The A-10 is cooler and more useful than both.
The only scenario the apache could win is if they both start on the ground within a certain range from each other and know where each other are, but if the apache shot the bomber it would blow them both up ...
Good luck catching the blackbird at Mach 3.2 and flying at 85,000 ft.. Cya bomberNOTHING looks as awesome as the stealth bomber. Take your so-called cool looking jets and stick them up your bum. And while you're doing it, the stealth bomber has locked on to you from 60,000 ft and has a nuclear bomb aimed at your brown ring.
Good luck catching the blackbird at Mach 3.2 and flying at 85,000 ft.. Cya bomber
The SR-71 was retired in 1998. The stealth bomber is still being deployed
The SR-71 had huge problems though due to expansion etc, meant it leaked fuel like a bitch.
wikipedia said:The A-10 saw combat for the first time during the Gulf War in 1991, destroying more than 900 Iraqi tanks, 2,000 military vehicles, and 1,200 artillery pieces. A-10s shot down two Iraqi helicopters with the GAU-8 gun. The first of these occurred on February 6, 1991 when Captain Robert Swain shot down an Iraqi helicopter over Kuwait marking the A-10's first air-to-air victory. Four A-10s were shot down during the war, all by surface-to-air missiles. A-10s had a mission capable rate of 95.7%, flew 8,100 sorties, and launched 90% of the AGM-65 Maverick missiles fired in the conflict. Shortly after the Gulf War, the Air Force gave up on the idea of replacing the A-10 with a close air support version of the F-16.
The thing is, the B-2 is too expensive to use, not only in maintence but they can't afford to lose a single one - they cost $730 million each to make. Meanwhile, the A-10 performs the same job, much better, cheaper and more reliably while also only costing $11 million each to produce.