A
arm_of_tda
Guest
- Thread starter
- #31
Firstly, I agree with the general opinion, the crafter was wrong here and has reneged on a verbal agreement. When a price is agreed then there is no reason whatsoever that the buyer should pay more (except of course for a tip, which is entirely voluntary ofc)
But I think that there is another side that is often ignored here. As an Armourcrafter of Hibernia I have often recieved requests for armour (sometimes when I have replied to a /b ask) only to be told that the buyer "no longer needs the item(s)" once I have made it. I could put a long list here but that is hardly fair.
What she should have done is offered the 99% at a premium price, but maybe have another suit to give you should you rightly not want to pay the additional cost.
However, I must admit that had I been in her position then the quality would be a moot issue, except I loathe giving out anything below 97% generally and 98% to <lvl 30, but thats cos I'm a softy
But I think that there is another side that is often ignored here. As an Armourcrafter of Hibernia I have often recieved requests for armour (sometimes when I have replied to a /b ask) only to be told that the buyer "no longer needs the item(s)" once I have made it. I could put a long list here but that is hardly fair.
What she should have done is offered the 99% at a premium price, but maybe have another suit to give you should you rightly not want to pay the additional cost.
However, I must admit that had I been in her position then the quality would be a moot issue, except I loathe giving out anything below 97% generally and 98% to <lvl 30, but thats cos I'm a softy