Paradroid said:What if Bush get's back in and he then decides (now that the American people have ok'd his stance on the War on Terror) to attack Iran then N. Korea? Remember, he's got nothing to loose after a second term. What if he hammers home another patriot act and turns the US into a fascist dictatorship? What if he starts WWIII? Not bothered? Not effected by a nuclear war much?
Anything's possible with the neo-conservatives imho. It's one thing to fool a population that there's an evil enemy to struggle against, to increase a nationalist pride and unite the people - it's quite another to actually start believing it and follow through with a full scale war for no other reason than to generate cash and political clout.
This goes some way to explain Bush's grassroots support.
Bodhi said:Kerry has one policy. He isn't George Bush. For this alone, he deserves to get stuffed today.
Bush for a second term thx.
Sod american interests, bush is such an idiot on any policy that relates outside america, what he does has a major effect on the rest of the world, so for that reason alone kerry deserves to win, he cant be as much of a retard as bush.Is this sarcasam? I'd take Kerry over Bush any day, it seems to me that 90% of what Bush does harms American interests.
Utini said:Sod american interests, bush is such an idiot on any policy that relates outside america, what he does has a major effect on the rest of the world, so for that reason alone kerry deserves to win, he cant be as much of a retard as bush.
Will thinks Catsby has made an amazingly precise, satirical strike, on the problems with American democracy today.Catsby said:Catsby believes that it cannot be a democratic process unless it involves the candidates bare knuckle fighting.
With Kerrys reach, and Bushes tenacity, Catsby thinks it would be a good pay per view event.
Why? I can't see any plus points. Apart from Bodhi being insufferable...which isn't really a plus.GekuL said:It's better for us if Bush is in power. Kerry might be better for the americans, but who really cares about them?![]()
GekuL said:Kerry seems a bit of a pushover, especially when it comes to tough decisions. I think he would make America look weak, as he is not prepared to make decisions that might be unpopular.
Bodhi said:Christ almighty a lot of people are spouting a lot of shit on this thread. Bush will install himself as Supreme Dictator id he gets a second term? I'm guessing if he does he's go to foriegn summits via Porcine Airways.
Really does make me laugh the amount of people who have fallen for anti-Bush scaremongering. Especially considering this is one of things they hate Bush for. It's so so tragic.
nath said:This message was brought to you by the Fox network.
I'm George W. Bush, and I approve this message
Validus said:however, nader took about 10% of the US population, which happens to mostly be democarts who would of voted for kerry.
Validus said:If bush wins, and starts with a world war 3 intro, there will most probably be a civil war of some sort.
Validus said:If bush is elected, it will most likely be because of ralph nader. if there would be a choice of either kerry or bush, kerry would win. however, nader took about 10% of the US population, which happens to mostly be democarts who would of voted for kerry.
If bush wins, and starts with a world war 3 intro, there will most probably be a civil war of some sort.
Validus said:If bush is elected, it will most likely be because of ralph nader. if there would be a choice of either kerry or bush, kerry would win. however, nader took about 10% of the US population, which happens to mostly be democarts who would of voted for kerry.
If bush wins, and starts with a world war 3 intro, there will most probably be a civil war of some sort.