BloodOmen
I am a FH squatter
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2004
- Messages
- 18,214
http://madamenoire.com/288520/forme...on-for-raping-and-impregnating-his-daughters/
90 years + 3 more trials to come.. sheesh
Now compare that to british prison sentences
http://madamenoire.com/288520/forme...on-for-raping-and-impregnating-his-daughters/
90 years + 3 more trials to come.. sheesh
Do you know anything about reducing crime? It's not all about long prison sentences.Now compare that to british prison sentencesworlds apart - he'll be in prison singing "Bumming me softly" for the next 90 years.
Do you know anything about reducing crime? It's not all about long prison sentences.
I'm saying that rehabilitating people is not only possible but by far the best way. It's my view that all sentences should default to life and then be adjusted based on parole/rehabilitation board findings.
Yep, fair enough, and they'll rot in prison (which they already do). But a lot of people are in prison for crimes committed when young. We're all retards when we're young and any young person (by young I mean < 25 or so) in prison should be given a real, solid chance at rehabilitation.That I agree with but realistically not everyone can be rehabilitated and quite frankly some people just don't deserve the chance for rehabilitation.
Yep, fair enough, and they'll rot in prison (which they already do). But a lot of people are in prison for crimes committed when young. We're all retards when we're young and any young person (by young I mean < 25 or so) in prison should be given a real, solid chance at rehabilitation.
I totally agree, but the assumption should be that we have to try. We as a society let them down in the first place, it would be a double fucking to not give them a try and going straight. However, as you say, some people are just not safe to be on the streets.Aye but again young people can sometimes be pure monsters, look at the thing with Woolwich, one was 22 the other 28 and would you honestly trust them to be let out again given what they were put away for?
Oh I don't know? seems fairly fucking logical to me, lock up people committing crime for very long time - said people no longer on streets to commit crime.... where as the UK its lock people up no time at all so they can be out sooner to re-offend - pretty straight forward I'd say? unless you are honestly trying to say giving people a second chance or low sentences is a good idea?
I thought your friendslist was always empty anyway Tohtori![]()
Well, your logic has been proven again and again to not work. Harsher sentencing does not equal lower crime. Pretty straightforward with plenty of examples. The US being one.
Ive also seen plenty of example of second chances proven to work. While it may sound awfully cold to say, prison should be about rehabilitating the criminal, to safeguard the community of any future crimes. Not to lock someone up on moral grounds.
That's cool. But I cant help asking "where's the clunge?".
Prison is retrobution
im sure you posted this a few months agoIsn't it annoying when you have games that don't let you skip the intro logo etc? Know why? Because while those are playing the game is loading bits and bobs just like any other loading screen would.
Funny how something that is meant to fill out annoying stuff(like loading) becomes a norm to hate.
Ofcourse it would help if developers told this to people![]()
im sure you posted this a few months ago
Except when you can skip them...
im sure you posted this a few months ago
He likes to remind us he works in the gaming industry on a regular basis.
This from someone who talks about his IT sh*t every other week![]()