I can't even tell what toht is trying to say? What exactly did you agree with to vote olga so early on?
Vote: cerb
No commitment to any votes, didn't vote for nate, didn't agree with no lynch at day 1, barely any contact with nate at all and kept quiet during all the arguments.
I'm basing this on who voted for nate as i think a backstab is way too early for this game.
The blind faith he showed in following you yesterday, and he now questions your position because Itceh didn't say anything about you, and he does not trust you despite bagging a wolf when following your vote.
He trying to confuse matters, and that to me is worse than not saying anything!
You really are al over the shop man. Your constant drivel is driving me insane. Burn you and you wolf = result. Burn you and your innocent = result, there is less shit to wade through.
He didn't show blind faith; he questioned my vote. You just sound like toht's parrot, you are copying what he says without checking the facts behind it. Why should he trust me? I don't trust any of you. I was certain nate was a wolf, but through logic, I had to stake my life on that, and to a degree I was lucky. Olga has no reason to trust me, unless he knows something I don't.
You do realise what you have accused Olga of, we could accuse you of. You are blindly following toht.
At least he is contributing, what would you like to contribute? You are not contributing logic. Let's take the above for example, if we burn toht and he is innocent, what odds are we left with tomorrow morning? Think about that before claiming we can afford to lynch innocents. I'm very concerned you seem to easy going on an innocent dying, and based on that: vote rubric
Sure olga. Firstly, he drawers it after day 1 defending the wolf. He is all over the place with his voting and accusations today and thridly he makes my head hurt trying to figure out where he is coming from.
Ch3t I think he is probabky guilty. The last part is a semi flippant remark due to the tense situation, its what i do, its how i cope.
Uara and Cerb have given us nothing what so ever - so here I have nothing to go on.
Well you should have a bad feeling, you've got a vote against you, and I don't think your comment about toht was throw away, given you've actually voted for him. Your reasoning is not sound at all.
He didn't show blind faith; he questioned my vote. You just sound like toht's parrot, you are copying what he says without checking the facts behind it. Why should he trust me? I don't trust any of you. I was certain nate was a wolf, but through logic, I had to stake my life on that, and to a degree I was lucky. Olga has no reason to trust me, unless he knows something I don't.
You do realise what you have accused Olga of, we could accuse you of. You are blindly following toht.
At least he is contributing, what would you like to contribute? You are not contributing logic. Let's take the above for example, if we burn toht and he is innocent, what odds are we left with tomorrow morning? Think about that before claiming we can afford to lynch innocents. I'm very concerned you seem to easy going on an innocent dying, and based on that: vote rubric
I dont see it, the vote that is
no one is talking about any huge wolf pack so you might want re-read my post.
I refuse to belive we'r dealing with a pack of three wolves, so therfore if we have three wolves they have to be dived up in 2 + 1