Wij
I am a FH squatter
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2003
- Messages
- 18,404
Ah so it's the timescale that's the issue now?Yes, potentially possible over long periods of time when an ecology has time to adapt. And, from your article, we're only beginning to understand it's huge importance in single-celled organisms.
We're not, however, talking about that. We're talking about wholesale human-induced gene transfer to change the characteristics of crops (and animals) at a pace that simply doesn't happen in the natural world with unknown knock-on consequences, and the potential mass-production of these gene-modified crops and animals to the detriment of natural species.
We barely understand the knock on effects of what we're doing with conventional agriculture - good and bad - so steaming ahead with deregulation over GMO is simply too risky.
Precautionary principle please.
(You seem very cavalier on this? Not saying "don't ever do it" - I'm saying "we don't need it right now - so lets learn shit, but not introduce wholesale to the wild")
We do all kinds of things to change the characteristics of crops all the time. What's special about HGT that means we have to be careful about introducing them into the wild beyond all the testing that is done? What's the extra risk?