Albs are so bad and they suck etc.

[Lumikki]

Originally posted by Carlos Bananos
alb as a realm does need a little help, but its not as bad as a lot presume


a lot of alb excal is just clueless (and spanish)

What Carlos said

xx

 

[BidAccount]

Hypothetical question for our Midgardian colleagues.

What group setup in the other two realms can match the offensive output and defensive ability of the midgard savage melee group?

And were you in Hib or Alb, how would you combat a mid savage melee group/

 

[quinthar]

Originally posted by zelur
albs don't need skill or tactics etc.. They can always relie on their zerg.
overpopulation for the win imo.

Lol RG and Zerg inthe same sentence....irresepective of when you last managed to get 2FG

 

[quinthar]

Originally posted by old.Nol
Quite sad that people will stop playing because they can no longer play an overpowered char.

I'd love to see how many people stopped playing zerkers at the patch and whent he sudden take up of savages started, would be some interesting stats

 

[quinthar]

Originally posted by old.Nol
Am I supposed to feel some form of remorse? WAAAAAAH, we will quite because we can no longer WTFPWN!?

So what, I think Midgard will be better off with people that are prepared to fight because they chose Midgard to defend as their realm.

Anyway, Hib could use the numbers so bring it on.

I wonder if they'll all roll Cabalists to make them FoTM

 

[K0nah]

s'funny i dont remember CE beating us in even numbers last couple months when they didnt add, not grps i was in anyway...

JH are the hardest guild to beat on this server now. Copy their setup exactly and after a little practice u will be just as hard to beat (probably) or on 2nd thoughts plz dont ;/

 

[Rollie]

Originally posted by donttouchpoopy
Hypothetical question for our Midgardian colleagues.

What group setup in the other two realms can match the offensive output and defensive ability of the midgard savage melee group?

And were you in Hib or Alb, how would you combat a mid savage melee group/

i dont think alb can match the middy utility tbh, hibs can though imho, hib groups are very hard if they are guild groups and well balanced.

druid (insta root spec)
druid (healing spec)
druid (heal/buff spec)
bard
mana eld/chanter or hero/bm
chanter or hero/bm
hero/bm
hero/bm

4 healing classes like middy, up too 5 pets for interupt/nukage.

 

[Kallio]

Originally posted by Puppetmistress
Where is this constant nerfing of Midgard? Can you name some examples of recent Midgard-nerfs?

the point in that post I made was that albs and hibs laughing and calling names has caused the whole "they nerf midagard alltime" myth. Because the LAxe fix became big deal.

"HAHAHA THEYA RE NERFING BERSERKERS!!! HAHAHAHHAHAHAH! HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH! AHAHHAhaHAHHAHAH!"

this kind of post existed then, a lot. Many people got the idea that zerks are really goona be a useless class after the nerf.

Dont you think ytou would get bitter if someone would be like this to each time you stumble to BW? and start to cry about it?

 

[Gordonax]

I think pretty much everyone agrees savages need a little adjustment, although I think an outright nerf would be wrong. As the savage TL has said, the rate of single/doubles/triples/quads needs putting into line with what was intended. And removing determination - or at least making more expensive for savages - would be a welcome change.
But, as other people have said, the problem in RvR between the realms isn't the classes - it's the number of classes needed to form the a high-utility set up. What Mid needs isn't classes nerfing, it's a better spread of "essential" skills so that one or two more classes are needed in the perfect group. That would benefit Mid - it's no fun in Mid playing a "non-essential" class - and make the game a bit more balanced.

 

[tildson]

Originally posted by dakeyras
NP chose Midgard because at the start of the game Midgard was by far the easiest realm to level in and was way overpowered in RvR i.e. the stungard era.

After a nice patch Hibernia became overpowered in RvR. And with great haste NP all rolled in Hibernia.

Then along came an Albion luv patch and it looked as though Albion would be dominant in RvR. And with great haste NP all rolled in Albion.

The Albion patch wasn't as good as was thought and NP gave up. Savages were created and soon it became clear that they were overpowered. And so NP rolled savages.

Please don't say NP picked Midgard for their interest in Norse mythology

I cant say, because i dont know whether NP rolled mid due to ae-stun and insta - because i chose Albion at start. Dont think NP chose mid due to "overpowerdness" tbh, but i might be wrong, it just sounds abit too much to be true.

NP went hib when they got uber? Hib got insta-mez in 1,51, NP went Pryd in 1.59 or smth - Savages were implemented in 1.55 or sooner.

The story behind MLF Albion has been repeated too many times within these boards, search and you will find my friend. You may want to read the MLF VN-boards for some feedback if you arent satisfied.


Some other sidenotes:

Most of NP are Swedes, it could very well affect the choice of realm. Just compare the number of swedes in mid compared to hib, or the number of UK people in Albion compared to others.

Oh, and i dinged 50 (along with Medde which was the only one who has a 50savage amongs those who went US)with my Savage 2-3months before we went US and played Alb.

You really should get the facts more accurate until next time you make a judgement about someone. Things arent always as they seem to appear