K
klavrynd
Guest
- Thread starter
- #31
1. I have had 6 level 50's in the past, all rr5+, and I have been >playing since 1.45. k? So I'm not some brand new guy, I know
>what I'm talking about. I've seen zerkers in action for near as
>long as you've been playing one.
the point i was making was a different one, see point 5
> 2. <snip>
>3. The alternatives are better at their own thing. Zerker is still
> great at what it does.
in 1.62 savages take over the "big hit melee machine" title from zerk, which is now a bm without shield or thrustspec and an imo gimped merc
zerk was the backbone of the meleegroup, now it's savage, and savages will get spots in groups over zerks because of their utility
>4. You may not be a FOTM. But you're damn well acting like one. >You're running out on the class that you haven't even played
>post-fix.
see above
>5. So by your own words, even you aren't able to say what's
>valid and what's not. Because you haven't even seen the patch
>yet.
it they're talking percentages then my damage isn't going to be worth shit all, and again see point 3
>what I'm talking about. I've seen zerkers in action for near as
>long as you've been playing one.
the point i was making was a different one, see point 5
> 2. <snip>
>3. The alternatives are better at their own thing. Zerker is still
> great at what it does.
in 1.62 savages take over the "big hit melee machine" title from zerk, which is now a bm without shield or thrustspec and an imo gimped merc
zerk was the backbone of the meleegroup, now it's savage, and savages will get spots in groups over zerks because of their utility
>4. You may not be a FOTM. But you're damn well acting like one. >You're running out on the class that you haven't even played
>post-fix.
see above
>5. So by your own words, even you aren't able to say what's
>valid and what's not. Because you haven't even seen the patch
>yet.
it they're talking percentages then my damage isn't going to be worth shit all, and again see point 3