a little help? (digi cams)

[Clowneh!]

http://forums.barrysworld.com/showthread.php?threadid=44752

erk... theres a wider audience here innit
dont hurt me.

 

[Summo]

This thread seems to contain the collective opinions of the BW peeps in handy thread-form.

Now get out of my sight!

 

[.cage]

 

[Clowneh!]

heh, i dont got 200 quid :/

 

[smurkin]

clowneh, I have a Konica Digital Revio KD-100

It was a hundred quid

it has 1.2 Mpix & and lil lcd screen

At first I thought it sucked...then I realised it needs a very steady hand...it is more sensitive to low light and movement than my SLR optical Canon (probably coz I tend to use asa400 and really big lenses) ...once I got used to it I got to really like it..now I take it everywhere.

I bought a 64 Meg card to put in it for about 50 quid...without this the capacity for storing pix in max resolution is pathetic. Theres no sound with the video...but its usable as a webcam. As with most digital cameras...you may spend as much on batteries as you save by not buying film ....it connects as a removable drive via usb (ie no need to reboot to use it...just plug it in)...

I use it for my web site mostly...but my pics are all in highest res and I photo CD them.

If money is an issue this camera aint bad .... if your doing the photos for someones wedding...I wouldn't recommend

KD-100

 

[Clowneh!]

got a link to ur webby? i wanna see the quality of the photos.

i dunno the difference between 1.2 megapixels and 2.0 etc..
anyone got any pics? heh

 

[smurkin]

that wont help...the website files are all compressed to 100-200 K (plus its family stuff). A full size high res piccy weighs in at > 1 Mb @1024 x 1280....I can e-mail some examples...

 

[Clowneh!]

yes please... ill pm you my addy heh

btw anyone else feel free to post summat to let see the difference between 1.3 and 3 megapixels etc