I quoted some from the earlier article. E.g:His run-in with Cathy Newman?
Don't get me wrong @Wij - I've only watched a little of his stuff online (not read his books) - and I'll be honest, didn't find much wrong with it. In the same way that I didn't think he said a thing out of place in the Cathy Newman interview (which this article seems to think paints him in a bad light).
You seem to hate him though and I don't hate you - so can you post some vids of his where he's just talking utter shite so I can reappraise him? At the moment all there seems to be are a lot of articles from people that are pissed off with him (and I'm sure there's a lot of people who publish articles where it's a bit of a love-in - so they probably cancel each other out.
But if there's a lot of stuff out there where he's pontificating absolute bollocks I'd like to see it - I've watched maybe an hour or so of his stuff across several vids and he comes across as an intelligent, reasonable guy. Maybe I don't agree with some of what he says, do agree with some of what he does say, but I don't get the vitriol.
The Cathy Newman thing is a case in point - she acted like she fucking hated him - but I don't think he said anything particularly inflammatory IMO and weathered the storm well and with dignity. Where's the hatred coming from?
I'd watch some of his stuff then - if you're just reading articles rather than watching his actual stuff then you'll build up a particular impression. I wouldn't say he's devoid of any meaningful content - what sort of academic does studies that are utterly worthless? It may not be physics, but there's at least some research going on there that will contribute something worthwhile to the sum of human understanding.I don't hate him. I just have no respect for someone who talks without giving any meaningful content. It is not worthy of analysis. The fact that he thinks he deserves respect just makes him even more ridiculous.
I suspect you are wrong.I'd watch some of his stuff then - if you're just reading articles rather than watching his actual stuff then you'll build up a particular impression. I wouldn't say he's devoid of any meaningful content - what sort of academic does studies that are utterly worthless? It may not be physics, but there's at least some research going on there that will contribute something worthwhile to the sum of human understanding.
Generally when people of a certain ideology line up to trash you as a person you must be saying things that challenge their world view. If the challenge is weak and meaningless they'll ignore you - if there's at least some evidence behind what he's saying then he becomes a threat.
I suspect with him it's the latter...
Secretly that's what he'd want.So what you're saying is that you want to put your winky in Peterson's bumhole?
I read the article, then I looked up the author. He's a left-winger who writes for the Guardian. I think his basic fundamental beliefs are put under threat by Peterson. And he's not exactly an intellectual - so where's he getting his opinions from?:
Richard Poplak's own bio said:Richard Poplak ... trained as a filmmaker and fine artist at Montreal’s Concordia University and has produced and directed numerous short films, music videos and commercials.
What qualifies him as a superior intellectual?the Foreword, which is written by Dr Norman Doidge, author of the bestselling [Publisher’s note: yup] The Brain That Changes Itself, who offers an encomium of Peterson so effusive that the book instantly takes on the air of a self-published manuscript written by a lay intellectual who once audited a Phil 101 class at the Winnipeg Technical Institute, circa 1983
Just to throw something into the mix @Wij:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hU7AewaHr0Q
OK, there's stuff to take exception to in there. But is it such a bad worldview? Why are people so threatened by that?
I can personally vouch for the lawyer thing - that describes exactly my brother in law and his working circumstances.
Watching Russia today over here in sunny spain.
Footage of the Syrian militants/mercenaries being offered bus rides home from the battle areas in exchange for minefield maps and dismantling of booby traps.
Eatching the conflict from the Russian viewpoint is something we hardly get to see.
America and the UK is determined not to let this war end.
The smart move, in hindsight, would have been an independent Kurdish state in Iraq that could annex the Syrian areas under Kurdish control all the way to the Mediterranean, creating a US backed zone from Turkey to the Persian gulf.