It's twice as likely if they attended any institution, though. Indicating the problem may be institutions rather than the catholic aspect of it all.I saw that in the amended news report too. And I'm happy to agree with it.
"Those who attended an institution" includes catholic institutions. And "rising to one in five" mean's it's TWICE as likely.
It used to be the official policy. An official policy which is indeed terrible. It's been adapted now, though. Now official policy is to forward cases of possible child abuse to the courts immediately. In Belgium they've also asked external experts to help them in dealing with this whole thing, they've organised a commission (with external experts) to seek reconciliation with the victims who do not wish to go to court. They're also prepared to pay compensation for all victims, even those who no longer have a juridical case, because of statutes of limitation. I'll repeat again that it's too late and too slow (as institutions always are), but I believe they're on the right track.DaGaffer said:The difference is that in secular organisations that may or may not attempt to cover up abuse is that the motivations for cover up are often personal, financial, reputational or whatever, but what they are not, is policy. This is the issue about the catholic church, that the default response is to cover up, defend and close ranks as a matter of course, and that policy comes from the very top.
edit: In reply to Wij's link: I think the pope shouldn't have claimed diplomatic immunity.