Which is the strongest of the 3 archer classes?

Edaemos

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jul 1, 2004
Messages
908
Best archer against an assasin is ranger by far due to CD

Best archer vs archer id say is ranger or hunter.

Best tower humper is scout due to shield and slight range advantage.

Overall i think the 3 archer classes are quite balanced now compared to OF.
 

Jaem-

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Jan 20, 2004
Messages
2,498
Puppet said:
Think DW makes the more then up for the blocking. Also dont forget the DW cuts both blocking and evading in two; where the scout doesnt cut in half the evade of the ranger.

If the scout is simular to what I had 39Thrust 42Shield (basicaly a lite-s/s arms), then I'd say its pretty even vs rangers, theres still a huge number of block vs DW (due to 400+dex and 42+shield) and add spec af into it which will lower the rangers dmg on them, from my experience at least.

Note, this is just melee/defences I'm talking about, a scout will still have tricks up its sleeve such as slam and critshot if the target doesn't purge, as well as a insta root.
 

lathoniel

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
120
scouts dont die to hunters. shield > 2handed every single day of the year (tho FZ > all). ask fatty about them 13 blocks in a row, ownage :)

and if u can beat sb's in 1v1, ull surely own a ranger. ranger melee dmg sux, even as much as less than a 1handed sword swing and without ur poison and con debuffs that assasins have ur toast. cutest thing is about rangers they do love to scrap, think they forget they have a bow sometimes.
 

anioal

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
932
Best archer against an assasin is scout due to shield spec, spec af, sojourner ml path

Best archer vs archer id say is scout due to shield spec, spec af.

Best tower humper is scout due to better range, better bow dmg caused by the missing of spec af on opponents (and because of numbers ofc :) )

sooo... the winner is scout



ps its not a scout whine
 

Kinad

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
324
Scouts are the strongest by far if specced properly and with sufficient rp's.

At high rr triple CC specced scouts do win against nearly any enemy stealther
1on1, or atleast survive. 1 purge against fz + 3 cc attacks is bad odds.

Ohh and im insulted.. Lath hits like a gimp compared to me ! :)
His a cheaky bastard who when we play together allways wait to fire last shot :)

Well im off to play WoW for a bit, gl to any i fought in the past.
 

Aussie

Banned
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
2,438
anioal said:
Best archer against an assasin is scout due to shield spec, spec af, sojourner ml path

ye because its very hard to get zephyr in without stun :rolleyes:
 

Ronso

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Mar 12, 2004
Messages
2,674
best archer V assasin is a hero with 50shield 50large weapon and a short bow
best archer V archer is a hero with 50shield 50large weapon and a short bow
best archer for camping shit is is a hero with 50shield 50large weapon and a short bow who jumps off the keep and runs towards u m00sing ...

seriously .. :p
 

lathoniel

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
120
Kinad said:
Well im off to play WoW for a bit, gl to any i fought in the past.


lol, so true.

fanks to those hibs that made me and kin feel like gods of ownage on plateau overlooking eras tower :)
 

Puppet

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
3,231
lathoniel said:
and if u can beat sb's in 1v1, ull surely own a ranger. ranger melee dmg sux, even as much as less than a 1handed sword swing

U beat a SB because of Forceful Zephyr, Ignore Pain or an unpurged slam and his 15% weakness to heat (or 10% weakness to slash).

This is all things your scout has above the SB which makes the scout beat the SB with that stuff up. The problem isnt beating the SB, the problem is beating someone with similar abilities.

Your scout has IP? So does the ranger. Your scout has FZ? So does the ranger. You dont have 15% heat weakness? Neither does the ranger.

Mostly the one timing the FZ the best (eg. preventing enemy to IP) will win in archer vs archer. Without FZ but all the other abilities (IP, Purge) a good ranger should beat a scout 90% of the time; scout is no match in melee to my ranger. Hunter can be very tough to fight as ranger because even DW > 2H in dps the problem is catching up with the hunter his dps. Key is here really does the ranger evade the hunter or not. 1-2 evades (misses!) and its game-over for the hunter.

I dont recall loosing to a scout in a 1 vs 1 if I had purge up and didnt get FZ'ed on the wrong time in like 4-5 months :O
 

lathoniel

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
120
ill fight ya, u can use fz, i wont. ill even forget to use the cold lgm i forget to carry, ranger melee dmg sux0rs.

prydwen, well there ya go.
 

Gravediggah

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
79
Scouts,scouts, and more scouts

scouts SCOUTS! hate that word. fu scouts!

However after reading a scout TL report a while ago, I truly hope they sacked that guy and banned hes accounts lol, Its like stuck in my head "We scouts need improved melee damage, On range we are ok but when it comes to melee we die" It just ringed a bell in my head "SO WTH DO YOU THINK U MORON ARE YOU A SCOUT OR A TANK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" :flame:

*ice* calm again

Anyways balance here balance there who cares really, daoc never had ANY balance and will never get any either. Mythic to busy fixing more lag expands that we can buy instead of taking care of the already annoying ingame issue's.


SCOUTS!
 

Sauruman

Loyal Freddie
Joined
Jul 5, 2004
Messages
801
Gravediggah said:
Scouts,scouts, and more scouts

scouts SCOUTS! hate that word. fu scouts!

However after reading a scout TL report a while ago, I truly hope they sacked that guy and banned hes accounts lol, Its like stuck in my head "We scouts need improved melee damage, On range we are ok but when it comes to melee we die" It just ringed a bell in my head "SO WTH DO YOU THINK U MORON ARE YOU A SCOUT OR A TANK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" :flame:

*ice* calm again

Anyways balance here balance there who cares really, daoc never had ANY balance and will never get any either. Mythic to busy fixing more lag expands that we can buy instead of taking care of the already annoying ingame issue's.


SCOUTS!

U're right, scouts own every class in melee, even a fg if he wants... :wanker:
 

anioal

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
932
Sauruman said:
U're right, scouts own every class in melee, even a fg if he wants... :wanker:

let me guess: with 50 bow and 42 shield u want to outmelee a ranger/ns or a hunter/sb ?

pff...
 

Edaemos

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jul 1, 2004
Messages
908
anioal said:
let me guess: with 50 bow and 42 shield u want to outmelee a ranger/ns or a hunter/sb ?

pff...
Looks like your guess was wrong :m00:
 

Vandar

Loyal Freddie
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
222
lathoniel said:
ill fight ya, u can use fz, i wont. ill even forget to use the cold lgm i forget to carry, ranger melee dmg sux0rs.

prydwen, well there ya go.

I've been hit for 500 dmg in one round by a celt ranger, yes I was buffed, yes, I have decent resists, he was thrust so no malice or battler. Damm was I surprised.
He must have had some nice crits but I'd hardly call that crap. Its a slight difference to my 200-250.
 

Puppet

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
3,231
lathoniel said:
ill fight ya, u can use fz, i wont. ill even forget to use the cold lgm i forget to carry, ranger melee dmg sux0rs.

prydwen, well there ya go.

Yes; kinda hard to duel then :(
 

Puppet

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
3,231
Vandar said:
I've been hit for 500 dmg in one round by a celt ranger, yes I was buffed, yes, I have decent resists, he was thrust so no malice or battler. Damm was I surprised.
He must have had some nice crits but I'd hardly call that crap. Its a slight difference to my 200-250.

After debuffs go off its pretty common for me to hit for 250-300 mainhand on studded from a scout. Depending on crits and offhands its quite easy to reach 500 / round. After debuffs it can even go over 650 on SB's without heat-resists and spec-AF

Im swinging at about ~1.8 secs with druid haste and my 3.9 mainhand legendary weapon.
 

lathoniel

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
120
cant recall ever being hit for 300+ mh, thats like PA damage, 100-150 seems the norm, the lower end being the average tbh, most crazy ass rangers tend to try to straff a lot, dunno why people do this, yes its annoying, but i think it usually ends up worse for the straffer.

all i know is a solo ranger = a dead ranger,
a solo ranger without purge = a dead ranger twice.

same goes for hunters, ns and sb, matter of fact apart from the odd occasional, damn i shoulda ip'd a little sooner there, or a evade stun without purge on 10% or summit, ive only lost 3 descent fights since NF, all to paradoxx. maybe rr or experience has a bit to do with it. but i do sincerely think a scout can take anything these days, in the stealth war that is.

i fking h8 kessa.
 

Jaem-

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Jan 20, 2004
Messages
2,498
Puppet said:
After debuffs go off its pretty common for me to hit for 250-300 mainhand on studded from a scout. Depending on crits and offhands its quite easy to reach 500 / round. After debuffs it can even go over 650 on SB's without heat-resists and spec-AF

Im swinging at about ~1.8 secs with druid haste and my 3.9 mainhand legendary weapon.

Sounds like simular dmg to 39thrust on a scout, tho I didn't crit much as of no MoP, think the best I've done is around 500.
 

Jaem-

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Jan 20, 2004
Messages
2,498
lathoniel said:
cant recall ever being hit for 300+ mh, thats like PA damage, 100-150 seems the norm, the lower end being the average tbh, most crazy ass rangers tend to try to straff a lot, dunno why people do this, yes its annoying, but i think it usually ends up worse for the straffer.

Heh, can be very funny when they try to strafe so much, that you can land side styles alot. :p
 

-Freezingwiz-

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
1,365
Jaem- said:
Heh, can be very funny when they try to strafe so much, that you can land side styles alot. :p

Gimpster ones attcked me when I was on 20% hp and some 1 mincer added on him, he ended up dieing because he strafed so much he acualy only hit me ones xD I had a good laugh after that :wub: (Pre NF, mids had relics etc)
 

Smilewhenyousaythat

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
770
censi said:
Scout, Hunter, Ranger?

Which is the better at killing visuals?
Which is the best at killing assasins?
Which is the best at killing other archers? (assuming both are roaming stealthed) (scouts are obviously the better snipers)

1. Scout.

2. Ranger.

3. Close, but hunter takes it.
 

Nul

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jun 15, 2004
Messages
461
I have a 48.5 hunter called Killz.
I've been looking for a good RvR bow but havent found one yet.
Anyone got suggestions? (Will prolly get Fools bow later on bcos
of siege lore, for doors only.) So far I've been thinking of getting
an legendary bow, bad/good?

Atm Im using a 99% crafted one. Feels a bit gimpy.. :p

Bow name? Price? Any suggestions?
 

seeph

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
245
vintervargen said:
: anyone with str relics? ;p


erhm scouts have no use for str relics :) 99% doesnt have meleespec so relics don't help

rangers get great benefits from relics with DW

Hunters get benefits aswell but with 2h the advantage is not half as good as with DW

so ur short answer is kinda inadequate :) but for original poster : RANGER !
 

Vodkafairy

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
7,798
seeph said:
erhm scouts have no use for str relics :)

nooo, not at all :rolleyes:

seeph said:
so ur short answer is kinda inadequate

mefinks yours is, str relics affect archery damage also, not just str stat or something stupid :p
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom