claimed furlough but did some cash in hand jobs.
Tories won't want to hurt shareholders. They'll make sure everyone knows it was an offence but specifically not exclude potential whistleblowers from punishment.I suspect they will chase the money where it has been fraudulently claimed but it will take time, they will undoubtedly get help from employees simply because after working at the same time quite a few have now been made redundant.
Report tax fraud or avoidance to HMRC
Report tax fraud by a person or business to HMRC - tax evasion, VAT fraud, false claim for Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, Child Benefit or Tax Credit fraud.www.gov.uk
If you've ever dealt with HMRC you'll know that they're a joke.Report tax fraud or avoidance to HMRC
Report tax fraud by a person or business to HMRC - tax evasion, VAT fraud, false claim for Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, Child Benefit or Tax Credit fraud.www.gov.uk
If you've ever dealt with HMRC you'll know that they're a joke.
Utterly spineless, woefully underfunded. They don't have the capability for a job this size.
I wasnt furloghed..it was a grant and it says on the form you can still work and earn.
I wasnt furloghed..it was a grant and it says on the form you can still work and earn.
So it doesnt apply to the self employed.
Nah, he retired but kept his business open - so fraudulently applied for a grant of some sort.So you continued to work throughout the lock down, perhaps earning slightly less but you felt entitled to a government pay out, sounds very spongey to me.
How much to that pot? I'd imagine not a great deal
Im not fully retired.
Working this week.
Waiting for the second grant.
We are bailing out millions of middle class pointless jobs...hopefully this will be another step to fucking those scroungers off and replacing them with a 50p computer chip.
Seriously..the sister in laws boyfriend has an 80K pro rata job which entails running a questionaire to the suppliers involved in the motorway widening asking them how they FELT about the publicity surrounding removing the hard shoulders.
Not opinions on logistics..or ideas to help.
Just how they felt.
Commissioned by the government...paid for by the tax payer.
He doesnt even have any staff and pays nothing towards the process.
Jobs for boys is the backbone of the middle class.
The one where polish people can do the same job just as well and much more cheaply, so easy-lifers who don't like to do skilled work resort to racist agitation (and fraud) to protect their incomes?No..we work in the real world.
Yes and they have decimated the plumbing/ building jobs in the UK.
Practically none of them are gas registered so its not a problem to me.
I dont do any plumbing work anymore.
Coronavirus: Little evidence of Covid transmission in schools, says Williamson
The education secretary says a new coronavirus study supports the government decision to reopen schools.www.bbc.co.uk
Government abusing science again.
It's clear that routine testing in schools would provide evidence of transmission in schools - which is why the government doesn't want to do it.
'However, schools minister Nick Gibb rejected the idea, telling Times Radio on Sunday that he did not support routine testing for teachers and pupils who did not have symptoms.'
Too expensive. We expect x amount of staff to die, we consider it to be acceptable losses.
Let's not forget, we are at war.