Politics 2024/25 General Election Voting Intention (2022)

[DaGaffer]

Yeah, but it's being increasingly used to disrupt peaceful protest groups.

And in terms of actual harm - it's theft. The crime the police guidance says "don't turn up".

I guess we could embed undercover officers dressed as protestors to stop this? Maybe get a few of the protestors pregnant whilst we're at it?

It's a lot of expense to police protest groups for crime we don't care about if it wasn't for the fact it's linked to protest...

I actually have no frame of reference about how expensive this kind of thing is to police (relative to other police work); since they pretty much gave themselves away, I suspect not actually that much. And that's also part of the problem; if the police didn't pursue it and then were shown to have known but not acted, they'd be getting a kicking for that instead.

 

[Scouse]

There's nothing in the article that said they've given themselves up - no mention of how tgey've coordinated or organised - so the assumption that they're discissing criminal actions in public on social media is a big assumption here...

 

[DaGaffer]

UK to pay France another £660m to curb Channel crossings

Three-year deal includes funding for a riot squad to ‘disperse’ people trying to board small boats

www.theguardian.com

£660 million. The French must be laughing their arses off.

 

[Scouse]

UK to pay France another £660m to curb Channel crossings

Three-year deal includes funding for a riot squad to ‘disperse’ people trying to board small boats

www.theguardian.com

£660 million. The French must be laughing their arses off.

That's what occured to me.

I wonder if this is really a payment for something else?

But if they're really employing 1100 people we could pay for enough people to cover the entire south coast with binoculars, and some boats, and they could grab small boats before they land and dump 'em back on the beach in france. You'd need less than 100 people to cover the entire south coast if we had one every 10k.

You could pay for a nice hut too, to protect 'em when it rains. And they could offer tourism advice.

Six hundred and sixty million quid!!!

 

[DaGaffer]

That's what occured to me.

I wonder if this is really a payment for something else?

But if they're really employing 1100 people we could pay for enough people to cover the entire south coast with binoculars, and some boats, and they could grab small boats before they land and dump 'em back on the beach in france. You'd need less than 100 people to cover the entire south coast if we had one every 10k.

You could pay for a nice hut too, to protect 'em when it rains. And they could offer tourism advice.

Six hundred and sixty million quid!!!

I read up a bit more on it last night; the "performance" of the French is based on the number of boats they stop from leaving and arrests of traffickers, but there's no actual penalties or incentives in the payments, and of course the actual numbers of crossings don't seem to have been dented (the French might argue "it could be worse without us" I suppose). Then the costs of asylum accommodation and processing is in the billions (£3bn plus a year), so in very simplistic terms the £660M might seem like a good deal, but it's the kind of money that you could spend on a drone screen and coast guard intercepts all the way along the French coast if you really wanted to stop migrants.

 

[Scouse]

I like guys in sheds with extra tourism duties rather than noisy dystopian drones, but we're aligned

 

[Gwadien]

Doesn't this apply to all public expenditure though?

How the fuck is everything always so ridiculously expensive?

 

[DaGaffer]

Doesn't this apply to all public expenditure though?

How the fuck is everything always so ridiculously expensive?

File under "it's complicated". Putting 30,000 asylum seekers in hotels is a big part of it, but the optics of building camps (or modern day prison hulks) doesn't play well. Of course if you wanted to be radical in your thinking; process the asylum seekers really fast, but introduce some kind of workfare for their first couple of years in the country so they're paying their way immediately.

 

[Gwadien]

File under "it's complicated". Putting 30,000 asylum seekers in hotels is a big part of it, but the optics of building camps (or modern day prison hulks) doesn't play well. Of course if you wanted to be radical in your thinking; process the asylum seekers really fast, but introduce some kind of workfare for their first couple of years in the country so they're paying their way immediately.

Yeah, but even then, they're paying over the odds.

There's plenty of shit hole hotels that are struggling across the country, to suggest that they should get well over the odds because they're closing the door to non existent customers is complete bollocks.

It's like school trusts and their CEOs (yes I'm going on about this again) that get half a million a year in pay to get put over a barrel and slapped around for everything.

Like my last place - we were lucky to have a premises guy that was a tradie and knew what he was talking about and knew what he was doing - he had loads of contractors in for tender for a new building that ranged from £250k - £1m. Or that they rented out their 3g pitch to a guy who then 'worked' full time sub-letting that to football clubs etc and the school is given a pat on the back by the government because 'they're making money' rather than giving it for free/cheap for local football clubs and stuff, like we used to.

I just think 'it's complicated' is code for there's too much interest (particularly from the private sector) to keep the gravy train going so any notion of ending it is getting shut down immediately.

Meanwhile our public sector is on its knees and political parties are going to have to increase taxation, but for what purpose?

I mean even if we did build prison camps, it'd still cost us pfft a couple of billion for a few tents.

I just see it as the path to the death of the West, but so long as I'malrightjack.

 

[Raven]

What to know about Peter Mandelson

A key Labour figure for decades, Lord Mandelson faces renewed scrutiny over his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

www.bbc.co.uk

Just another PDF file, it's not that deep, BBC.

 

[Raven]

West Northants council restarts parking charges after error

The council is working on a "mechanism" to allow people to claim refunds for the incorrect charges.

www.bbc.co.uk

Nobody actually knows whether or not you can park in town for free or not, the whole thing has become a complete farce, and they are doing similar with bin collections. They do not appear to understand what the word consultation means.

They have also randomly closed a couple of street vendors, in what is left of the market, over 10 million invested, and the market has gone from 20-30 stalls to a handful. Not all their work, but they are finishing the work of the Tories, who for reasons nobody can fathom, do not want people going into town.

It's fantastic news for national politics, the shine really is coming off deform. If there are no boats to shout at, they have absolutely nothing, and it's becoming clearer to the thick people that vote for them.

I say, help vote them in at local level, let people see them before it matters too much. The few proper, ingrained racists can all vote for Restore, and it won't matter.

 

[Embattle]

View: https://youtu.be/SqObceUurRs?si=XiubK1OgMY6ws5Va

 

[Raven]

Zack Polanski apologises for sharing post criticising police

The Green leader was facing a growing backlash for appearing to back criticism of arresting officers.

www.bbc.co.uk

A fuck-up nobody needs...it's best to just say nothing.

Get better advisers

 

[Scouse]

A fuck-up nobody needs...it's best to just say nothing.

Meh, po po apparently repeatedly kicked the cunt in the head whilst he was on the ground after they'd tazered him.

But yep, the boob whisperer really shouldn't be touching social media at that time. It's the human response, but it's not the correct political response.

Or maybe it is? It's certainly not the "done thing". But we've just had a political leader making a point about police brutality.

Well, political leader of a sort.

However, none of the news organisations that have reported on this have linked to the twatter feed. We're just not adult enough to make our own minds up...

 

[Raven]

Shocked, SHOCKED I tell you.

Protests may need to be stopped in some cases, Keir Starmer suggests

The PM tells the BBC he is concerned about the "cumulative" effect of marches on the Jewish community.

www.bbc.co.uk

 

[Gwadien]

Meh, po po apparently repeatedly kicked the cunt in the head whilst he was on the ground after they'd tazered him.

But yep, the boob whisperer really shouldn't be touching social media at that time. It's the human response, but it's not the correct political response.

Or maybe it is? It's certainly not the "done thing". But we've just had a political leader making a point about police brutality.

Well, political leader of a sort.

However, none of the news organisations that have reported on this have linked to the twatter feed. We're just not adult enough to make our own minds up...

'Hi mate, you alright? after you've taken that knife out of that dudes throat, could you please kindly put the knife down that would be excellent.'

Serious, lol.

 

[Deebs]

'Hi mate, you alright? after you've taken that knife out of that dudes throat, could you please kindly put the knife down that would be excellent.'

Serious, lol.

You forgot the

"Here is a bottle of water and a cleaning cloth so you can clean the knife before we put it in our evidence bag".

 

[Scouse]

'Hi mate, you alright? after you've taken that knife out of that dudes throat, could you please kindly put the knife down that would be excellent.'

Serious, lol.

You're on twitter right? Can you post the actual video? That way we've got a chance of having an adult conversation on the actual facts.

(And it'd be nice if you didn't misrepresent what I said too. But that hope is barely smouldering now.)

So. Vid? Lets have a look at what happened. You love the exploitative snake oil salesman so you're probably subscribed to his channel?

 

[Scouse]

Shocked, SHOCKED I tell you.

Protests may need to be stopped in some cases, Keir Starmer suggests

The PM tells the BBC he is concerned about the "cumulative" effect of marches on the Jewish community.

www.bbc.co.uk

Starmer wants tougher policing of language non-shocker.

I really wish someone would stab him in the neck, rather than jewish people.

If the po-po wanted to tazer him then repeatedly kerb-stomp his teeth in whilst he was incapacitated I would also be fully supportive.

 

[Raven]

Erm...I would not quite go that far ffs...

I wish he would stop fucking around, and get on with what he was elected to do. He should not be getting in the way of people protesting against genocide.

 

[Scouse]

I wish he would stop fucking around, and get on with what he was elected to do.

He's not interested in that. It's clear he never was.

I'm not serious of course*. But I want hime (and his ilk, of which there are many) gone.

Thatcher was shocked at the end of her life that her economic reforms didn't actually bring about prosperity for all. She was dumbfounded that the rich hoarded their cash rather than gave it away. She was dedparately naieve.

Starmer knows exactly what war crimes are and what oppression is. And he likes them, if his 'side' is in control.

He's a hateful piece of shit.


*Edit: Though there's probably a law prohibiting me from saying that online. I has occured to me maybe I should be more careful, even on freddyshouse. Which, of course, is the feeling Starmer wants to engender across the population: fear.

 

[Embattle]

It isn't a traffic stop.

 

[BloodOmen]

He's going out, he might as well do one good thing before he's out... shackle us back to the EU, even if not a full join and ensure some sort of clause is in place to prevent cunts like Farage from easily just taking an axe to it if they get their grubby hands on #10

 

[DaGaffer]

Meh, po po apparently repeatedly kicked the cunt in the head whilst he was on the ground after they'd tazered him.

No they didn't

Police body cam shows moment Golders Green suspect Tasered

Footage shows the moment a man was arrested after two Jewish men were stabbed in north London.

www.bbc.com

Guy stabs two people and he's wearing a heavy coat and backpack in hot weather? I'd have machine gunned the cunt to be on the safe side. The "kicking in the head" was obviously the cop waving his leg about to unravel the taser wire, but they didn't kick anyone.

 

[Scouse]

I suspect this is what he shared:

Video. Video shows suspect approaching police after stabbing in north London

Video. Images shared on social media show police tasering and arresting a man with a knife in Golders Green in north London, after two Jewish men were stabbed in an attack. Police declared it a "terrorist incident" and said a 45-year-old man had been arrested, adding that he had also tried to...

www.euronews.com

Seems fair enough to me. I'd be kicking a cunt in a head if he wouldn't let go of a knife, and I'd be keeping hold of the tazer trigger.

In case anyone fancies verifying what I originally said - that I'd not seen it, that political leaders probably shouldn't be retweeting shit (but maybe they should), and that apparently the footage (which I said I'd not seen) showed cops kicking the guy in the head once he was down.

Like I said, seems fair enough to me.

The "kicking in the head" was obviously the cop waving his leg about to unravel the taser wire, but they didn't kick anyone.

Not in the footage I found. (Or chatgpt did ). They did, repeatedly.

But then, I still think that's fair game for a guy with a knife. When they had the knife, they really should have stopped kerb stomping him, but in that situation...

Remember though - the po po killed a guy by simply pushing him over. It's still pretty serious. But not condeming here...

 

[caLLous]

I suspect this is what he shared:

What who shared? All I saw Polanski do (originally) was like/retweet/whatever a text post saying the police were heavy-handed.

This is the original post:

 

[Scouse]

What who shared? All I saw Polanski do (originally) was like/retweet/whatever a text post saying the police were heavy-handed.

Oh. So that's the story then?

FFS. You can't read anything nowadays and have it be clear.

That's what Starmer said makes Polanski unsuitable to lead any political party for? Essentially the post is true - a guy was repeatedly kicked in the head after tasering who had serious mental health issues. (And to be fair to the po-po, I also think it was fair game).

For me - the story here is, why is this being treated as terrorism then, rather than just "mental whackjob kills jews"?

Edit: And of course, the other story that Starmer's opportunistically saying we're going to have to clamp down further on what people are allowed to say, and also stop some peaceful protests. The cunt.

 

[Scouse]

Protests may need to be stopped in some cases, Keir Starmer suggests

The PM tells the BBC he is concerned about the "cumulative" effect of marches on the Jewish community.

www.bbc.co.uk

From his own mouth.

Remember, he's a publically avowed zionist, with a jewish wife and children, who said collective punishment of the palestinians was fair game.

 

[caLLous]

Oh. So that's the story then?

FFS. You can't read anything nowadays and have it be clear.

That's what Starmer said makes Polanski unsuitable to lead any political party for? Essentially the post is true - a guy was repeatedly kicked in the head after tasering who had serious mental health issues. (And to be fair to the po-po, I also think it was fair game).

For me - the story here is, why is this being treated as terrorism then, rather than just "mental whackjob kills jews"?

Edit: And of course, the other story that Starmer's opportunistically saying we're going to have to clamp down further on what people are allowed to say, and also stop some peaceful protests. The cunt.

That screenshot of the tweet was on The Guardian's site, I'm surprised you missed it.

 

[Scouse]

That screenshot of the tweet was on The Guardian's site, I'm surprised you missed it.

I was replying to this link posted by raven:

Zack Polanski apologises for sharing post criticising police

The Green leader was facing a growing backlash for appearing to back criticism of arresting officers.

www.bbc.co.uk

Are you trying to find something shit I did or something?

I mean, we can just talk, can't we?