Football World Cup 2014

Who Will Win?


  • Total voters
    49

Calaen

I am a massive cock who isn't firing atm!
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,538
So this is the World Cup we're going to get is it? Don't piss off the Brazilian fans in case they riot. This ref is bullshit.

Can you imagine them going out early. Itll be fucking carnage. Personally I'm just pleased the stadium hasn't collapsed!
 

old.user4556

Has a sexy sister. I am also a Bodhi wannabee.
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
16,163
So that's two average strikes resulted in goals.

Croatia looked promising, but too much lethargy and average goalkeeping. Score line flatters Brazil.
 

Shagrat

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
6,945
#robbed

as the kids would say

Croatia have looked tidy. Oscar was Brazil's best player.

disappointing that the ref has been this bad in the first game :(
 

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,656
I thought Brasil looked average for most of the game. The ref was terrible though.
 

ileks

Part of the furniture
Joined
Jul 26, 2007
Messages
2,293
Brazil were really lucky tonight. They won't win it if they carry on like that. What a shit ref as well.
 

CorNokZ

Currently a stay at home dad
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
19,779
As I read on Twitter: good to see all parts of the world represented at the World Cup, but couldn't the refs just be from the best leagues?
 

Hawkwind

FH is my second home
Joined
Jul 5, 2004
Messages
7,541
most one sided ref display since Sir Alex stepped down at Utd ;) Actually made me wonder if it was intentional. Imagine the protests tomorrow if Brazil had lost a game. Certainly would not have improved the situation.

If that was Rooney instead of Neymar on Modric it would have been red.
 

ileks

Part of the furniture
Joined
Jul 26, 2007
Messages
2,293
Has anyone found a good reliable stream for the WC btw? It really annoys me that the live stream on Iplayer or ITVplayer isn't HD. You really need HD for football.
 

Hawkwind

FH is my second home
Joined
Jul 5, 2004
Messages
7,541
cost me 450 Dirhams or about 70 GBP to get World Cup Matches Live in HD on TV. Daylight robbery by the qatari tossers than have the rights. At least the game had English commentary so a big improvement over the last WC.
 

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,656
cost me 450 Dirhams or about 70 GBP to get World Cup Matches Live in HD on TV. Daylight robbery by the qatari tossers than have the rights. At least the game had English commentary so a big improvement over the last WC.

Can't you watch UK stuff over a proxy or something?
 

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,656
Can't you watch UK stuff over a proxy or something?

Edit! Have a look at Hola, Chrome (and I presume firefox) plug in. I use it to watch US Netflix.

Disclaimer about weird country laws.
 

Hawkwind

FH is my second home
Joined
Jul 5, 2004
Messages
7,541
Can't you watch UK stuff over a proxy or something?

Yeah can watch iPlayer and such via UK proxy. Also, used my Mum's Sky subscription to watch the sport for a time. But it can be hit and miss, BBC in particular started blocking all the Proxy IP's they could find. I already use Hola but again hit and miss, a lot of streams get taken down quickly. Basically, we have little choice if you want to guarantee getting the games in HD.

We just have to accept that as expats we get ripped off so the locals get everything cheap and very well paid to do very little. 500 GBP for water & electricity a month! Meanwhile they pay a government clerk 12K plus GBP a month to work from 7 am to 2 pm. They create meaningless bureaucracy like National ID, Housing Agencies and such just to create jobs for locals at the expats expense. Every company in Dubai who employs over 100 people must employ a local to act as an agent of the government (PRO), these guys basically do naff all except pick up a pay check. Huge joke here in Dubai but companies accept it as a tax.
 

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,412
Just turned down a job in Dubai for this very reason; on the surface the tax free salary looked good, but then I looked at accommodation, utilities and schools and realised I'd only be a few hundred quid better off. They were like "but....tax free!" And I was "it hardly matters if I have to pay three times as much for a house...."
 

Chilly

Balls of steel
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,046
ok, so first few bets (including the one I had on Brazil v croatia)

Brazil v Croatia : £2255 back @ 1.33, won £729.27
Against my better judgement, I've backed England for £983.61 @ 3.05 in the Italy game.
Agentina v Bosnia Herzelolercopter layed Argentina for £476.19 @ 1.47

The size of the stakes might sound strange, but they take into account my estimated edge to the market and the price at which the bet is placed. Not betting on any games today, couldn't find a decent edge.
 

Chilly

Balls of steel
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,046
Oh and I jused spotted a cheeky bit of value on the

Uruguay v Costa Rica lay Uruguay for £1020 @ 1.47
 

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,656
I had £10 on Brazil to win 4.1 and Neymar to score first, 145/1 special on skybet. The own goal wouldn't have counted as first goal scorer so 1 goal away from a tasty £1450.

"free" money to bet though, just whats left over in my account from the premierleague season.
 

CorNokZ

Currently a stay at home dad
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
19,779
How much do you reckon you'll make over the course of the world cup?
 

Chilly

Balls of steel
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,046
How much do you reckon you'll make over the course of the world cup?
It's really hard to say. However, I'd expect to bet maybe £100k in total and, as an average, hope to make between 5% and 10% return on that. Now, because there are not that many games, it could well be that I lose or win as much as 50% of that. Mixed in with my other betting, it all evens itself out, though. That's why I said CAVEAT EMPTOR. Tournament betting is inherently unstable and risky because there's so few games and the competitive environment is so different to normal. It makes it very hard to model.
 

Chilly

Balls of steel
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,046
Oh and there's the automated betting I'll be doing on the matches, too, which I'll probably do upwards of £20m volume on, but the margins there are wafer-thin.

/edit, actually, probably not that much. Maybe £10m.
 

soze

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
12,508
That is massive massive money. Do you have a figure of if Iose £xxx I will stop betting?
 

Chilly

Balls of steel
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,046
That is massive massive money. Do you have a figure of if Iose £xxx I will stop betting?
It's complicated.

Certain strategies we (my syndicate partner and I) run are very low risk, very high volume. Others are pure position taking where we do some research and then decide the market has it wrong and then punt on our opinion. The former is a low margin cash cow, but the latter is where the real money is. If you can tolerate the losing streaks, then the overall margin can be very high. Our low risk stuff is of the order of 1% margin, the high risk would be minimum 10%.

Stop if we lose £x? Well, we manage our bankroll such that we adjust staking according to how much we currently have in total. Eg: lets say I have a bank of £100 and I want to bet on brazil and I think I have an edge of 15%, I can use a formula called the kelly staking criteria to work out how much of that £100 to bet on that one bet. It optimises bank growth over time and factors in both winning and losing variance. The real problem is that the 15% figure is an estimate, and may be wildly wrong. Ultimately, yes, there is a point at which I'd stop, but it's not defined in stone. shrug.

Oh, and for that brazil bet, you'd not bet more than 5% of your bankroll, tops.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom