Another prime-time successfull Relic-raid

[Anarch]

well done hibs \0/

 

[pjuppe]

And Puppet, I think you had as many Albs defending the Relic as we had Hibs defending the Relics at that 07 AM raid with you having the bigger BG now.

So much for being underpopulated and so much for a prime time raid with almost no defense.

Not Hibernia but Hypocrisy.

But this is still going on, we will see where you end up at the end of the day when the Hib zerg needs go to bed and the Albs start to log in. Get prolly creamed then like you always do.

the starterpost was bad enought but this is just sad

congratluations on the relic by the way

 

[xxManiacxx]

7:30am or 5am its just as lame. As requiel has said many many times hibs can't be blamed for albs that just wanna pve.

Well the difference between hibs and mids is only 34 active characters according to GOAs Roll of honour while albs have 324 more active chars then Mid.

So 34 more chars = all those bonuses for hib but none for mid?

 

[Xxcalibur]

well done prime time ofc

 

[Quinlan]

And Puppet, I think you had as many Albs defending the Relic as we had Hibs defending the Relics at that 07 AM raid with you having the bigger BG now.

So much for being underpopulated and so much for a prime time raid with almost no defense.

Not Hibernia but Hypocrisy.

But this is still going on, we will see where you end up at the end of the day when the Hib zerg needs go to bed and the Albs start to log in. Get prolly creamed then like you always do.

Someone needs a hug

 

[Killerbee]

well done prime time ofc

It was prime time, but as on all friday, almost no alb grp out. Afaik our pug were the only one ^^ So 36 vs 108 isnt much better than the alarm clock. And yeah, its not your fault.

 

[Qbic]

And Puppet, I think you had as many Albs defending the Relic as we had Hibs defending the Relics at that 07 AM raid with you having the bigger BG now.

So much for being underpopulated and so much for a prime time raid with almost no defense.

Not Hibernia but Hypocrisy.

But this is still going on, we will see where you end up at the end of the day when the Hib zerg needs go to bed and the Albs start to log in. Get prolly creamed then like you always do.

Right so now you are saying that Albs only play around 5 am? Talk about being a hypocrit.......

 

[Sardine]

i guess its hibs fault albs only had 30 odd defenders?

 

[xxManiacxx]

i guess its hibs fault albs only had 30 odd defenders?

And yeah, its not your fault.

Guess you dont read many of the posts?

 

[Gamah]

Cus he actualy dosent have BG ? And actualy has a RL,so he cant go on thes raid's all the time ya know.

Read before you post? or find you drift in and out?

 

[sneakies]

Im in awe at how manisch manages to whine and QQ in every single thread that (s)he responds too - did you take lessons or is it all natural?

Am also surprised at how much people can continue to QQ and whine about underpopulated comments. Just looking at Roll of Honour:

Albion Active Chars: 1390
Hibernia Active Chars: 1032
Midgard Active Chars: 1066

These figures still depict Hibernia as the underpopulated; and in a month; i very much doubt there will even been underpopulated bonus to any realms (seeing as all are gonna surge above 1500 active players).

Try to stop whining about Hibs doing something that Albs apparently can't. And that's rallying the troops and following a leader at primetime to achieve a common goal. It's not our fault; and Albion as a whole cant be blamed; it's down to the individuals found in each realm, and it would appear Hibernia got the unfair share of community friendly people

 

[Ilum]

ok m8s

 

[Thadius]

Im in awe at how manisch manages to whine and QQ in every single thread that (s)he responds too - did you take lessons or is it all natural?

Am also surprised at how much people can continue to QQ and whine about underpopulated comments. Just looking at Roll of Honour:

Albion Active Chars: 1390
Hibernia Active Chars: 1032
Midgard Active Chars: 1066

These figures still depict Hibernia as the underpopulated; and in a month; i very much doubt there will even been underpopulated bonus to any realms (seeing as all are gonna surge above 1500 active players).

Try to stop whining about Hibs doing something that Albs apparently can't. And that's rallying the troops and following a leader at primetime to achieve a common goal. It's not our fault; and Albion as a whole cant be blamed; it's down to the individuals found in each realm, and it would appear Hibernia got the unfair share of community friendly people

As for albion chars, how many of them are buffbots/necro farmers? Nice raid btw, just wish they would do away with underpopulated realm bonuses so noone gets it.

Fair enough, hibs might be underpopulated, but they still can stand up there and take on albs and mids.

 

[Brite]

And Puppet, I think you had as many Albs defending the Relic as we had Hibs defending the Relics at that 07 AM raid with you having the bigger BG now.

So much for being underpopulated and so much for a prime time raid with almost no defense.

Not Hibernia but Hypocrisy.

But this is still going on, we will see where you end up at the end of the day when the Hib zerg needs go to bed and the Albs start to log in. Get prolly creamed then like you always do.

dont blame hibs for your realm not being arsed to defend

Active Characters Alb: 1,950 (35%) Hib: 1,667 (30%) Mid: 1,882 (34%)

although loads more hibs RvR because PvE takes a lot less time for hib/alb, but albs are too busy fucking about playing stalthers and zerging, and for mid im not sure but doesn't seem to be hardly anyone out, dont know why they are all PvEing surely they must get bored, if you want to PvE there are much better games for it.

Last week RP Alb: 18,547,602 (33%) Hib: 22,722,106 (40%) Mid: 14,931,409 (27%)

like someone said (i think puppet) hibs and mids rolls reversed from OF, and albs are same old

 

[balkeriz]

gratz Hibs

 

[Treeeebeard]

dont blame hibs for your realm not being arsed to defend

Active Characters Alb: 1,950 (35%) Hib: 1,667 (30%) Mid: 1,882 (34%)

although loads more hibs RvR because PvE takes a lot less time for hib/alb, but albs are too busy fucking about playing stalthers and zerging, and for mid im not sure but doesn't seem to be hardly anyone out, dont know why they are all PvEing surely they must get bored, if you want to PvE there are much better games for it.

Last week RP Alb: 18,547,602 (33%) Hib: 22,722,106 (40%) Mid: 14,931,409 (27%)

like someone said (i think puppet) hibs and mids rolls reversed from OF, and albs are same old

I agree with brite for once, I feel dirty

But yeh, Was a very nicely lead raid jupi

 

[Bowie]

Nice

Nice one Hibs, sorry i cant be there to enjoy it, as i am on a Hollyday

Look out for Alarm clock raids now Albs dont work in prime-time

Btw didnt see what u took ( Back ? )..

 

[Crookshanks]

like someone said (i think puppet) hibs and mids rolls reversed from OF, and albs are same old

I can't help think that this might have something to do with the balance of magic vs melee in the game. Mids are the superior tank realm, Hibs are the superior caster realm, Albs sit somewhere inbetween the two. Which would be fine - IF the game didn't swing from Dark Age of Tankalot to Dark Age of Castalot quite so vigourously - it must be a finely balanced as it doesn't seem to ever be in the middle (which presumably would benefit Albs).

Anyway - very well done to the Hibs - very well organised imo. I couldn't get to Renaris once the raid had begone - your patrols did a stirling job keeping us away.

Regarding underpopulated realm bonuses - imo they should be taken away from all the realms on Prydwen. 35%/34%/30% is pretty even - we're talking about 4-5% swing, or 3% max away from a perfect 33/33/33 split. This is hardly what I would consider unbalanced population. If we assume all three realms use the same proportional number of bb, then this variance is reduced even further. Take into consideration the tools the Hibs have to deal with larger amounts of opposition (shrooms, plenty of pbaoe/AE damage) and I don't believe there is any justification for Hibernia having the bonus' still.

 

[Tzare]

Gratz on relic nice job.
But is friday night primetime?
Regarding numbers of players, can anyone tell me why hibs should have bonuses in rvr when there is more hibs out there then mids and albs?
They have proved they can do more then fine anyways

 

[stupeh]

underpopulation bonus' make shrooms and 'shees more effective!?

 

[Thadius]

underpopulation bonus' make shrooms and 'shees more effective!?

Nah, makes getting a higher Realm Rank and higher level towers easier though!

 

[Azathrim]

Regarding numbers of players, can anyone tell me why hibs should have bonuses in rvr when there is more hibs out there then mids and albs?
They have proved they can do more then fine anyways

Yeah well, supposedly the Mid/Alb E&E's have been yelling on the internal boards screaming for this to be changed. All the while the Hib E&E have been goating and rediculing that effort.

The numbers now say that Hibs are just about even with Mids when it comes to numbers, and the RvR scores says they are far superior. Give a week of this, and Hibs will lead against Mids in numbers too.

Give 3 months and we'll have US conditions on the EU servers. Go go GoA.

 

[Aragyn]

I can't help think that this might have something to do with the balance of magic vs melee in the game. Mids are the superior tank realm, Hibs are the superior caster realm, Albs sit somewhere inbetween the two. Which would be fine - IF the game didn't swing from Dark Age of Tankalot to Dark Age of Castalot quite so vigourously - it must be a finely balanced as it doesn't seem to ever be in the middle (which presumably would benefit Albs).

Both types would be viable if only we wont get DET and make it tankalot again ^^

Ohh, and grats on raid, now maybe albs can retake keeps, and NOT get whine for doing so.

 

[Septina]

Last time i was logged on on pryd (2 - 3 days ago) keepstatus was 1 hib, 1 mid and 1 alb keep in HW.
So guess its accurate with an 'gratz on taking advantage of the keepstatus once again hibs'?
Last raid was just like this aswell.
Why not do that same keepstatus in Hib and see how long you'll keep your relics?

But oh, we actually had that in Emain a while back but the hiblets went and insta took back the keeps and then when albs took back a tower in HW some hibs went and flamed the 'roleplayers' on FH for ruining the great rvr! xD

 

[Gahn]

Argh couldn't make it, grats DeNiro MAN in leading it!

 

[Elendar]

how long till hibs use insta rvr to rr albs own relics and screw up insta rvr for a few weeks again :/

and i'm tired so minor flameing, penlids radar useful in the rr?

 

[Eva]

Congrats again showing that you can't handle the 'insta' rvr system without taking advantage. And friday night is not primetime. If people don't have something planned(like a relic raid) alot of them actually go out.

(I don't say it was a bad raid, but calling it primetime or fair is a joke.)

 

[stupeh]

<insert random whine>

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO you're not allowed to whine mr avalonian d0rf firbolg :<

 

[Quinlan]

Last time i was logged on on pryd (2 - 3 days ago) keepstatus was 1 hib, 1 mid and 1 alb keep in HW.
So guess its accurate with an 'gratz on taking advantage of the keepstatus once again hibs'?
Last raid was just like this aswell.
Why not do that same keepstatus in Hib and see how long you'll keep your relics?

But oh, we actually had that in Emain a while back but the hiblets went and insta took back the keeps and then when albs took back a tower in HW some hibs went and flamed the 'roleplayers' on FH for ruining the great rvr! xD

Sept actually wrong there. Last time the hibs used it since it was one less keep to take. This time only 1 keep was needed to take. The port to Berk made it a bit easier but nothing worth mentioning/ But primte time > alarm clock any day. And the whines about shrooms are funny. Your main problem was that 4 fg roamed so no alb could get to renaris. Underpopulation 4thwin

 

[Septina]

Sept actually wrong there. Last time the hibs used it since it was one less keep to take. This time only 1 keep was needed to take. The port to Berk made it a bit easier but nothing worth mentioning/ But primte time > alarm clock any day. And the whines about shrooms are funny. Your main problem was that 4 fg roamed so no alb could get to renaris. Underpopulation 4thwin

As i said, i'm not very active on pryd so i only assumed this is what happened since it happened last time.
That and i heard someone mentioning it also
Guess i was wrong then and i appologize for the whine and well done on a prime time raid =)

And i still havent understood why people whine on 'alarmclock raids'.
In my opinion they're the smartest and most efective way to do a relic raid.
Cheesy? Sure, might be... but, least possible opposition = highest success rate.
And i dont think the realm that actually gets the 1,2 or 3 relics care about what the FH flamers think about the 'alarmclock lameness'.
Cause tbh, i've seen so many people whine on alarmclock raids when another realm has done them. Then when their own realm does it its 'HAHAHA payback' or something similar